Cargando…
A proposal for a novel impact factor as an alternative to the JCR impact factor
One disadvantage of the JCR impact factor, the most commonly used assessment tool for ranking and evaluating scientific journals, is its inability in distinguishing among different shapes of citation distribution curves, leading to unfair evaluation of journals in some cases. This paper aims to put...
Autores principales: | Yang, Zu-Guo, Zhang, Chun-Ting |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24296521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep03410 |
Ejemplares similares
-
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Celebrates Achievement of Its First Impact Factor in JCR
por: Jotz, Geraldo Pereira, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The Veterinary Quarterly 2017 JCR impact factor increased from 1.176 to 1.492
por: van der Kolk, J.H., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
2013 JCR Science Edition: Impact factors for the Journal of Applied Oral
Science and Brazilian Oral Research
por: Santos, Carlos F.
Publicado: (2014) -
Just-Released JCR Impact Factor Shows Strong and Steady Increase for
ABC Cardiol - 1.679 - A New Historical Record
por: Rochitte, Carlos E.
Publicado: (2019) -
An analysis of bibliometric indicators to JCR according to Benford’s law
por: Alves, Alexandre Donizeti, et al.
Publicado: (2016)