Cargando…

Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the kne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beard, David, Price, Andrew, Cook, Jonathan, Fitzpatrick, Ray, Carr, Andrew, Campbell, Marion, Doll, Helen, Campbell, Helen, Arden, Nigel, Cooper, Cushla, Davies, Loretta, Murray, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-292
_version_ 1782293778986434560
author Beard, David
Price, Andrew
Cook, Jonathan
Fitzpatrick, Ray
Carr, Andrew
Campbell, Marion
Doll, Helen
Campbell, Helen
Arden, Nigel
Cooper, Cushla
Davies, Loretta
Murray, David
author_facet Beard, David
Price, Andrew
Cook, Jonathan
Fitzpatrick, Ray
Carr, Andrew
Campbell, Marion
Doll, Helen
Campbell, Helen
Arden, Nigel
Cooper, Cushla
Davies, Loretta
Murray, David
author_sort Beard, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology. The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. METHODS/DESIGN: The design of the study is a single layer multicentre superiority type randomised controlled trial of unilateral knee replacement patients. Blinding will not be possible as the surgical scars for each procedure differ. We aim to recruit 500 patients from approximately 28 secondary care orthopaedic units from across the UK including district general and teaching hospitals. Participants will be randomised to either UKR or TKR. Randomisation will occur using a web-based randomisation system. The study is pragmatic in terms of implant selection for the knee replacement operation. Participants will be followed up for 5 years. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score, which will be collected via questionnaires at 2 months, 1 year and then annually to 5 years. Secondary outcomes will include cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction and complications data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03013488; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01352247
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3848560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38485602013-12-04 Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Beard, David Price, Andrew Cook, Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Ray Carr, Andrew Campbell, Marion Doll, Helen Campbell, Helen Arden, Nigel Cooper, Cushla Davies, Loretta Murray, David Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology. The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. METHODS/DESIGN: The design of the study is a single layer multicentre superiority type randomised controlled trial of unilateral knee replacement patients. Blinding will not be possible as the surgical scars for each procedure differ. We aim to recruit 500 patients from approximately 28 secondary care orthopaedic units from across the UK including district general and teaching hospitals. Participants will be randomised to either UKR or TKR. Randomisation will occur using a web-based randomisation system. The study is pragmatic in terms of implant selection for the knee replacement operation. Participants will be followed up for 5 years. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score, which will be collected via questionnaires at 2 months, 1 year and then annually to 5 years. Secondary outcomes will include cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction and complications data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03013488; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01352247 BioMed Central 2013-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3848560/ /pubmed/24028414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-292 Text en Copyright © 2013 Beard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Beard, David
Price, Andrew
Cook, Jonathan
Fitzpatrick, Ray
Carr, Andrew
Campbell, Marion
Doll, Helen
Campbell, Helen
Arden, Nigel
Cooper, Cushla
Davies, Loretta
Murray, David
Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort total or partial knee arthroplasty trial - topkat: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-292
work_keys_str_mv AT bearddavid totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT priceandrew totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cookjonathan totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fitzpatrickray totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT carrandrew totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT campbellmarion totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dollhelen totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT campbellhelen totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ardennigel totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coopercushla totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daviesloretta totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT murraydavid totalorpartialkneearthroplastytrialtopkatstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial