Cargando…

Biogeography, phylogeny, and morphological evolution of central Texas cave and spring salamanders

BACKGROUND: Subterranean faunal radiations can result in complex patterns of morphological divergence involving both convergent or parallel phenotypic evolution and cryptic species diversity. Salamanders of the genus Eurycea in central Texas provide a particularly challenging example with respect to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bendik, Nathan F, Meik, Jesse M, Gluesenkamp, Andrew G, Roelke, Corey E, Chippindale, Paul T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24044519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-201
_version_ 1782293821661380608
author Bendik, Nathan F
Meik, Jesse M
Gluesenkamp, Andrew G
Roelke, Corey E
Chippindale, Paul T
author_facet Bendik, Nathan F
Meik, Jesse M
Gluesenkamp, Andrew G
Roelke, Corey E
Chippindale, Paul T
author_sort Bendik, Nathan F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Subterranean faunal radiations can result in complex patterns of morphological divergence involving both convergent or parallel phenotypic evolution and cryptic species diversity. Salamanders of the genus Eurycea in central Texas provide a particularly challenging example with respect to phylogeny reconstruction, biogeography and taxonomy. These predominantly aquatic species inhabit karst limestone aquifers and spring outflows, and exhibit a wide range of morphological and genetic variation. We extensively sampled spring and cave populations of six Eurycea species within this group (eastern Blepsimolge clade), to reconstruct their phylogenetic and biogeographic history using mtDNA and examine patterns and origins of cave- and surface-associated morphological variation. RESULTS: Genetic divergence is generally low, and many populations share ancestral haplotypes and/or show evidence of introgression. This pattern likely indicates a recent radiation coupled with a complex history of intermittent connections within the aquatic karst system. Cave populations that exhibit the most extreme troglobitic morphologies show no or very low divergence from surface populations and are geographically interspersed among them, suggesting multiple instances of rapid, parallel phenotypic evolution. Morphological variation is diffuse among cave populations; this is in contrast to surface populations, which form a tight cluster in morphospace. Unexpectedly, our analyses reveal two distinct and previously unrecognized morphological groups encompassing multiple species that are not correlated with spring or cave habitat, phylogeny or geography, and may be due to developmental plasticity. CONCLUSIONS: The evolutionary history of this group of spring- and cave-dwelling salamanders reflects patterns of intermittent isolation and gene flow influenced by complex hydrogeologic dynamics that are characteristic of karst regions. Shallow genetic divergences among several species, evidence of genetic exchange, and nested relationships across morphologically disparate cave and spring forms suggests that cave invasion was recent and many troglobitic morphologies arose independently. These patterns are consistent with an adaptive-shift hypothesis of divergence, which has been proposed to explain diversification in other karst fauna. While cave and surface forms often do not appear to be genetically isolated, morphological diversity within and among populations may be maintained by developmental plasticity, selection, or a combination thereof.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3848792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38487922013-12-04 Biogeography, phylogeny, and morphological evolution of central Texas cave and spring salamanders Bendik, Nathan F Meik, Jesse M Gluesenkamp, Andrew G Roelke, Corey E Chippindale, Paul T BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Subterranean faunal radiations can result in complex patterns of morphological divergence involving both convergent or parallel phenotypic evolution and cryptic species diversity. Salamanders of the genus Eurycea in central Texas provide a particularly challenging example with respect to phylogeny reconstruction, biogeography and taxonomy. These predominantly aquatic species inhabit karst limestone aquifers and spring outflows, and exhibit a wide range of morphological and genetic variation. We extensively sampled spring and cave populations of six Eurycea species within this group (eastern Blepsimolge clade), to reconstruct their phylogenetic and biogeographic history using mtDNA and examine patterns and origins of cave- and surface-associated morphological variation. RESULTS: Genetic divergence is generally low, and many populations share ancestral haplotypes and/or show evidence of introgression. This pattern likely indicates a recent radiation coupled with a complex history of intermittent connections within the aquatic karst system. Cave populations that exhibit the most extreme troglobitic morphologies show no or very low divergence from surface populations and are geographically interspersed among them, suggesting multiple instances of rapid, parallel phenotypic evolution. Morphological variation is diffuse among cave populations; this is in contrast to surface populations, which form a tight cluster in morphospace. Unexpectedly, our analyses reveal two distinct and previously unrecognized morphological groups encompassing multiple species that are not correlated with spring or cave habitat, phylogeny or geography, and may be due to developmental plasticity. CONCLUSIONS: The evolutionary history of this group of spring- and cave-dwelling salamanders reflects patterns of intermittent isolation and gene flow influenced by complex hydrogeologic dynamics that are characteristic of karst regions. Shallow genetic divergences among several species, evidence of genetic exchange, and nested relationships across morphologically disparate cave and spring forms suggests that cave invasion was recent and many troglobitic morphologies arose independently. These patterns are consistent with an adaptive-shift hypothesis of divergence, which has been proposed to explain diversification in other karst fauna. While cave and surface forms often do not appear to be genetically isolated, morphological diversity within and among populations may be maintained by developmental plasticity, selection, or a combination thereof. BioMed Central 2013-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3848792/ /pubmed/24044519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-201 Text en Copyright © 2013 Bendik et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bendik, Nathan F
Meik, Jesse M
Gluesenkamp, Andrew G
Roelke, Corey E
Chippindale, Paul T
Biogeography, phylogeny, and morphological evolution of central Texas cave and spring salamanders
title Biogeography, phylogeny, and morphological evolution of central Texas cave and spring salamanders
title_full Biogeography, phylogeny, and morphological evolution of central Texas cave and spring salamanders
title_fullStr Biogeography, phylogeny, and morphological evolution of central Texas cave and spring salamanders
title_full_unstemmed Biogeography, phylogeny, and morphological evolution of central Texas cave and spring salamanders
title_short Biogeography, phylogeny, and morphological evolution of central Texas cave and spring salamanders
title_sort biogeography, phylogeny, and morphological evolution of central texas cave and spring salamanders
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24044519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-201
work_keys_str_mv AT bendiknathanf biogeographyphylogenyandmorphologicalevolutionofcentraltexascaveandspringsalamanders
AT meikjessem biogeographyphylogenyandmorphologicalevolutionofcentraltexascaveandspringsalamanders
AT gluesenkampandrewg biogeographyphylogenyandmorphologicalevolutionofcentraltexascaveandspringsalamanders
AT roelkecoreye biogeographyphylogenyandmorphologicalevolutionofcentraltexascaveandspringsalamanders
AT chippindalepault biogeographyphylogenyandmorphologicalevolutionofcentraltexascaveandspringsalamanders