Cargando…

The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for gout. The aim of the study was to determine whether a footwear intervention can reduce foot pain and musculoskeletal disability in people with gout. METHODS: Thirty-six people with gout participated in a prospective inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rome, Keith, Stewart, Sarah, Vandal, Alain C, Gow, Peter, McNair, Peter, Dalbeth, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24063678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-278
_version_ 1782293850604175360
author Rome, Keith
Stewart, Sarah
Vandal, Alain C
Gow, Peter
McNair, Peter
Dalbeth, Nicola
author_facet Rome, Keith
Stewart, Sarah
Vandal, Alain C
Gow, Peter
McNair, Peter
Dalbeth, Nicola
author_sort Rome, Keith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for gout. The aim of the study was to determine whether a footwear intervention can reduce foot pain and musculoskeletal disability in people with gout. METHODS: Thirty-six people with gout participated in a prospective intervention study over 8 weeks. Participants selected one of 4 pairs of shoes and thereafter wore the shoes for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was foot pain using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes related to function and disability were also analysed. RESULTS: The Cardio Zip shoe was selected by 58% of participants. Compared with baseline, overall scores for all shoes at 8-weeks demonstrated a decrease in foot pain (p = 0.03), general pain (p = 0.012), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)-II (p = 0.016) and Leeds Foot Impact Scale (LFIS) impairment subscale (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in other patient reported outcomes including patient global assessment, LFIS activity subscale, and Lower Limb Task Questionnaire subscales (all p > 0.10). We observed significant improvements between baseline measurements using the participants’ own shoes and the Cardio Zip for foot pain (p = 0.002), general pain (p = 0.001), HAQ-II (p = 0.002) and LFIS impairment subscale (p = 0.004) after 8 weeks. The other three shoes did not improve pain or disability. CONCLUSIONS: Footwear with good cushioning, and motion control may reduce foot pain and disability in people with gout.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3848939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38489392013-12-04 The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study Rome, Keith Stewart, Sarah Vandal, Alain C Gow, Peter McNair, Peter Dalbeth, Nicola BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for gout. The aim of the study was to determine whether a footwear intervention can reduce foot pain and musculoskeletal disability in people with gout. METHODS: Thirty-six people with gout participated in a prospective intervention study over 8 weeks. Participants selected one of 4 pairs of shoes and thereafter wore the shoes for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was foot pain using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes related to function and disability were also analysed. RESULTS: The Cardio Zip shoe was selected by 58% of participants. Compared with baseline, overall scores for all shoes at 8-weeks demonstrated a decrease in foot pain (p = 0.03), general pain (p = 0.012), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)-II (p = 0.016) and Leeds Foot Impact Scale (LFIS) impairment subscale (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in other patient reported outcomes including patient global assessment, LFIS activity subscale, and Lower Limb Task Questionnaire subscales (all p > 0.10). We observed significant improvements between baseline measurements using the participants’ own shoes and the Cardio Zip for foot pain (p = 0.002), general pain (p = 0.001), HAQ-II (p = 0.002) and LFIS impairment subscale (p = 0.004) after 8 weeks. The other three shoes did not improve pain or disability. CONCLUSIONS: Footwear with good cushioning, and motion control may reduce foot pain and disability in people with gout. BioMed Central 2013-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3848939/ /pubmed/24063678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-278 Text en Copyright © 2013 Rome et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rome, Keith
Stewart, Sarah
Vandal, Alain C
Gow, Peter
McNair, Peter
Dalbeth, Nicola
The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study
title The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study
title_full The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study
title_fullStr The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study
title_short The effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study
title_sort effects of commercially available footwear on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24063678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-278
work_keys_str_mv AT romekeith theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT stewartsarah theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT vandalalainc theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT gowpeter theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT mcnairpeter theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT dalbethnicola theeffectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT romekeith effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT stewartsarah effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT vandalalainc effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT gowpeter effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT mcnairpeter effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy
AT dalbethnicola effectsofcommerciallyavailablefootwearonfootpainanddisabilityinpeoplewithgoutapilotstudy