Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of diclofenac diethylamine 1.16% gel in acute neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Neck pain (NP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder in primary care that frequently causes discomfort. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be used to reduce neck pain and associated inflammation and facilitate earlier recovery. Topical diclofenac diethylamine (DDEA) 1.16%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Predel, Hans-Georg, Giannetti, Bruno, Pabst, Helmut, Schaefer, Axel, Hug, Agnes M, Burnett, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23964752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-250
_version_ 1782293567922765824
author Predel, Hans-Georg
Giannetti, Bruno
Pabst, Helmut
Schaefer, Axel
Hug, Agnes M
Burnett, Ian
author_facet Predel, Hans-Georg
Giannetti, Bruno
Pabst, Helmut
Schaefer, Axel
Hug, Agnes M
Burnett, Ian
author_sort Predel, Hans-Georg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neck pain (NP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder in primary care that frequently causes discomfort. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be used to reduce neck pain and associated inflammation and facilitate earlier recovery. Topical diclofenac diethylamine (DDEA) 1.16% gel is clinically proven to be effective and well tolerated in acute and chronic musculoskeletal conditions, but until now no clinical data existed for its use in acute NP. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DDEA 1.16% gel compared with placebo gel in acute NP. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with acute NP (n = 72) were treated with DDEA 1.16% gel (2 g, 4x/day, for 5 days) or placebo. Efficacy assessments included pain-on-movement (POM), pain-at-rest (PAR), functional neck disability index (NDI) and response to treatment (decrease in POM by 50% after 48 h). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: The primary outcome, POM at 48 h, was statistically significantly lower with DDEA gel (19.5 mm) vs. placebo (56.9 mm) (p < 0.0001), representing a clinically relevant decrease from baseline (75% vs. 23%, respectively). All POM scores were significantly lower with DDEA gel vs. placebo from 1 h, as were PAR and NDI scores from first assessment (24 h) onwards (all p < 0.0001). Response to treatment was significantly higher with DDEA gel (94.4%) vs. placebo (8.3%) (p < 0.0001). There were no AEs with DDEA gel. CONCLUSIONS: DDEA 1.16% gel, which is available over-the-counter, was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of acute neck pain. The tools used to assess efficacy suggest that it quickly reduced neck pain and improved neck function. However, questions remain regarding the comparability and validity of such tools. Further studies will help ascertain whether DDEA 1.16% gel offers an alternative treatment option in this common, often debilitating condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01335724
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3847223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38472232013-12-04 Efficacy and safety of diclofenac diethylamine 1.16% gel in acute neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study Predel, Hans-Georg Giannetti, Bruno Pabst, Helmut Schaefer, Axel Hug, Agnes M Burnett, Ian BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Neck pain (NP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder in primary care that frequently causes discomfort. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be used to reduce neck pain and associated inflammation and facilitate earlier recovery. Topical diclofenac diethylamine (DDEA) 1.16% gel is clinically proven to be effective and well tolerated in acute and chronic musculoskeletal conditions, but until now no clinical data existed for its use in acute NP. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DDEA 1.16% gel compared with placebo gel in acute NP. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with acute NP (n = 72) were treated with DDEA 1.16% gel (2 g, 4x/day, for 5 days) or placebo. Efficacy assessments included pain-on-movement (POM), pain-at-rest (PAR), functional neck disability index (NDI) and response to treatment (decrease in POM by 50% after 48 h). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: The primary outcome, POM at 48 h, was statistically significantly lower with DDEA gel (19.5 mm) vs. placebo (56.9 mm) (p < 0.0001), representing a clinically relevant decrease from baseline (75% vs. 23%, respectively). All POM scores were significantly lower with DDEA gel vs. placebo from 1 h, as were PAR and NDI scores from first assessment (24 h) onwards (all p < 0.0001). Response to treatment was significantly higher with DDEA gel (94.4%) vs. placebo (8.3%) (p < 0.0001). There were no AEs with DDEA gel. CONCLUSIONS: DDEA 1.16% gel, which is available over-the-counter, was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of acute neck pain. The tools used to assess efficacy suggest that it quickly reduced neck pain and improved neck function. However, questions remain regarding the comparability and validity of such tools. Further studies will help ascertain whether DDEA 1.16% gel offers an alternative treatment option in this common, often debilitating condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01335724 BioMed Central 2013-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3847223/ /pubmed/23964752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-250 Text en Copyright © 2013 Predel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Predel, Hans-Georg
Giannetti, Bruno
Pabst, Helmut
Schaefer, Axel
Hug, Agnes M
Burnett, Ian
Efficacy and safety of diclofenac diethylamine 1.16% gel in acute neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title Efficacy and safety of diclofenac diethylamine 1.16% gel in acute neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title_full Efficacy and safety of diclofenac diethylamine 1.16% gel in acute neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of diclofenac diethylamine 1.16% gel in acute neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of diclofenac diethylamine 1.16% gel in acute neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title_short Efficacy and safety of diclofenac diethylamine 1.16% gel in acute neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title_sort efficacy and safety of diclofenac diethylamine 1.16% gel in acute neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23964752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-250
work_keys_str_mv AT predelhansgeorg efficacyandsafetyofdiclofenacdiethylamine116gelinacuteneckpainarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT giannettibruno efficacyandsafetyofdiclofenacdiethylamine116gelinacuteneckpainarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT pabsthelmut efficacyandsafetyofdiclofenacdiethylamine116gelinacuteneckpainarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT schaeferaxel efficacyandsafetyofdiclofenacdiethylamine116gelinacuteneckpainarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT hugagnesm efficacyandsafetyofdiclofenacdiethylamine116gelinacuteneckpainarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT burnettian efficacyandsafetyofdiclofenacdiethylamine116gelinacuteneckpainarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy