Cargando…

Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies

OBJECTIVE: To examine the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) in insulin-resistant pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of 435 women with type 2 or gestational diabetes from 2006–2010. The exposure was categorized as GWG less than,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HARPER, Lorie M., SHANKS, Anthony L., ODIBO, Anthony O., COLVIN, Ryan, MACONES, George A., CAHILL, Alison G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23949833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.100
_version_ 1782293838852784128
author HARPER, Lorie M.
SHANKS, Anthony L.
ODIBO, Anthony O.
COLVIN, Ryan
MACONES, George A.
CAHILL, Alison G.
author_facet HARPER, Lorie M.
SHANKS, Anthony L.
ODIBO, Anthony O.
COLVIN, Ryan
MACONES, George A.
CAHILL, Alison G.
author_sort HARPER, Lorie M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) in insulin-resistant pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of 435 women with type 2 or gestational diabetes from 2006–2010. The exposure was categorized as GWG less than, within, or greater than the IOM recommendations for body mass index. The maternal outcome was a composite of preeclampsia, eclampsia, 3(rd)–4(th) degree laceration, readmission, or wound infection. The neonatal outcome was a composite of preterm delivery, level 3 nursery admission, oxygen requirement >6 hours, shoulder dystocia, 5-minute Apgar≤3, umbilical cord arterial pH<7.1, or base excess <−12. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery (CD), macrosomia, and small for gestational age (SGA). RESULTS: Incidence of the maternal outcome did not differ with GWG (p=0.15). Women gaining more than recommended had an increased risk of CD (relative risk (RR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.69) and the neonatal outcome (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01–1.95) compared to women gaining within the IOM recommendations. Women gaining less than recommended had an increased risk of SGA (RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.09–9.91) without a decrease in the risk of the maternal outcome (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.49–1.78) or CD (RR 0.74-0.40-1.37) compared to women gaining within the IOM recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Women with insulin resistance should be advised to gain within the current IOM guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3848869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38488692014-06-01 Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies HARPER, Lorie M. SHANKS, Anthony L. ODIBO, Anthony O. COLVIN, Ryan MACONES, George A. CAHILL, Alison G. J Perinatol Article OBJECTIVE: To examine the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) in insulin-resistant pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of 435 women with type 2 or gestational diabetes from 2006–2010. The exposure was categorized as GWG less than, within, or greater than the IOM recommendations for body mass index. The maternal outcome was a composite of preeclampsia, eclampsia, 3(rd)–4(th) degree laceration, readmission, or wound infection. The neonatal outcome was a composite of preterm delivery, level 3 nursery admission, oxygen requirement >6 hours, shoulder dystocia, 5-minute Apgar≤3, umbilical cord arterial pH<7.1, or base excess <−12. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery (CD), macrosomia, and small for gestational age (SGA). RESULTS: Incidence of the maternal outcome did not differ with GWG (p=0.15). Women gaining more than recommended had an increased risk of CD (relative risk (RR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.69) and the neonatal outcome (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01–1.95) compared to women gaining within the IOM recommendations. Women gaining less than recommended had an increased risk of SGA (RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.09–9.91) without a decrease in the risk of the maternal outcome (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.49–1.78) or CD (RR 0.74-0.40-1.37) compared to women gaining within the IOM recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Women with insulin resistance should be advised to gain within the current IOM guidelines. 2013-08-15 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3848869/ /pubmed/23949833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.100 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
HARPER, Lorie M.
SHANKS, Anthony L.
ODIBO, Anthony O.
COLVIN, Ryan
MACONES, George A.
CAHILL, Alison G.
Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies
title Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies
title_full Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies
title_fullStr Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies
title_full_unstemmed Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies
title_short Gestational Weight Gain in Insulin Resistant Pregnancies
title_sort gestational weight gain in insulin resistant pregnancies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23949833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.100
work_keys_str_mv AT harperloriem gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies
AT shanksanthonyl gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies
AT odiboanthonyo gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies
AT colvinryan gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies
AT maconesgeorgea gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies
AT cahillalisong gestationalweightgainininsulinresistantpregnancies