Cargando…

The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation

BACKGROUND: Under the circumstance of global population aging, the issue on how to facilitate the quality of life (QOL) for older people brings us grand challenge. On the way to solve this problem, it is inextricable to measure QOL for older people accurately at onset. This study is aimed at evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Rong, Wu, Shaomin, Hao, Yuantao, Gu, Jing, Fang, Jiqian, Cai, Nanqiao, Zhang, Jinxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24034698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-156
_version_ 1782293597200056320
author Liu, Rong
Wu, Shaomin
Hao, Yuantao
Gu, Jing
Fang, Jiqian
Cai, Nanqiao
Zhang, Jinxin
author_facet Liu, Rong
Wu, Shaomin
Hao, Yuantao
Gu, Jing
Fang, Jiqian
Cai, Nanqiao
Zhang, Jinxin
author_sort Liu, Rong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Under the circumstance of global population aging, the issue on how to facilitate the quality of life (QOL) for older people brings us grand challenge. On the way to solve this problem, it is inextricable to measure QOL for older people accurately at onset. This study is aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD). METHODS: We received 1005 valid WHOQOL-OLD questionnaires from 1050 respondents who were 60 and older by quota sampling method. To calculate the test-retest correlation coefficient we re-interviewed 101 participants from the community. Psychometric properties were evaluated from the aspect of feasibility, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity and discriminant validity. RESULTS: Missing item responses took up 0.0%-2.7% in the scale. The WHOQOL-OLD showed satisfactory reliability with Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients ranging from 0.711 (Social participation) to 0.842 (Sensory ability) for each domain. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) presenting test-retest reliability were all over 0.7. In Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was 0.084 (a little more than 0.08) and comparative fit index (CFI) 0.95 (>0.90) which meant acceptable construct validity. There were higher correlation coefficients between items and their hypothesized domains than other domains (P < 0.001), indicating good content validity. The results of t-test showed good discriminant validity of the WHOQOL-OLD between the healthy group and the unhealthy group (P < 0.0083). CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of WHOQOL-OLD showed good feasibility, reliability and validity in this study. However, before it can be used national-widely, further research should be conducted in other areas of China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3847352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38473522013-12-04 The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation Liu, Rong Wu, Shaomin Hao, Yuantao Gu, Jing Fang, Jiqian Cai, Nanqiao Zhang, Jinxin Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Under the circumstance of global population aging, the issue on how to facilitate the quality of life (QOL) for older people brings us grand challenge. On the way to solve this problem, it is inextricable to measure QOL for older people accurately at onset. This study is aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD). METHODS: We received 1005 valid WHOQOL-OLD questionnaires from 1050 respondents who were 60 and older by quota sampling method. To calculate the test-retest correlation coefficient we re-interviewed 101 participants from the community. Psychometric properties were evaluated from the aspect of feasibility, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity and discriminant validity. RESULTS: Missing item responses took up 0.0%-2.7% in the scale. The WHOQOL-OLD showed satisfactory reliability with Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients ranging from 0.711 (Social participation) to 0.842 (Sensory ability) for each domain. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) presenting test-retest reliability were all over 0.7. In Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was 0.084 (a little more than 0.08) and comparative fit index (CFI) 0.95 (>0.90) which meant acceptable construct validity. There were higher correlation coefficients between items and their hypothesized domains than other domains (P < 0.001), indicating good content validity. The results of t-test showed good discriminant validity of the WHOQOL-OLD between the healthy group and the unhealthy group (P < 0.0083). CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of WHOQOL-OLD showed good feasibility, reliability and validity in this study. However, before it can be used national-widely, further research should be conducted in other areas of China. BioMed Central 2013-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3847352/ /pubmed/24034698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-156 Text en Copyright © 2013 Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Rong
Wu, Shaomin
Hao, Yuantao
Gu, Jing
Fang, Jiqian
Cai, Nanqiao
Zhang, Jinxin
The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation
title The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation
title_full The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation
title_fullStr The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation
title_short The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation
title_sort chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (whoqol-old): psychometric evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24034698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-156
work_keys_str_mv AT liurong thechineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT wushaomin thechineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT haoyuantao thechineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT gujing thechineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT fangjiqian thechineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT cainanqiao thechineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT zhangjinxin thechineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT liurong chineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT wushaomin chineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT haoyuantao chineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT gujing chineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT fangjiqian chineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT cainanqiao chineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation
AT zhangjinxin chineseversionoftheworldhealthorganizationqualityoflifeinstrumentolderadultsmodulewhoqololdpsychometricevaluation