Cargando…

Caudate lobe resections: a single-center experience and evaluation of factors predictive of outcomes

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing frequency of liver resection for multiple types of disease, caudate lobe resection remains a rare surgical event. The goal of this study is to review our experience and evaluate possible predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing caudate lobectomy. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Philips, Prejesh, Farmer, Russell W, Scoggins, Charles R, McMasters, Kelly M, Martin, Robert CG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-220
_version_ 1782293778766233600
author Philips, Prejesh
Farmer, Russell W
Scoggins, Charles R
McMasters, Kelly M
Martin, Robert CG
author_facet Philips, Prejesh
Farmer, Russell W
Scoggins, Charles R
McMasters, Kelly M
Martin, Robert CG
author_sort Philips, Prejesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing frequency of liver resection for multiple types of disease, caudate lobe resection remains a rare surgical event. The goal of this study is to review our experience and evaluate possible predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing caudate lobectomy. METHODS: We reviewed a 1,900-patient prospective hepato-pancreatico-biliary database from January 2000 to December 2011, identifying 36 hepatectomy patients undergoing caudate lobe resection. Clinicopathologic characteristic and outcome data were compared using chi-square, T-test, ANOVA, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis. Primary endpoints were the incidence and severity of complications, and secondary endpoints were blood loss, hospital stay, and transfusion requirements. Patients were also divided in two groups with group A being patients operated on before December 2007 and group B after 2007. We compared the demographics, risk factors, complication rates, and operative details between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent caudate lobe resection for cholangiocarcinoma (47.2%), metastatic colorectal cancer (36.1%), hepatocellular carcinoma (8.3%), or benign disease (8.3%). Nine patients (29%) had additional liver resection. Median overall survival (OS) was 21 months. Complications occurred in 52.7% (19/36) of patients with a median grade of 2. Tobacco abuse was associated with an increased risk of operative complications (73.3% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.03). Prior history of cardiac disease was associated with a higher complication rate (87% vs. 42%, p = 0.03). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, biliary procedures, hepatitis, and prior major abdominal surgery were not predictive of complications. Major complication was also predicted by the volume of RBC transfusion (2.7 vs. 4.1 units, p = 0.003). In our subgroup analysis of the patients undergoing surgery before and after 2007, the two groups were well matched based on age, comorbidities, and risk factors. The complication rates and rates of high-grade complications were similar, but blood loss (600 ml vs. 400 ml, p = 0.03), inflow occlusion time (Pringle time 12.6 vs. 6, p = 0.00), and hospital stay (9.5 vs. 7 days, p = 0.01) were significantly lower in group B. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate patient selection, caudate lobe resection is an effective component of surgery for hepatic disease. Tobacco use and prior cardiac history increase the risk of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3848559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38485592013-12-04 Caudate lobe resections: a single-center experience and evaluation of factors predictive of outcomes Philips, Prejesh Farmer, Russell W Scoggins, Charles R McMasters, Kelly M Martin, Robert CG World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing frequency of liver resection for multiple types of disease, caudate lobe resection remains a rare surgical event. The goal of this study is to review our experience and evaluate possible predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing caudate lobectomy. METHODS: We reviewed a 1,900-patient prospective hepato-pancreatico-biliary database from January 2000 to December 2011, identifying 36 hepatectomy patients undergoing caudate lobe resection. Clinicopathologic characteristic and outcome data were compared using chi-square, T-test, ANOVA, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis. Primary endpoints were the incidence and severity of complications, and secondary endpoints were blood loss, hospital stay, and transfusion requirements. Patients were also divided in two groups with group A being patients operated on before December 2007 and group B after 2007. We compared the demographics, risk factors, complication rates, and operative details between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent caudate lobe resection for cholangiocarcinoma (47.2%), metastatic colorectal cancer (36.1%), hepatocellular carcinoma (8.3%), or benign disease (8.3%). Nine patients (29%) had additional liver resection. Median overall survival (OS) was 21 months. Complications occurred in 52.7% (19/36) of patients with a median grade of 2. Tobacco abuse was associated with an increased risk of operative complications (73.3% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.03). Prior history of cardiac disease was associated with a higher complication rate (87% vs. 42%, p = 0.03). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, biliary procedures, hepatitis, and prior major abdominal surgery were not predictive of complications. Major complication was also predicted by the volume of RBC transfusion (2.7 vs. 4.1 units, p = 0.003). In our subgroup analysis of the patients undergoing surgery before and after 2007, the two groups were well matched based on age, comorbidities, and risk factors. The complication rates and rates of high-grade complications were similar, but blood loss (600 ml vs. 400 ml, p = 0.03), inflow occlusion time (Pringle time 12.6 vs. 6, p = 0.00), and hospital stay (9.5 vs. 7 days, p = 0.01) were significantly lower in group B. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate patient selection, caudate lobe resection is an effective component of surgery for hepatic disease. Tobacco use and prior cardiac history increase the risk of complications. BioMed Central 2013-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3848559/ /pubmed/24010947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-220 Text en Copyright © 2013 Philips et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Philips, Prejesh
Farmer, Russell W
Scoggins, Charles R
McMasters, Kelly M
Martin, Robert CG
Caudate lobe resections: a single-center experience and evaluation of factors predictive of outcomes
title Caudate lobe resections: a single-center experience and evaluation of factors predictive of outcomes
title_full Caudate lobe resections: a single-center experience and evaluation of factors predictive of outcomes
title_fullStr Caudate lobe resections: a single-center experience and evaluation of factors predictive of outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Caudate lobe resections: a single-center experience and evaluation of factors predictive of outcomes
title_short Caudate lobe resections: a single-center experience and evaluation of factors predictive of outcomes
title_sort caudate lobe resections: a single-center experience and evaluation of factors predictive of outcomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-220
work_keys_str_mv AT philipsprejesh caudateloberesectionsasinglecenterexperienceandevaluationoffactorspredictiveofoutcomes
AT farmerrussellw caudateloberesectionsasinglecenterexperienceandevaluationoffactorspredictiveofoutcomes
AT scogginscharlesr caudateloberesectionsasinglecenterexperienceandevaluationoffactorspredictiveofoutcomes
AT mcmasterskellym caudateloberesectionsasinglecenterexperienceandevaluationoffactorspredictiveofoutcomes
AT martinrobertcg caudateloberesectionsasinglecenterexperienceandevaluationoffactorspredictiveofoutcomes