Cargando…

A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning

RATIONALE: The validated 19-item Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) is often used for assessing attitudes toward interprofessional education (IPE). The 12-item Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS), also used for this purpose, has not been validated among the profes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lie, Désirée Annabel, Fung, Cha Chi, Trial, Janet, Lohenry, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24300749
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.21885
_version_ 1782293939288539136
author Lie, Désirée Annabel
Fung, Cha Chi
Trial, Janet
Lohenry, Kevin
author_facet Lie, Désirée Annabel
Fung, Cha Chi
Trial, Janet
Lohenry, Kevin
author_sort Lie, Désirée Annabel
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: The validated 19-item Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) is often used for assessing attitudes toward interprofessional education (IPE). The 12-item Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS), also used for this purpose, has not been validated among the professions of medicine, pharmacy, and physician assistants (PAs). The discriminatory ability of the two scales has not been directly compared. Comparison of the two will aid educators in selecting the optimal scale. OBJECTIVE: To compare psychometric properties of the RIPLS and IEPS and to examine the ability of each scale to discriminate mean scores among student subgroups (gender, profession, seniority, and prior IPE exposure). METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional (Qualtrics(©)) survey (RIPLS and IEPS) of junior and senior students in medicine (n=360), pharmacy (n=360), and the PA profession (n=106). Descriptive statistics were used to report aggregate mean scores of subgroups. The internal consistency of each scale was assessed using Cronbach's α. Concurrent validity was measured by Pearson's correlation coefficients. Independent-sample t-tests and analysis of variances (ANOVAs) were performed to assess the discriminatory ability of each scale. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for all significant pair-wise comparisons. RESULTS: Response rate was 82%. Cronbach's α was 0.85 (RIPLS) and 0.91 (IEPS). The RIPLS discriminated scores by gender among junior students only, and scores by IPE exposure among all students. The IEPS distinguished score differences for the three professions among junior students and by prior IPE exposure for all three professions. Neither scale detected differences in mean scores by profession among all students or by level of training among the three professions. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the RIPLS nor the IEPS has greater discriminatory ability for detecting attitude differences among the student subgroups. Reason for differences may be explained by slightly different scale constructs. The RIPLS is designed to assess students’ own attitude toward interprofessional learning, while the IEPS discerns perceived attitudes about team collaboration for students’ own professions and may be more appropriate for more advanced students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3849511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38495112013-12-06 A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning Lie, Désirée Annabel Fung, Cha Chi Trial, Janet Lohenry, Kevin Med Educ Online Research Article RATIONALE: The validated 19-item Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) is often used for assessing attitudes toward interprofessional education (IPE). The 12-item Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS), also used for this purpose, has not been validated among the professions of medicine, pharmacy, and physician assistants (PAs). The discriminatory ability of the two scales has not been directly compared. Comparison of the two will aid educators in selecting the optimal scale. OBJECTIVE: To compare psychometric properties of the RIPLS and IEPS and to examine the ability of each scale to discriminate mean scores among student subgroups (gender, profession, seniority, and prior IPE exposure). METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional (Qualtrics(©)) survey (RIPLS and IEPS) of junior and senior students in medicine (n=360), pharmacy (n=360), and the PA profession (n=106). Descriptive statistics were used to report aggregate mean scores of subgroups. The internal consistency of each scale was assessed using Cronbach's α. Concurrent validity was measured by Pearson's correlation coefficients. Independent-sample t-tests and analysis of variances (ANOVAs) were performed to assess the discriminatory ability of each scale. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for all significant pair-wise comparisons. RESULTS: Response rate was 82%. Cronbach's α was 0.85 (RIPLS) and 0.91 (IEPS). The RIPLS discriminated scores by gender among junior students only, and scores by IPE exposure among all students. The IEPS distinguished score differences for the three professions among junior students and by prior IPE exposure for all three professions. Neither scale detected differences in mean scores by profession among all students or by level of training among the three professions. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the RIPLS nor the IEPS has greater discriminatory ability for detecting attitude differences among the student subgroups. Reason for differences may be explained by slightly different scale constructs. The RIPLS is designed to assess students’ own attitude toward interprofessional learning, while the IEPS discerns perceived attitudes about team collaboration for students’ own professions and may be more appropriate for more advanced students. Co-Action Publishing 2013-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3849511/ /pubmed/24300749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.21885 Text en © 2013 Désirée Annabel Lie et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lie, Désirée Annabel
Fung, Cha Chi
Trial, Janet
Lohenry, Kevin
A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning
title A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning
title_full A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning
title_fullStr A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning
title_short A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning
title_sort comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24300749
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.21885
work_keys_str_mv AT liedesireeannabel acomparisonoftwoscalesforassessinghealthprofessionalstudentsattitudetowardinterprofessionallearning
AT fungchachi acomparisonoftwoscalesforassessinghealthprofessionalstudentsattitudetowardinterprofessionallearning
AT trialjanet acomparisonoftwoscalesforassessinghealthprofessionalstudentsattitudetowardinterprofessionallearning
AT lohenrykevin acomparisonoftwoscalesforassessinghealthprofessionalstudentsattitudetowardinterprofessionallearning
AT liedesireeannabel comparisonoftwoscalesforassessinghealthprofessionalstudentsattitudetowardinterprofessionallearning
AT fungchachi comparisonoftwoscalesforassessinghealthprofessionalstudentsattitudetowardinterprofessionallearning
AT trialjanet comparisonoftwoscalesforassessinghealthprofessionalstudentsattitudetowardinterprofessionallearning
AT lohenrykevin comparisonoftwoscalesforassessinghealthprofessionalstudentsattitudetowardinterprofessionallearning