Cargando…

Timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study using administrative data

BACKGROUND: While efforts to improve cancer outcomes have typically focused on improving quality of care, recently, a growing emphasis has been placed on timely access to quality cancer care. This retrospective cohort study examines, at a population level, the relationship between quality and timeli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Porter, Geoffrey, Urquhart, Robin, Kendell, Cynthia, Bu, Jingyu, McConnell, Yarrow, Grunfeld, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-355
_version_ 1782293540993236992
author Porter, Geoffrey
Urquhart, Robin
Kendell, Cynthia
Bu, Jingyu
McConnell, Yarrow
Grunfeld, Eva
author_facet Porter, Geoffrey
Urquhart, Robin
Kendell, Cynthia
Bu, Jingyu
McConnell, Yarrow
Grunfeld, Eva
author_sort Porter, Geoffrey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While efforts to improve cancer outcomes have typically focused on improving quality of care, recently, a growing emphasis has been placed on timely access to quality cancer care. This retrospective cohort study examines, at a population level, the relationship between quality and timeliness of colorectal cancer (CRC) care in a single Canadian province (Nova Scotia). Through the provincial cancer registry, we identified all residents diagnosed with invasive CRC between 2001 and 2005 that underwent a non-emergent resection. Using anonymized administrative databases that are individually linked at the patient level, we obtained clinicodemographic, diagnostic, and treatment event data. Selected charts were reviewed to ensure completeness of chemotherapy data. Performance on six quality indicators and the percentage of patients achieving wait-time benchmarks for diagnosis, surgery, and adjuvant therapy were calculated. The relationship between quality indicators and wait-time benchmarks was examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Where an association was identified, patients who received ‘higher quality care’ had longer wait times. Individuals who received a complete preoperative colonoscopy were less likely to meet benchmarks for time from presentation to diagnosis and from diagnosis to surgery. Those who received an appropriate radiation oncology consultation were less likely to meet benchmarks for time from diagnosis to surgery and from surgery to adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: As governments and other organizations move forward with strategies to reduce wait times, they must also focus on how to define and monitor quality care, and consider the relationship between these two dimensions of health care. Similarly, when developing quality improvement initiatives, the impact on resource utilization and potential to create longer waits for care must be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3847107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38471072013-12-04 Timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study using administrative data Porter, Geoffrey Urquhart, Robin Kendell, Cynthia Bu, Jingyu McConnell, Yarrow Grunfeld, Eva BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: While efforts to improve cancer outcomes have typically focused on improving quality of care, recently, a growing emphasis has been placed on timely access to quality cancer care. This retrospective cohort study examines, at a population level, the relationship between quality and timeliness of colorectal cancer (CRC) care in a single Canadian province (Nova Scotia). Through the provincial cancer registry, we identified all residents diagnosed with invasive CRC between 2001 and 2005 that underwent a non-emergent resection. Using anonymized administrative databases that are individually linked at the patient level, we obtained clinicodemographic, diagnostic, and treatment event data. Selected charts were reviewed to ensure completeness of chemotherapy data. Performance on six quality indicators and the percentage of patients achieving wait-time benchmarks for diagnosis, surgery, and adjuvant therapy were calculated. The relationship between quality indicators and wait-time benchmarks was examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Where an association was identified, patients who received ‘higher quality care’ had longer wait times. Individuals who received a complete preoperative colonoscopy were less likely to meet benchmarks for time from presentation to diagnosis and from diagnosis to surgery. Those who received an appropriate radiation oncology consultation were less likely to meet benchmarks for time from diagnosis to surgery and from surgery to adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: As governments and other organizations move forward with strategies to reduce wait times, they must also focus on how to define and monitor quality care, and consider the relationship between these two dimensions of health care. Similarly, when developing quality improvement initiatives, the impact on resource utilization and potential to create longer waits for care must be considered. BioMed Central 2013-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3847107/ /pubmed/24010527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-355 Text en Copyright © 2013 Porter et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Porter, Geoffrey
Urquhart, Robin
Kendell, Cynthia
Bu, Jingyu
McConnell, Yarrow
Grunfeld, Eva
Timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study using administrative data
title Timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study using administrative data
title_full Timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study using administrative data
title_fullStr Timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study using administrative data
title_full_unstemmed Timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study using administrative data
title_short Timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study using administrative data
title_sort timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study using administrative data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-355
work_keys_str_mv AT portergeoffrey timelyaccessandqualityofcareincolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudyusingadministrativedata
AT urquhartrobin timelyaccessandqualityofcareincolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudyusingadministrativedata
AT kendellcynthia timelyaccessandqualityofcareincolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudyusingadministrativedata
AT bujingyu timelyaccessandqualityofcareincolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudyusingadministrativedata
AT mcconnellyarrow timelyaccessandqualityofcareincolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudyusingadministrativedata
AT grunfeldeva timelyaccessandqualityofcareincolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudyusingadministrativedata