Cargando…

Team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Team-based learning (TBL) is an effective teaching method for medical students. It improves knowledge acquisition and has benefits regarding learner engagement and teamwork skills. In medical education it is predominately used with undergraduates but has potential benefits for training c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMullen, Isabel, Cartledge, Jonathan, Levine, Ruth, Iversen, Amy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24025540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-124
_version_ 1782293682283610112
author McMullen, Isabel
Cartledge, Jonathan
Levine, Ruth
Iversen, Amy
author_facet McMullen, Isabel
Cartledge, Jonathan
Levine, Ruth
Iversen, Amy
author_sort McMullen, Isabel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Team-based learning (TBL) is an effective teaching method for medical students. It improves knowledge acquisition and has benefits regarding learner engagement and teamwork skills. In medical education it is predominately used with undergraduates but has potential benefits for training clinicians. The aims of this study were to examine the impact of TBL in a sample of psychiatrists in terms of classroom engagement, attitudes towards teamwork, learner views and experiences of TBL. METHODS: Forty-four psychiatry residents participated in an Addictions Psychiatry TBL module. Mixed-methods were used for evaluation. Self-rated measures of classroom engagement (Classroom Engagement Survey, CES) were compared with conventional lectures, and attitudes regarding the value of teams (Value of Teams Scale, VTS) were compared before and after the module. Independent t-tests were used to compare ‘lecture’ CES scores with TBL CES scores and pre and post scores for the VTS. Feedback questionnaires were completed. Interviews were conducted with a subset of residents and transcripts analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight residents completed post-course measures (response rate 63.6%). Seven participants volunteered for qualitative interviews–one from each team. There was a significant difference in the mean CES score lectures compared to TBL (p < 0.001) but no difference was found in mean VTS score pre and post for either subscale (p = 0.519; p = 0.809). All items on the feedback questionnaire were positively rated except two regarding session preparation. The qualitative analysis generated seven themes under four domains: ‘Learning in teams’, ‘Impact on the individual learner’, ‘Relationship with the teacher’ and ‘Efficiency and effectiveness of the learning process’. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of residents, TBL significantly improved learner-rated classroom engagement and seemed to promote interactivity between learners. TBL was generally well-received, although required learners to prepare for class which was difficult for some. TBL did not change these clinicians’ views about teamwork.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3847866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38478662013-12-04 Team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study McMullen, Isabel Cartledge, Jonathan Levine, Ruth Iversen, Amy BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Team-based learning (TBL) is an effective teaching method for medical students. It improves knowledge acquisition and has benefits regarding learner engagement and teamwork skills. In medical education it is predominately used with undergraduates but has potential benefits for training clinicians. The aims of this study were to examine the impact of TBL in a sample of psychiatrists in terms of classroom engagement, attitudes towards teamwork, learner views and experiences of TBL. METHODS: Forty-four psychiatry residents participated in an Addictions Psychiatry TBL module. Mixed-methods were used for evaluation. Self-rated measures of classroom engagement (Classroom Engagement Survey, CES) were compared with conventional lectures, and attitudes regarding the value of teams (Value of Teams Scale, VTS) were compared before and after the module. Independent t-tests were used to compare ‘lecture’ CES scores with TBL CES scores and pre and post scores for the VTS. Feedback questionnaires were completed. Interviews were conducted with a subset of residents and transcripts analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight residents completed post-course measures (response rate 63.6%). Seven participants volunteered for qualitative interviews–one from each team. There was a significant difference in the mean CES score lectures compared to TBL (p < 0.001) but no difference was found in mean VTS score pre and post for either subscale (p = 0.519; p = 0.809). All items on the feedback questionnaire were positively rated except two regarding session preparation. The qualitative analysis generated seven themes under four domains: ‘Learning in teams’, ‘Impact on the individual learner’, ‘Relationship with the teacher’ and ‘Efficiency and effectiveness of the learning process’. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of residents, TBL significantly improved learner-rated classroom engagement and seemed to promote interactivity between learners. TBL was generally well-received, although required learners to prepare for class which was difficult for some. TBL did not change these clinicians’ views about teamwork. BioMed Central 2013-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3847866/ /pubmed/24025540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-124 Text en Copyright © 2013 McMullen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McMullen, Isabel
Cartledge, Jonathan
Levine, Ruth
Iversen, Amy
Team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study
title Team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study
title_full Team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study
title_short Team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study
title_sort team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24025540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-124
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmullenisabel teambasedlearningforpsychiatryresidentsamixedmethodsstudy
AT cartledgejonathan teambasedlearningforpsychiatryresidentsamixedmethodsstudy
AT levineruth teambasedlearningforpsychiatryresidentsamixedmethodsstudy
AT iversenamy teambasedlearningforpsychiatryresidentsamixedmethodsstudy