Cargando…
Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the kne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-292 |
_version_ | 1782293778986434560 |
---|---|
author | Beard, David Price, Andrew Cook, Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Ray Carr, Andrew Campbell, Marion Doll, Helen Campbell, Helen Arden, Nigel Cooper, Cushla Davies, Loretta Murray, David |
author_facet | Beard, David Price, Andrew Cook, Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Ray Carr, Andrew Campbell, Marion Doll, Helen Campbell, Helen Arden, Nigel Cooper, Cushla Davies, Loretta Murray, David |
author_sort | Beard, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology. The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. METHODS/DESIGN: The design of the study is a single layer multicentre superiority type randomised controlled trial of unilateral knee replacement patients. Blinding will not be possible as the surgical scars for each procedure differ. We aim to recruit 500 patients from approximately 28 secondary care orthopaedic units from across the UK including district general and teaching hospitals. Participants will be randomised to either UKR or TKR. Randomisation will occur using a web-based randomisation system. The study is pragmatic in terms of implant selection for the knee replacement operation. Participants will be followed up for 5 years. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score, which will be collected via questionnaires at 2 months, 1 year and then annually to 5 years. Secondary outcomes will include cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction and complications data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03013488; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01352247 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3848560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38485602013-12-04 Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Beard, David Price, Andrew Cook, Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Ray Carr, Andrew Campbell, Marion Doll, Helen Campbell, Helen Arden, Nigel Cooper, Cushla Davies, Loretta Murray, David Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology. The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. METHODS/DESIGN: The design of the study is a single layer multicentre superiority type randomised controlled trial of unilateral knee replacement patients. Blinding will not be possible as the surgical scars for each procedure differ. We aim to recruit 500 patients from approximately 28 secondary care orthopaedic units from across the UK including district general and teaching hospitals. Participants will be randomised to either UKR or TKR. Randomisation will occur using a web-based randomisation system. The study is pragmatic in terms of implant selection for the knee replacement operation. Participants will be followed up for 5 years. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score, which will be collected via questionnaires at 2 months, 1 year and then annually to 5 years. Secondary outcomes will include cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction and complications data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03013488; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01352247 BioMed Central 2013-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3848560/ /pubmed/24028414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-292 Text en Copyright © 2013 Beard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Beard, David Price, Andrew Cook, Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Ray Carr, Andrew Campbell, Marion Doll, Helen Campbell, Helen Arden, Nigel Cooper, Cushla Davies, Loretta Murray, David Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | total or partial knee arthroplasty trial - topkat: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-292 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bearddavid totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT priceandrew totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cookjonathan totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fitzpatrickray totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT carrandrew totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT campbellmarion totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dollhelen totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT campbellhelen totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ardennigel totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT coopercushla totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT daviesloretta totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT murraydavid totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |