Cargando…

The effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets

BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigation was to assess the effects of different treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under orthodontic brackets. METHODS: Seventy-five intact premolars were randomly assigned to five groups. The teeth in groups 2 through 5 were immersed in a demineralis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moosavi, Horieh, Ahrari, Farzaneh, Mohamadipour, Hamideh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-2
_version_ 1782293678676508672
author Moosavi, Horieh
Ahrari, Farzaneh
Mohamadipour, Hamideh
author_facet Moosavi, Horieh
Ahrari, Farzaneh
Mohamadipour, Hamideh
author_sort Moosavi, Horieh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigation was to assess the effects of different treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under orthodontic brackets. METHODS: Seventy-five intact premolars were randomly assigned to five groups. The teeth in groups 2 through 5 were immersed in a demineralising solution for 16 weeks. In groups 1 (control) and 2 (demineralised/control), conventional acid etching was used. In group 3, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was applied on the enamel surface for 1 min after acid etching, and in group 4, Transbond Plus (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) self-etching primer (SEP) was used. The teeth in group 5 were treated with 2% sodium fluoride (NaF) for 4 min before etching. After bracket bonding, the specimens were thermocycled, sealed with nail varnish, immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine solution for 24 h and sectioned. Microleakage was measured under a stereomicroscope for the enamel-adhesive and adhesive-bracket interfaces of both occlusal and gingival sides. RESULTS: Demineralised teeth showed more microleakage at the enamel-adhesive interface on both occlusal and gingival sides compared to sound teeth, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.005). Treating the demineralised enamel with 5% NaOCl or Transbond Plus SEP was not effective in reducing microleakage. NaF treatment followed by acid etching of demineralised enamel resulted in significantly lower microleakage in most comparisons (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The use of 2% NaF on hypomineralised enamel before the bracket bonding procedure is an effective way to decrease microleakage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3847846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38478462015-04-07 The effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets Moosavi, Horieh Ahrari, Farzaneh Mohamadipour, Hamideh Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigation was to assess the effects of different treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under orthodontic brackets. METHODS: Seventy-five intact premolars were randomly assigned to five groups. The teeth in groups 2 through 5 were immersed in a demineralising solution for 16 weeks. In groups 1 (control) and 2 (demineralised/control), conventional acid etching was used. In group 3, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was applied on the enamel surface for 1 min after acid etching, and in group 4, Transbond Plus (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) self-etching primer (SEP) was used. The teeth in group 5 were treated with 2% sodium fluoride (NaF) for 4 min before etching. After bracket bonding, the specimens were thermocycled, sealed with nail varnish, immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine solution for 24 h and sectioned. Microleakage was measured under a stereomicroscope for the enamel-adhesive and adhesive-bracket interfaces of both occlusal and gingival sides. RESULTS: Demineralised teeth showed more microleakage at the enamel-adhesive interface on both occlusal and gingival sides compared to sound teeth, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.005). Treating the demineralised enamel with 5% NaOCl or Transbond Plus SEP was not effective in reducing microleakage. NaF treatment followed by acid etching of demineralised enamel resulted in significantly lower microleakage in most comparisons (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The use of 2% NaF on hypomineralised enamel before the bracket bonding procedure is an effective way to decrease microleakage. Springer 2013-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3847846/ /pubmed/24325863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-2 Text en Copyright © 2013 Moosavi et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Moosavi, Horieh
Ahrari, Farzaneh
Mohamadipour, Hamideh
The effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets
title The effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets
title_full The effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets
title_fullStr The effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets
title_short The effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets
title_sort effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-2
work_keys_str_mv AT moosavihorieh theeffectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsofdemineralisedenamelonmicroleakageundermetalorthodonticbrackets
AT ahrarifarzaneh theeffectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsofdemineralisedenamelonmicroleakageundermetalorthodonticbrackets
AT mohamadipourhamideh theeffectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsofdemineralisedenamelonmicroleakageundermetalorthodonticbrackets
AT moosavihorieh effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsofdemineralisedenamelonmicroleakageundermetalorthodonticbrackets
AT ahrarifarzaneh effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsofdemineralisedenamelonmicroleakageundermetalorthodonticbrackets
AT mohamadipourhamideh effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsofdemineralisedenamelonmicroleakageundermetalorthodonticbrackets