Cargando…
Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth?
BACKGROUND: Is existing provision of health services in Europe affordable during the recession or could cuts damage economic growth? This debate centres on whether government spending has positive or negative effects on economic growth. In this study, we evaluate the economic effects of alternative...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24059873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-43 |
_version_ | 1782293879456792576 |
---|---|
author | Reeves, Aaron Basu, Sanjay McKee, Martin Meissner, Christopher Stuckler, David |
author_facet | Reeves, Aaron Basu, Sanjay McKee, Martin Meissner, Christopher Stuckler, David |
author_sort | Reeves, Aaron |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Is existing provision of health services in Europe affordable during the recession or could cuts damage economic growth? This debate centres on whether government spending has positive or negative effects on economic growth. In this study, we evaluate the economic effects of alternative types of government spending by estimating “fiscal multipliers” (the return on investment for each $1 dollar of government spending). METHODS: Using cross-national fixed effects models covering 25 EU countries from 1995 to 2010, we quantified fiscal multipliers both before and during the recession that began in 2008. RESULTS: We found that the multiplier for total government spending was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.37 to 1.86), but there was marked heterogeneity across types of spending. The fiscal multipliers ranged from −9.8 for defence (95% CI: -16.7 to −3.0) to 4.3 for health (95% CI: 2.5 to 6.1). These differences appear to be explained by varying degrees of absorption of government spending into the domestic economy. Defence was linked to significantly greater trade deficits (β = −7.58, p=0.017), whereas health and education had no effect on trade deficits (p(education)=0.62; p(health)= 0.33). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that government spending on health may have short-term effects that make recovery more likely. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3849102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38491022013-12-07 Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth? Reeves, Aaron Basu, Sanjay McKee, Martin Meissner, Christopher Stuckler, David Global Health Research BACKGROUND: Is existing provision of health services in Europe affordable during the recession or could cuts damage economic growth? This debate centres on whether government spending has positive or negative effects on economic growth. In this study, we evaluate the economic effects of alternative types of government spending by estimating “fiscal multipliers” (the return on investment for each $1 dollar of government spending). METHODS: Using cross-national fixed effects models covering 25 EU countries from 1995 to 2010, we quantified fiscal multipliers both before and during the recession that began in 2008. RESULTS: We found that the multiplier for total government spending was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.37 to 1.86), but there was marked heterogeneity across types of spending. The fiscal multipliers ranged from −9.8 for defence (95% CI: -16.7 to −3.0) to 4.3 for health (95% CI: 2.5 to 6.1). These differences appear to be explained by varying degrees of absorption of government spending into the domestic economy. Defence was linked to significantly greater trade deficits (β = −7.58, p=0.017), whereas health and education had no effect on trade deficits (p(education)=0.62; p(health)= 0.33). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that government spending on health may have short-term effects that make recovery more likely. BioMed Central 2013-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3849102/ /pubmed/24059873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-43 Text en Copyright © 2013 Reeves et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Reeves, Aaron Basu, Sanjay McKee, Martin Meissner, Christopher Stuckler, David Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth? |
title | Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth? |
title_full | Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth? |
title_fullStr | Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth? |
title_short | Does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth? |
title_sort | does investment in the health sector promote or inhibit economic growth? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24059873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-43 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reevesaaron doesinvestmentinthehealthsectorpromoteorinhibiteconomicgrowth AT basusanjay doesinvestmentinthehealthsectorpromoteorinhibiteconomicgrowth AT mckeemartin doesinvestmentinthehealthsectorpromoteorinhibiteconomicgrowth AT meissnerchristopher doesinvestmentinthehealthsectorpromoteorinhibiteconomicgrowth AT stucklerdavid doesinvestmentinthehealthsectorpromoteorinhibiteconomicgrowth |