Cargando…
Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies
OBJECTIVE: To examine the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) in insulin-resistant pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of 435 women with type 2 or gestational diabetes from 2006–2010. The exposure was categorized as GWG less than,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23949833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.100 |
_version_ | 1782293838852784128 |
---|---|
author | HARPER, Lorie M. SHANKS, Anthony L. ODIBO, Anthony O. COLVIN, Ryan MACONES, George A. CAHILL, Alison G. |
author_facet | HARPER, Lorie M. SHANKS, Anthony L. ODIBO, Anthony O. COLVIN, Ryan MACONES, George A. CAHILL, Alison G. |
author_sort | HARPER, Lorie M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) in insulin-resistant pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of 435 women with type 2 or gestational diabetes from 2006–2010. The exposure was categorized as GWG less than, within, or greater than the IOM recommendations for body mass index. The maternal outcome was a composite of preeclampsia, eclampsia, 3(rd)–4(th) degree laceration, readmission, or wound infection. The neonatal outcome was a composite of preterm delivery, level 3 nursery admission, oxygen requirement >6 hours, shoulder dystocia, 5-minute Apgar≤3, umbilical cord arterial pH<7.1, or base excess <−12. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery (CD), macrosomia, and small for gestational age (SGA). RESULTS: Incidence of the maternal outcome did not differ with GWG (p=0.15). Women gaining more than recommended had an increased risk of CD (relative risk (RR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.69) and the neonatal outcome (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01–1.95) compared to women gaining within the IOM recommendations. Women gaining less than recommended had an increased risk of SGA (RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.09–9.91) without a decrease in the risk of the maternal outcome (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.49–1.78) or CD (RR 0.74-0.40-1.37) compared to women gaining within the IOM recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Women with insulin resistance should be advised to gain within the current IOM guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3848869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38488692014-06-01 Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies HARPER, Lorie M. SHANKS, Anthony L. ODIBO, Anthony O. COLVIN, Ryan MACONES, George A. CAHILL, Alison G. J Perinatol Article OBJECTIVE: To examine the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) in insulin-resistant pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of 435 women with type 2 or gestational diabetes from 2006–2010. The exposure was categorized as GWG less than, within, or greater than the IOM recommendations for body mass index. The maternal outcome was a composite of preeclampsia, eclampsia, 3(rd)–4(th) degree laceration, readmission, or wound infection. The neonatal outcome was a composite of preterm delivery, level 3 nursery admission, oxygen requirement >6 hours, shoulder dystocia, 5-minute Apgar≤3, umbilical cord arterial pH<7.1, or base excess <−12. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery (CD), macrosomia, and small for gestational age (SGA). RESULTS: Incidence of the maternal outcome did not differ with GWG (p=0.15). Women gaining more than recommended had an increased risk of CD (relative risk (RR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.69) and the neonatal outcome (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01–1.95) compared to women gaining within the IOM recommendations. Women gaining less than recommended had an increased risk of SGA (RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.09–9.91) without a decrease in the risk of the maternal outcome (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.49–1.78) or CD (RR 0.74-0.40-1.37) compared to women gaining within the IOM recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Women with insulin resistance should be advised to gain within the current IOM guidelines. 2013-08-15 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3848869/ /pubmed/23949833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.100 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article HARPER, Lorie M. SHANKS, Anthony L. ODIBO, Anthony O. COLVIN, Ryan MACONES, George A. CAHILL, Alison G. Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies |
title | Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies |
title_full | Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies |
title_fullStr | Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies |
title_full_unstemmed | Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies |
title_short | Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies |
title_sort | gestational weight gain in insulin resistant pregnancies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23949833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harperloriem gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies AT shanksanthonyl gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies AT odiboanthonyo gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies AT colvinryan gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies AT maconesgeorgea gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies AT cahillalisong gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies |