Cargando…

Measuring the Characteristic Topography of Brain Stiffness with Magnetic Resonance Elastography

PURPOSE: To develop a reliable magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-based method for measuring regional brain stiffness. METHODS: First, simulation studies were used to demonstrate how stiffness measurements can be biased by changes in brain morphometry, such as those due to atrophy. Adaptive postp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Matthew C., Huston, John, Jack, Clifford R., Glaser, Kevin J., Senjem, Matthew L., Chen, Jun, Manduca, Armando, Felmlee, Joel P., Ehman, Richard L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081668
_version_ 1782293534421811200
author Murphy, Matthew C.
Huston, John
Jack, Clifford R.
Glaser, Kevin J.
Senjem, Matthew L.
Chen, Jun
Manduca, Armando
Felmlee, Joel P.
Ehman, Richard L.
author_facet Murphy, Matthew C.
Huston, John
Jack, Clifford R.
Glaser, Kevin J.
Senjem, Matthew L.
Chen, Jun
Manduca, Armando
Felmlee, Joel P.
Ehman, Richard L.
author_sort Murphy, Matthew C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a reliable magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-based method for measuring regional brain stiffness. METHODS: First, simulation studies were used to demonstrate how stiffness measurements can be biased by changes in brain morphometry, such as those due to atrophy. Adaptive postprocessing methods were created that significantly reduce the spatial extent of edge artifacts and eliminate atrophy-related bias. Second, a pipeline for regional brain stiffness measurement was developed and evaluated for test-retest reliability in 10 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: This technique indicates high test-retest repeatability with a typical coefficient of variation of less than 1% for global brain stiffness and less than 2% for the lobes of the brain and the cerebellum. Furthermore, this study reveals that the brain possesses a characteristic topography of mechanical properties, and also that lobar stiffness measurements tend to correlate with one another within an individual. CONCLUSION: The methods presented in this work are resistant to noise- and edge-related biases that are common in the field of brain MRE, demonstrate high test-retest reliability, and provide independent regional stiffness measurements. This pipeline will allow future investigations to measure changes to the brain’s mechanical properties and how they relate to the characteristic topographies that are typical of many neurologic diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3847077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38470772013-12-05 Measuring the Characteristic Topography of Brain Stiffness with Magnetic Resonance Elastography Murphy, Matthew C. Huston, John Jack, Clifford R. Glaser, Kevin J. Senjem, Matthew L. Chen, Jun Manduca, Armando Felmlee, Joel P. Ehman, Richard L. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To develop a reliable magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-based method for measuring regional brain stiffness. METHODS: First, simulation studies were used to demonstrate how stiffness measurements can be biased by changes in brain morphometry, such as those due to atrophy. Adaptive postprocessing methods were created that significantly reduce the spatial extent of edge artifacts and eliminate atrophy-related bias. Second, a pipeline for regional brain stiffness measurement was developed and evaluated for test-retest reliability in 10 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: This technique indicates high test-retest repeatability with a typical coefficient of variation of less than 1% for global brain stiffness and less than 2% for the lobes of the brain and the cerebellum. Furthermore, this study reveals that the brain possesses a characteristic topography of mechanical properties, and also that lobar stiffness measurements tend to correlate with one another within an individual. CONCLUSION: The methods presented in this work are resistant to noise- and edge-related biases that are common in the field of brain MRE, demonstrate high test-retest reliability, and provide independent regional stiffness measurements. This pipeline will allow future investigations to measure changes to the brain’s mechanical properties and how they relate to the characteristic topographies that are typical of many neurologic diseases. Public Library of Science 2013-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3847077/ /pubmed/24312570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081668 Text en © 2013 Murphy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murphy, Matthew C.
Huston, John
Jack, Clifford R.
Glaser, Kevin J.
Senjem, Matthew L.
Chen, Jun
Manduca, Armando
Felmlee, Joel P.
Ehman, Richard L.
Measuring the Characteristic Topography of Brain Stiffness with Magnetic Resonance Elastography
title Measuring the Characteristic Topography of Brain Stiffness with Magnetic Resonance Elastography
title_full Measuring the Characteristic Topography of Brain Stiffness with Magnetic Resonance Elastography
title_fullStr Measuring the Characteristic Topography of Brain Stiffness with Magnetic Resonance Elastography
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the Characteristic Topography of Brain Stiffness with Magnetic Resonance Elastography
title_short Measuring the Characteristic Topography of Brain Stiffness with Magnetic Resonance Elastography
title_sort measuring the characteristic topography of brain stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24312570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081668
work_keys_str_mv AT murphymatthewc measuringthecharacteristictopographyofbrainstiffnesswithmagneticresonanceelastography
AT hustonjohn measuringthecharacteristictopographyofbrainstiffnesswithmagneticresonanceelastography
AT jackcliffordr measuringthecharacteristictopographyofbrainstiffnesswithmagneticresonanceelastography
AT glaserkevinj measuringthecharacteristictopographyofbrainstiffnesswithmagneticresonanceelastography
AT senjemmatthewl measuringthecharacteristictopographyofbrainstiffnesswithmagneticresonanceelastography
AT chenjun measuringthecharacteristictopographyofbrainstiffnesswithmagneticresonanceelastography
AT manducaarmando measuringthecharacteristictopographyofbrainstiffnesswithmagneticresonanceelastography
AT felmleejoelp measuringthecharacteristictopographyofbrainstiffnesswithmagneticresonanceelastography
AT ehmanrichardl measuringthecharacteristictopographyofbrainstiffnesswithmagneticresonanceelastography