Cargando…

Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?

BACKGROUND: Is existing provision of health services in Europe affordable during the recession or could cuts damage economic growth? This debate centres on whether government spending has positive or negative effects on economic growth. In this study, we evaluate the economic effects of alternative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reeves, Aaron, Basu, Sanjay, McKee, Martin, Meissner, Christopher, Stuckler, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24059873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-43
_version_ 1782293879456792576
author Reeves, Aaron
Basu, Sanjay
McKee, Martin
Meissner, Christopher
Stuckler, David
author_facet Reeves, Aaron
Basu, Sanjay
McKee, Martin
Meissner, Christopher
Stuckler, David
author_sort Reeves, Aaron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Is existing provision of health services in Europe affordable during the recession or could cuts damage economic growth? This debate centres on whether government spending has positive or negative effects on economic growth. In this study, we evaluate the economic effects of alternative types of government spending by estimating “fiscal multipliers” (the return on investment for each $1 dollar of government spending). METHODS: Using cross-national fixed effects models covering 25 EU countries from 1995 to 2010, we quantified fiscal multipliers both before and during the recession that began in 2008. RESULTS: We found that the multiplier for total government spending was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.37 to 1.86), but there was marked heterogeneity across types of spending. The fiscal multipliers ranged from −9.8 for defence (95% CI: -16.7 to −3.0) to 4.3 for health (95% CI: 2.5 to 6.1). These differences appear to be explained by varying degrees of absorption of government spending into the domestic economy. Defence was linked to significantly greater trade deficits (β = −7.58, p=0.017), whereas health and education had no effect on trade deficits (p(education)=0.62; p(health)= 0.33). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that government spending on health may have short-term effects that make recovery more likely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3849102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38491022013-12-07 Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth? Reeves, Aaron Basu, Sanjay McKee, Martin Meissner, Christopher Stuckler, David Global Health Research BACKGROUND: Is existing provision of health services in Europe affordable during the recession or could cuts damage economic growth? This debate centres on whether government spending has positive or negative effects on economic growth. In this study, we evaluate the economic effects of alternative types of government spending by estimating “fiscal multipliers” (the return on investment for each $1 dollar of government spending). METHODS: Using cross-national fixed effects models covering 25 EU countries from 1995 to 2010, we quantified fiscal multipliers both before and during the recession that began in 2008. RESULTS: We found that the multiplier for total government spending was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.37 to 1.86), but there was marked heterogeneity across types of spending. The fiscal multipliers ranged from −9.8 for defence (95% CI: -16.7 to −3.0) to 4.3 for health (95% CI: 2.5 to 6.1). These differences appear to be explained by varying degrees of absorption of government spending into the domestic economy. Defence was linked to significantly greater trade deficits (β = −7.58, p=0.017), whereas health and education had no effect on trade deficits (p(education)=0.62; p(health)= 0.33). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that government spending on health may have short-term effects that make recovery more likely. BioMed Central 2013-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3849102/ /pubmed/24059873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-43 Text en Copyright © 2013 Reeves et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Reeves, Aaron
Basu, Sanjay
McKee, Martin
Meissner, Christopher
Stuckler, David
Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?
title Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?
title_full Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?
title_fullStr Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?
title_full_unstemmed Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?
title_short Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?
title_sort does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24059873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-43
work_keys_str_mv AT reevesaaron doesinvestmentinthehealthsectorpromoteorinhibiteconomicgrowth
AT basusanjay doesinvestmentinthehealthsectorpromoteorinhibiteconomicgrowth
AT mckeemartin doesinvestmentinthehealthsectorpromoteorinhibiteconomicgrowth
AT meissnerchristopher doesinvestmentinthehealthsectorpromoteorinhibiteconomicgrowth
AT stucklerdavid doesinvestmentinthehealthsectorpromoteorinhibiteconomicgrowth