Cargando…

Comparison of Physical Therapy with Energy Healing for Improving Range of Motion in Subjects with Restricted Shoulder Mobility

Two forms of energy healing, Reconnective Healing (RH) and Reiki, which involve light or no touch, were tested for efficacy against physical therapy (PT) for increasing limited range of motion (ROM) of arm elevation in the scapular plane. Participants were assigned to one of 5 groups: PT, Reiki, RH,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linda Baldwin, Ann, Fullmer, Kirstin, Schwartz, Gary E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24327820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/329731
_version_ 1782293697237352448
author Linda Baldwin, Ann
Fullmer, Kirstin
Schwartz, Gary E.
author_facet Linda Baldwin, Ann
Fullmer, Kirstin
Schwartz, Gary E.
author_sort Linda Baldwin, Ann
collection PubMed
description Two forms of energy healing, Reconnective Healing (RH) and Reiki, which involve light or no touch, were tested for efficacy against physical therapy (PT) for increasing limited range of motion (ROM) of arm elevation in the scapular plane. Participants were assigned to one of 5 groups: PT, Reiki, RH, Sham Healing, or no treatment. Except for no treatment, participants were blinded as to grouping. Range of Motion, self-reported pain, and heart rate variability (HRV) were assessed before and after a 10-minute session. On average, for PT, Reiki, RH, Sham Healing, and no treatment, respectively, ROM increased by 12°, 20°, 26°, 0.6°, and 3° and pain score decreased by 11.5%, 10.1%, 23.9%, 15.4%, and 0%. Physical therapy, Reiki, and RH were more effective than Sham Healing for increasing ROM (PT: F = 8.05, P = 0.008; Reiki: F = 10.48, P = 0.003; RH: F = 30.19, P < 0.001). It is possible that this improvement was not mediated by myofascial release because the subjects' HRV did not change, suggesting no significant increase in vagal activity. Sham treatment significantly reduced pain compared to no treatment (F = 8.4, P = 0.007) and was just as effective as PT, Reiki, and RH. It is the authors' opinion that the accompanying pain relief is a placebo effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3847956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38479562013-12-10 Comparison of Physical Therapy with Energy Healing for Improving Range of Motion in Subjects with Restricted Shoulder Mobility Linda Baldwin, Ann Fullmer, Kirstin Schwartz, Gary E. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article Two forms of energy healing, Reconnective Healing (RH) and Reiki, which involve light or no touch, were tested for efficacy against physical therapy (PT) for increasing limited range of motion (ROM) of arm elevation in the scapular plane. Participants were assigned to one of 5 groups: PT, Reiki, RH, Sham Healing, or no treatment. Except for no treatment, participants were blinded as to grouping. Range of Motion, self-reported pain, and heart rate variability (HRV) were assessed before and after a 10-minute session. On average, for PT, Reiki, RH, Sham Healing, and no treatment, respectively, ROM increased by 12°, 20°, 26°, 0.6°, and 3° and pain score decreased by 11.5%, 10.1%, 23.9%, 15.4%, and 0%. Physical therapy, Reiki, and RH were more effective than Sham Healing for increasing ROM (PT: F = 8.05, P = 0.008; Reiki: F = 10.48, P = 0.003; RH: F = 30.19, P < 0.001). It is possible that this improvement was not mediated by myofascial release because the subjects' HRV did not change, suggesting no significant increase in vagal activity. Sham treatment significantly reduced pain compared to no treatment (F = 8.4, P = 0.007) and was just as effective as PT, Reiki, and RH. It is the authors' opinion that the accompanying pain relief is a placebo effect. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3847956/ /pubmed/24327820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/329731 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ann Linda Baldwin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Linda Baldwin, Ann
Fullmer, Kirstin
Schwartz, Gary E.
Comparison of Physical Therapy with Energy Healing for Improving Range of Motion in Subjects with Restricted Shoulder Mobility
title Comparison of Physical Therapy with Energy Healing for Improving Range of Motion in Subjects with Restricted Shoulder Mobility
title_full Comparison of Physical Therapy with Energy Healing for Improving Range of Motion in Subjects with Restricted Shoulder Mobility
title_fullStr Comparison of Physical Therapy with Energy Healing for Improving Range of Motion in Subjects with Restricted Shoulder Mobility
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Physical Therapy with Energy Healing for Improving Range of Motion in Subjects with Restricted Shoulder Mobility
title_short Comparison of Physical Therapy with Energy Healing for Improving Range of Motion in Subjects with Restricted Shoulder Mobility
title_sort comparison of physical therapy with energy healing for improving range of motion in subjects with restricted shoulder mobility
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3847956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24327820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/329731
work_keys_str_mv AT lindabaldwinann comparisonofphysicaltherapywithenergyhealingforimprovingrangeofmotioninsubjectswithrestrictedshouldermobility
AT fullmerkirstin comparisonofphysicaltherapywithenergyhealingforimprovingrangeofmotioninsubjectswithrestrictedshouldermobility
AT schwartzgarye comparisonofphysicaltherapywithenergyhealingforimprovingrangeofmotioninsubjectswithrestrictedshouldermobility