Cargando…

Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality

BACKGROUND: There is a need to have uniformed reporting of perinatal mortality for births following assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment to enable international comparison and benchmarking of ART practice. METHODS: The Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database was used in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sullivan, Elizabeth A, Wang, Yueping A, Norman, Robert J, Chambers, Georgina M, Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad, Farquhar, Cynthia M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24044524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-177
_version_ 1782293850842202112
author Sullivan, Elizabeth A
Wang, Yueping A
Norman, Robert J
Chambers, Georgina M
Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad
Farquhar, Cynthia M
author_facet Sullivan, Elizabeth A
Wang, Yueping A
Norman, Robert J
Chambers, Georgina M
Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad
Farquhar, Cynthia M
author_sort Sullivan, Elizabeth A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need to have uniformed reporting of perinatal mortality for births following assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment to enable international comparison and benchmarking of ART practice. METHODS: The Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database was used in this study. Births of ≥ 20 weeks gestation and/or ≥ 400 grams of birth weight following embryos transfer cycles in Australia and New Zealand during the period 2004 to 2008 were included. Differences in the mortality rates by different perinatal periods from a gestational age cutoff of ≥ 20, ≥ 22, ≥ 24, or ≥ 28 weeks (wks) to a neonatal period cutoff of either < 7 or < 28 days after birth were assessed. Crude and specific (number of embryos transferred and plurality) rates of perinatal mortality were calculated for selected gestational and neonatal periods. RESULTS: When the perinatal period is defined as ≥ 20 wks gestation to < 28 days after birth, the perinatal mortality rate (PMR) was 16.1 per 1000 births (n = 630). A progressive contraction of the gestational age groups resulted in marked reductions in the PMR for deaths at < 28 days (22 wks 11.0; 24 wks 7.7; 28 wks 5.6); and similarly for deaths at < 7 days (20 wks 15.6, 22 wks 10.5; 24 wks 7.3; 28 wks 5.3). In contrast, a contraction of the perinatal period from < 28 to < 7 days after birth only marginally reduced the PMR from 16.2 to 15.6 per 1000 births which was consistent across all gestational ages. The PMR for single embryo transfer (SET) births (≥ 20 weeks gestation to < 7 days post-birth) was significantly lower (12.8 per 1000 SET births) compared to double embryo transfer (DET) births (PMR 18.3 per 1000 DET births; p < 0.001, Fisher’s Exact Test). Similarly, the PMR for SET births (≥ 22 weeks gestation to < 7 days post-birth) was significantly lower (8.8 per 1000 SET births, p < 0.001, Fisher’s Exact Test) when compared to DET births (12.2 per 1000 DET births). The highest PMR (50.5 per 1000 SET births, 95% CI 36.5-64.5) was for twins following SET births (≥ 20 weeks gestation to < 7 days post-birth) compared to twins following DET (23.9 per 1000 DET births, 95% CI 20.8-27.1). CONCLUSION: Reporting of perinatal mortality of ART births is an essential component of quality ART practice. This should include measures that monitor the impact on perinatal mortality of multiple embryo transfer. We recommend that reporting of perinatal deaths following ART treatment, should be stratified for three gestation-specific perinatal periods of ≥ 20, ≥ 22 and ≥ 28 completed weeks to < 7 days post-birth; and include plurality specific rates by SET and DET. This would provide a valuable international evidence-base of PMR for use in evaluating ART policy, practice and new research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3848940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38489402013-12-04 Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality Sullivan, Elizabeth A Wang, Yueping A Norman, Robert J Chambers, Georgina M Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad Farquhar, Cynthia M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a need to have uniformed reporting of perinatal mortality for births following assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment to enable international comparison and benchmarking of ART practice. METHODS: The Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database was used in this study. Births of ≥ 20 weeks gestation and/or ≥ 400 grams of birth weight following embryos transfer cycles in Australia and New Zealand during the period 2004 to 2008 were included. Differences in the mortality rates by different perinatal periods from a gestational age cutoff of ≥ 20, ≥ 22, ≥ 24, or ≥ 28 weeks (wks) to a neonatal period cutoff of either < 7 or < 28 days after birth were assessed. Crude and specific (number of embryos transferred and plurality) rates of perinatal mortality were calculated for selected gestational and neonatal periods. RESULTS: When the perinatal period is defined as ≥ 20 wks gestation to < 28 days after birth, the perinatal mortality rate (PMR) was 16.1 per 1000 births (n = 630). A progressive contraction of the gestational age groups resulted in marked reductions in the PMR for deaths at < 28 days (22 wks 11.0; 24 wks 7.7; 28 wks 5.6); and similarly for deaths at < 7 days (20 wks 15.6, 22 wks 10.5; 24 wks 7.3; 28 wks 5.3). In contrast, a contraction of the perinatal period from < 28 to < 7 days after birth only marginally reduced the PMR from 16.2 to 15.6 per 1000 births which was consistent across all gestational ages. The PMR for single embryo transfer (SET) births (≥ 20 weeks gestation to < 7 days post-birth) was significantly lower (12.8 per 1000 SET births) compared to double embryo transfer (DET) births (PMR 18.3 per 1000 DET births; p < 0.001, Fisher’s Exact Test). Similarly, the PMR for SET births (≥ 22 weeks gestation to < 7 days post-birth) was significantly lower (8.8 per 1000 SET births, p < 0.001, Fisher’s Exact Test) when compared to DET births (12.2 per 1000 DET births). The highest PMR (50.5 per 1000 SET births, 95% CI 36.5-64.5) was for twins following SET births (≥ 20 weeks gestation to < 7 days post-birth) compared to twins following DET (23.9 per 1000 DET births, 95% CI 20.8-27.1). CONCLUSION: Reporting of perinatal mortality of ART births is an essential component of quality ART practice. This should include measures that monitor the impact on perinatal mortality of multiple embryo transfer. We recommend that reporting of perinatal deaths following ART treatment, should be stratified for three gestation-specific perinatal periods of ≥ 20, ≥ 22 and ≥ 28 completed weeks to < 7 days post-birth; and include plurality specific rates by SET and DET. This would provide a valuable international evidence-base of PMR for use in evaluating ART policy, practice and new research. BioMed Central 2013-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3848940/ /pubmed/24044524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-177 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sullivan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sullivan, Elizabeth A
Wang, Yueping A
Norman, Robert J
Chambers, Georgina M
Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad
Farquhar, Cynthia M
Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality
title Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality
title_full Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality
title_fullStr Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality
title_full_unstemmed Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality
title_short Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality
title_sort perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in australia and new zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24044524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-177
work_keys_str_mv AT sullivanelizabetha perinatalmortalityfollowingassistedreproductivetechnologytreatmentinaustraliaandnewzealandapublichealthapproachforinternationalreportingofperinatalmortality
AT wangyuepinga perinatalmortalityfollowingassistedreproductivetechnologytreatmentinaustraliaandnewzealandapublichealthapproachforinternationalreportingofperinatalmortality
AT normanrobertj perinatalmortalityfollowingassistedreproductivetechnologytreatmentinaustraliaandnewzealandapublichealthapproachforinternationalreportingofperinatalmortality
AT chambersgeorginam perinatalmortalityfollowingassistedreproductivetechnologytreatmentinaustraliaandnewzealandapublichealthapproachforinternationalreportingofperinatalmortality
AT chughtaiabrarahmad perinatalmortalityfollowingassistedreproductivetechnologytreatmentinaustraliaandnewzealandapublichealthapproachforinternationalreportingofperinatalmortality
AT farquharcynthiam perinatalmortalityfollowingassistedreproductivetechnologytreatmentinaustraliaandnewzealandapublichealthapproachforinternationalreportingofperinatalmortality