Cargando…

Test-retest reliability of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND: The ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ (Eyes) test is an advanced test of theory of mind. It is widely used to assess individual differences in social cognition and emotion recognition across different groups and cultures. The present study examined distributions of responses and scores on a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernández-Abascal, Enrique G, Cabello, Rosario, Fernández-Berrocal, Pablo, Baron-Cohen, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24020728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-4-33
_version_ 1782293818246168576
author Fernández-Abascal, Enrique G
Cabello, Rosario
Fernández-Berrocal, Pablo
Baron-Cohen, Simon
author_facet Fernández-Abascal, Enrique G
Cabello, Rosario
Fernández-Berrocal, Pablo
Baron-Cohen, Simon
author_sort Fernández-Abascal, Enrique G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ (Eyes) test is an advanced test of theory of mind. It is widely used to assess individual differences in social cognition and emotion recognition across different groups and cultures. The present study examined distributions of responses and scores on a Spanish version of the test in a non-clinical Spanish adult population, and assessed test-retest reliability over a 1-year interval. METHODS: A total of 358 undergraduates of both sexes, age 18 to 65 years, completed the Spanish version of the test twice over an interval of 1 year. The Bland-Altman method was used to calculate test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Distributions of responses and scores were optimal. Test-retest reliability for total score on the Eyes test was .63 (P <.01), based on the intraclass correlation coefficient. Test-retest reliability using the Bland-Altman method was fairly good. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study providing evidence that the Eyes test is reliable and stable over a 1-year period, in a non-clinical sample of adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3848772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38487722013-12-04 Test-retest reliability of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study Fernández-Abascal, Enrique G Cabello, Rosario Fernández-Berrocal, Pablo Baron-Cohen, Simon Mol Autism Research BACKGROUND: The ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ (Eyes) test is an advanced test of theory of mind. It is widely used to assess individual differences in social cognition and emotion recognition across different groups and cultures. The present study examined distributions of responses and scores on a Spanish version of the test in a non-clinical Spanish adult population, and assessed test-retest reliability over a 1-year interval. METHODS: A total of 358 undergraduates of both sexes, age 18 to 65 years, completed the Spanish version of the test twice over an interval of 1 year. The Bland-Altman method was used to calculate test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Distributions of responses and scores were optimal. Test-retest reliability for total score on the Eyes test was .63 (P <.01), based on the intraclass correlation coefficient. Test-retest reliability using the Bland-Altman method was fairly good. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study providing evidence that the Eyes test is reliable and stable over a 1-year period, in a non-clinical sample of adults. BioMed Central 2013-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3848772/ /pubmed/24020728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-4-33 Text en Copyright © 2013 Fernández-Abascal et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Fernández-Abascal, Enrique G
Cabello, Rosario
Fernández-Berrocal, Pablo
Baron-Cohen, Simon
Test-retest reliability of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study
title Test-retest reliability of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study
title_full Test-retest reliability of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study
title_fullStr Test-retest reliability of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Test-retest reliability of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study
title_short Test-retest reliability of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study
title_sort test-retest reliability of the ‘reading the mind in the eyes’ test: a one-year follow-up study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24020728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-4-33
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezabascalenriqueg testretestreliabilityofthereadingthemindintheeyestestaoneyearfollowupstudy
AT cabellorosario testretestreliabilityofthereadingthemindintheeyestestaoneyearfollowupstudy
AT fernandezberrocalpablo testretestreliabilityofthereadingthemindintheeyestestaoneyearfollowupstudy
AT baroncohensimon testretestreliabilityofthereadingthemindintheeyestestaoneyearfollowupstudy