Cargando…

Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews

Cochrane Reviews are intended to help providers, practitioners and patients make informed decisions about health care. The goal of the Cochrane Applicability and Recommendation Methods Group (ARMG) is to develop approaches, strategies and guidance that facilitate the uptake of information from Cochr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langendam, Miranda W, Akl, Elie A, Dahm, Philipp, Glasziou, Paul, Guyatt, Gordon, Schünemann, Holger J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24059250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-81
_version_ 1782293999899377664
author Langendam, Miranda W
Akl, Elie A
Dahm, Philipp
Glasziou, Paul
Guyatt, Gordon
Schünemann, Holger J
author_facet Langendam, Miranda W
Akl, Elie A
Dahm, Philipp
Glasziou, Paul
Guyatt, Gordon
Schünemann, Holger J
author_sort Langendam, Miranda W
collection PubMed
description Cochrane Reviews are intended to help providers, practitioners and patients make informed decisions about health care. The goal of the Cochrane Applicability and Recommendation Methods Group (ARMG) is to develop approaches, strategies and guidance that facilitate the uptake of information from Cochrane Reviews and their use by a wide audience with specific focus on developers of recommendations and on healthcare decision makers. This paper is part of a series highlighting developments in systematic review methodology in the 20 years since the establishment of The Cochrane Collaboration, and its aim is to present current work and highlight future developments in assessing and presenting summaries of evidence, with special focus on Summary of Findings (SoF) tables and Plain Language Summaries. A SoF table provides a concise and transparent summary of the key findings of a review in a tabular format. Several studies have shown that SoF tables improve accessibility and understanding of Cochrane Reviews. The ARMG and GRADE Working Group are working on further development of the SoF tables, for example by evaluating the degree of acceptable flexibility beyond standard presentation of SoF tables, developing SoF tables for diagnostic test accuracy reviews and interactive SoF tables (iSoF). The plain language summary (PLS) is the other main building block for dissemination of review results to end-users. The PLS aims to summarize the results of a review in such a way that health care consumers can readily understand them. Current efforts include the development of a standardized language to describe statistical results, based on effect size and quality of supporting evidence. Producing high quality PLS and SoF tables and making them compatible and linked would make it easier to produce dissemination products targeting different audiences (for example, providers, health policy makers, guideline developers). Current issues of debate include optimal presentation formats of SoF tables, the training required to produce SoF tables, and the extent to which the authors of Cochrane Reviews should provide explicit guidance to target audiences of patients, clinicians and policy-makers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3849859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38498592013-12-05 Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews Langendam, Miranda W Akl, Elie A Dahm, Philipp Glasziou, Paul Guyatt, Gordon Schünemann, Holger J Syst Rev Commentary Cochrane Reviews are intended to help providers, practitioners and patients make informed decisions about health care. The goal of the Cochrane Applicability and Recommendation Methods Group (ARMG) is to develop approaches, strategies and guidance that facilitate the uptake of information from Cochrane Reviews and their use by a wide audience with specific focus on developers of recommendations and on healthcare decision makers. This paper is part of a series highlighting developments in systematic review methodology in the 20 years since the establishment of The Cochrane Collaboration, and its aim is to present current work and highlight future developments in assessing and presenting summaries of evidence, with special focus on Summary of Findings (SoF) tables and Plain Language Summaries. A SoF table provides a concise and transparent summary of the key findings of a review in a tabular format. Several studies have shown that SoF tables improve accessibility and understanding of Cochrane Reviews. The ARMG and GRADE Working Group are working on further development of the SoF tables, for example by evaluating the degree of acceptable flexibility beyond standard presentation of SoF tables, developing SoF tables for diagnostic test accuracy reviews and interactive SoF tables (iSoF). The plain language summary (PLS) is the other main building block for dissemination of review results to end-users. The PLS aims to summarize the results of a review in such a way that health care consumers can readily understand them. Current efforts include the development of a standardized language to describe statistical results, based on effect size and quality of supporting evidence. Producing high quality PLS and SoF tables and making them compatible and linked would make it easier to produce dissemination products targeting different audiences (for example, providers, health policy makers, guideline developers). Current issues of debate include optimal presentation formats of SoF tables, the training required to produce SoF tables, and the extent to which the authors of Cochrane Reviews should provide explicit guidance to target audiences of patients, clinicians and policy-makers. BioMed Central 2013-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3849859/ /pubmed/24059250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-81 Text en Copyright © 2013 Langendam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Langendam, Miranda W
Akl, Elie A
Dahm, Philipp
Glasziou, Paul
Guyatt, Gordon
Schünemann, Holger J
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
title Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
title_full Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
title_fullStr Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
title_short Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
title_sort assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in cochrane reviews
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24059250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-81
work_keys_str_mv AT langendammirandaw assessingandpresentingsummariesofevidenceincochranereviews
AT akleliea assessingandpresentingsummariesofevidenceincochranereviews
AT dahmphilipp assessingandpresentingsummariesofevidenceincochranereviews
AT glaszioupaul assessingandpresentingsummariesofevidenceincochranereviews
AT guyattgordon assessingandpresentingsummariesofevidenceincochranereviews
AT schunemannholgerj assessingandpresentingsummariesofevidenceincochranereviews