Cargando…

Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice

BACKGROUND: Until now, no kinetic model was described for the oncologic tracer [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine ([(18)F]FCho), so it was aimed to validate a proper model, which is easy to implement and allows tracer quantification in tissues. METHODS: Based on the metabolic profile, two types of compartme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slaets, Dominique, De Vos, Filip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24034278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-66
_version_ 1782293820751216640
author Slaets, Dominique
De Vos, Filip
author_facet Slaets, Dominique
De Vos, Filip
author_sort Slaets, Dominique
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Until now, no kinetic model was described for the oncologic tracer [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine ([(18)F]FCho), so it was aimed to validate a proper model, which is easy to implement and allows tracer quantification in tissues. METHODS: Based on the metabolic profile, two types of compartmental models were evaluated. One is a 3C2i model, which contains three tissue compartments and two input functions and corrects for possible [(18)F]fluorobetaine ([(18)F]FBet) uptake by the tissues. On the other hand, a two-tissue-compartment model (2C1i) was evaluated. Moreover, a comparison, based on intra-observer variability, was made between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis. RESULTS: Determination of the [(18)F]FCho-to-[(18)F]FBet uptake ratios in tissues and evaluation of the fitting of both kinetic models indicated that corrections for [(18)F]FBet uptake are not mandatory. In addition, [(18)F]FCho uptake is well described by the 2C1i model and by graphical analysis by means of the Patlak plot. CONCLUSIONS: The Patlak plot is a reliable, precise, and robust method to quantify [(18)F]FCho uptake independent of scan time or plasma clearance. In addition, it is easily implemented, even under non-equilibrium conditions and without creating additional errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3848786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38487862013-12-06 Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice Slaets, Dominique De Vos, Filip EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Until now, no kinetic model was described for the oncologic tracer [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine ([(18)F]FCho), so it was aimed to validate a proper model, which is easy to implement and allows tracer quantification in tissues. METHODS: Based on the metabolic profile, two types of compartmental models were evaluated. One is a 3C2i model, which contains three tissue compartments and two input functions and corrects for possible [(18)F]fluorobetaine ([(18)F]FBet) uptake by the tissues. On the other hand, a two-tissue-compartment model (2C1i) was evaluated. Moreover, a comparison, based on intra-observer variability, was made between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis. RESULTS: Determination of the [(18)F]FCho-to-[(18)F]FBet uptake ratios in tissues and evaluation of the fitting of both kinetic models indicated that corrections for [(18)F]FBet uptake are not mandatory. In addition, [(18)F]FCho uptake is well described by the 2C1i model and by graphical analysis by means of the Patlak plot. CONCLUSIONS: The Patlak plot is a reliable, precise, and robust method to quantify [(18)F]FCho uptake independent of scan time or plasma clearance. In addition, it is easily implemented, even under non-equilibrium conditions and without creating additional errors. Springer 2013-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3848786/ /pubmed/24034278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-66 Text en Copyright © 2013 Slaets and De Vos; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Slaets, Dominique
De Vos, Filip
Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice
title Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice
title_full Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice
title_fullStr Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice
title_short Comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice
title_sort comparison between kinetic modelling and graphical analysis for the quantification of [(18)f]fluoromethylcholine uptake in mice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24034278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-66
work_keys_str_mv AT slaetsdominique comparisonbetweenkineticmodellingandgraphicalanalysisforthequantificationof18ffluoromethylcholineuptakeinmice
AT devosfilip comparisonbetweenkineticmodellingandgraphicalanalysisforthequantificationof18ffluoromethylcholineuptakeinmice