Cargando…

Mixed venous O(2) saturation and fluid responsiveness after cardiac or major vascular surgery

BACKGROUND: It is unclear if and how S(v)O(2) can serve as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in patients after cardiac or major vascular surgery. METHODS: This was a substudy of a randomized single-blinded clinical trial reported earlier on critically ill patients with clinical hypovolemia after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuiper, Arjan N, Trof, Ronald J, Groeneveld, AB Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24053433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-8-189
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: It is unclear if and how S(v)O(2) can serve as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in patients after cardiac or major vascular surgery. METHODS: This was a substudy of a randomized single-blinded clinical trial reported earlier on critically ill patients with clinical hypovolemia after cardiac or major vascular surgery. Colloid fluid loading was done for 90 min, guided by changes in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) or central venous pressure (CVP). Fluid responsiveness was defined as ≥15% increase in cardiac index (CI). Hemodynamics, including transpulmonary dilution-derived global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) and global ejection fraction (GEF), were measured and blood samples taken. RESULTS: Whereas baseline S(v)O(2) (>70% in 68% of patients) did not differ, the S(v)O(2) increased in patients responding to fluid loading (≥15% in CI in n = 26) versus those not responding (n = 11; P = 0.03). The increase in GEDVI was also greater in responders (P = 0.005). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for fluid responsiveness of changes in S(v)O(2) was 0.73 (P = 0.007), with an optimal cutoff of 2%, and of those in GEDVI 0.82 (P < 0.001), while the areas did not differ. However, the value of S(v)O(2) increases to reflect CI increases with fluid loading was greatest when GEF was ≤20% (in 53% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in S(v)O(2) ≥2%, irrespective of a relatively high baseline value, can thus be used as a monitor of fluid responsiveness in clinically hypovolemic patients after cardiac or major vascular surgery, particularly in those with systolic cardiac dysfunction. Fluid responsiveness concurs with increased tissue O(2) delivery.