Cargando…
Survey of patients' view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists
BACKGROUND: The functional split model of consultant psychiatrist care for inpatients has been one of the major service redesign that has occurred in the NHS in the last decade. It is unclear if this new split model offers any advantages over the previous sectorised model of working. More recent evi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24074270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-362 |
_version_ | 1782294003284180992 |
---|---|
author | Begum, Millia Brown, Keith Pelosi, Anthony Crabb, Jim McTaggart, John Mitchell, Caroline Julyan, Everett Donegan, Tony Gotz, Michael |
author_facet | Begum, Millia Brown, Keith Pelosi, Anthony Crabb, Jim McTaggart, John Mitchell, Caroline Julyan, Everett Donegan, Tony Gotz, Michael |
author_sort | Begum, Millia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The functional split model of consultant psychiatrist care for inpatients has been one of the major service redesign that has occurred in the NHS in the last decade. It is unclear if this new split model offers any advantages over the previous sectorised model of working. More recent evidence has suggested that patients, carers and professionals have varied views regarding the benefits of this model. This survey of patient’s views on models of consultant working is the first in Scotland and we have attempted to include a large sample size. The results suggest that after providing sufficient information on both models, the majority of patients from various Scottish health boards have opted for the traditional sectorised model of working. METHOD: During a four week period consecutive patients across 4 health boards attending the General Adult consultant outpatient clinics and those who were admitted to their inpatient ward were offered a structured questionnaire regarding their views on the functional split versus traditional sectorised model. Space was provided for additional comments. The study used descriptive statistical measures for analysis of its results. Ethical approval was confirmed as not being required for this survey of local services. RESULTS: We had a response rate of 67%. A significant majority (76%) of service users across the four different health boards indicated a preference for the same consultant to manage their care irrespective of whether they were an inpatient or in the community (Chi-squared = 65, df = 1, p < 0.0001). In their unstructured comments patients often mentioned the value of the therapeutic relationship and trust in a single consultant psychiatrist. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey suggests that most patients prefer the traditional model where they see a single consultant throughout their journey of care. The views of patients should be sought as much as possible and should be taken into account when considering the best way to organize psychiatric services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3849881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38498812013-12-05 Survey of patients' view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists Begum, Millia Brown, Keith Pelosi, Anthony Crabb, Jim McTaggart, John Mitchell, Caroline Julyan, Everett Donegan, Tony Gotz, Michael BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The functional split model of consultant psychiatrist care for inpatients has been one of the major service redesign that has occurred in the NHS in the last decade. It is unclear if this new split model offers any advantages over the previous sectorised model of working. More recent evidence has suggested that patients, carers and professionals have varied views regarding the benefits of this model. This survey of patient’s views on models of consultant working is the first in Scotland and we have attempted to include a large sample size. The results suggest that after providing sufficient information on both models, the majority of patients from various Scottish health boards have opted for the traditional sectorised model of working. METHOD: During a four week period consecutive patients across 4 health boards attending the General Adult consultant outpatient clinics and those who were admitted to their inpatient ward were offered a structured questionnaire regarding their views on the functional split versus traditional sectorised model. Space was provided for additional comments. The study used descriptive statistical measures for analysis of its results. Ethical approval was confirmed as not being required for this survey of local services. RESULTS: We had a response rate of 67%. A significant majority (76%) of service users across the four different health boards indicated a preference for the same consultant to manage their care irrespective of whether they were an inpatient or in the community (Chi-squared = 65, df = 1, p < 0.0001). In their unstructured comments patients often mentioned the value of the therapeutic relationship and trust in a single consultant psychiatrist. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey suggests that most patients prefer the traditional model where they see a single consultant throughout their journey of care. The views of patients should be sought as much as possible and should be taken into account when considering the best way to organize psychiatric services. BioMed Central 2013-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3849881/ /pubmed/24074270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-362 Text en Copyright © 2013 Begum et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Begum, Millia Brown, Keith Pelosi, Anthony Crabb, Jim McTaggart, John Mitchell, Caroline Julyan, Everett Donegan, Tony Gotz, Michael Survey of patients' view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists |
title | Survey of patients' view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists |
title_full | Survey of patients' view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists |
title_fullStr | Survey of patients' view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey of patients' view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists |
title_short | Survey of patients' view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists |
title_sort | survey of patients' view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24074270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-362 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT begummillia surveyofpatientsviewonfunctionalsplitofconsultantpsychiatrists AT brownkeith surveyofpatientsviewonfunctionalsplitofconsultantpsychiatrists AT pelosianthony surveyofpatientsviewonfunctionalsplitofconsultantpsychiatrists AT crabbjim surveyofpatientsviewonfunctionalsplitofconsultantpsychiatrists AT mctaggartjohn surveyofpatientsviewonfunctionalsplitofconsultantpsychiatrists AT mitchellcaroline surveyofpatientsviewonfunctionalsplitofconsultantpsychiatrists AT julyaneverett surveyofpatientsviewonfunctionalsplitofconsultantpsychiatrists AT donegantony surveyofpatientsviewonfunctionalsplitofconsultantpsychiatrists AT gotzmichael surveyofpatientsviewonfunctionalsplitofconsultantpsychiatrists |