Cargando…
How within-country inequalities and co-coverage may affect LiST estimates of lives saved by scaling up interventions
Lives-saved estimates calculated by LiST include the implicit assumptions that there are no inequalities among different socioeconomic groups, and also that the likelihood of a mother or child receiving a given intervention is independent from the probability of receiving any other interventions. It...
Autores principales: | Victora, Cesar G, Barros, Aluisio J D, Malpica-Llanos, Tanya, Walker, Neff |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24564259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S24 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Overview of the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
por: Walker, Neff, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Assumptions and methods in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
por: Fox, Monica J, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) as a model for diarrhea mortality reduction
por: Fischer Walker, Christa L, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Introduction: reporting on updates in the scientific basis for the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
por: Walker, Neff, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Determining and Interpreting Inequalities in Coverage of Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Interventions
por: Barros, Aluísio J. D., et al.
Publicado: (2013)