Cargando…
The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for gout. The aim of the study was to determine whether a footwear intervention can reduce foot pain and musculoskeletal disability in people with gout. METHODS: Thirty-six people with gout participated in a prospective inter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24063678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-278 |
_version_ | 1782293850604175360 |
---|---|
author | Rome, Keith Stewart, Sarah Vandal, Alain C Gow, Peter McNair, Peter Dalbeth, Nicola |
author_facet | Rome, Keith Stewart, Sarah Vandal, Alain C Gow, Peter McNair, Peter Dalbeth, Nicola |
author_sort | Rome, Keith |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for gout. The aim of the study was to determine whether a footwear intervention can reduce foot pain and musculoskeletal disability in people with gout. METHODS: Thirty-six people with gout participated in a prospective intervention study over 8 weeks. Participants selected one of 4 pairs of shoes and thereafter wore the shoes for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was foot pain using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes related to function and disability were also analysed. RESULTS: The Cardio Zip shoe was selected by 58% of participants. Compared with baseline, overall scores for all shoes at 8-weeks demonstrated a decrease in foot pain (p = 0.03), general pain (p = 0.012), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)-II (p = 0.016) and Leeds Foot Impact Scale (LFIS) impairment subscale (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in other patient reported outcomes including patient global assessment, LFIS activity subscale, and Lower Limb Task Questionnaire subscales (all p > 0.10). We observed significant improvements between baseline measurements using the participants’ own shoes and the Cardio Zip for foot pain (p = 0.002), general pain (p = 0.001), HAQ-II (p = 0.002) and LFIS impairment subscale (p = 0.004) after 8 weeks. The other three shoes did not improve pain or disability. CONCLUSIONS: Footwear with good cushioning, and motion control may reduce foot pain and disability in people with gout. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3848939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38489392013-12-04 The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study Rome, Keith Stewart, Sarah Vandal, Alain C Gow, Peter McNair, Peter Dalbeth, Nicola BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for gout. The aim of the study was to determine whether a footwear intervention can reduce foot pain and musculoskeletal disability in people with gout. METHODS: Thirty-six people with gout participated in a prospective intervention study over 8 weeks. Participants selected one of 4 pairs of shoes and thereafter wore the shoes for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was foot pain using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes related to function and disability were also analysed. RESULTS: The Cardio Zip shoe was selected by 58% of participants. Compared with baseline, overall scores for all shoes at 8-weeks demonstrated a decrease in foot pain (p = 0.03), general pain (p = 0.012), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)-II (p = 0.016) and Leeds Foot Impact Scale (LFIS) impairment subscale (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in other patient reported outcomes including patient global assessment, LFIS activity subscale, and Lower Limb Task Questionnaire subscales (all p > 0.10). We observed significant improvements between baseline measurements using the participants’ own shoes and the Cardio Zip for foot pain (p = 0.002), general pain (p = 0.001), HAQ-II (p = 0.002) and LFIS impairment subscale (p = 0.004) after 8 weeks. The other three shoes did not improve pain or disability. CONCLUSIONS: Footwear with good cushioning, and motion control may reduce foot pain and disability in people with gout. BioMed Central 2013-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3848939/ /pubmed/24063678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-278 Text en Copyright © 2013 Rome et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rome, Keith Stewart, Sarah Vandal, Alain C Gow, Peter McNair, Peter Dalbeth, Nicola The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study |
title | The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study |
title_full | The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study |
title_short | The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study |
title_sort | effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24063678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romekeith theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT stewartsarah theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT vandalalainc theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT gowpeter theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT mcnairpeter theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT dalbethnicola theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT romekeith effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT stewartsarah effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT vandalalainc effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT gowpeter effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT mcnairpeter effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy AT dalbethnicola effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy |