Cargando…

Current surgical instrument labeling techniques may increase the risk of unintentionally retained foreign objects: a hypothesis

BACKGROUND: Marking of surgical instruments is essential to ensure their proper identification after sterile processing. The National Quality Forum defines unintentionally retained foreign objects in a surgical patient as a serious reportable event also called "never event." PRESENTATION O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ipaktchi, Kyros, Kolnik, Adam, Messina, Michael, Banegas, Rodrigo, Livermore, Meryl, Price, Connie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24079615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-7-31
_version_ 1782294011958001664
author Ipaktchi, Kyros
Kolnik, Adam
Messina, Michael
Banegas, Rodrigo
Livermore, Meryl
Price, Connie
author_facet Ipaktchi, Kyros
Kolnik, Adam
Messina, Michael
Banegas, Rodrigo
Livermore, Meryl
Price, Connie
author_sort Ipaktchi, Kyros
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Marking of surgical instruments is essential to ensure their proper identification after sterile processing. The National Quality Forum defines unintentionally retained foreign objects in a surgical patient as a serious reportable event also called "never event." PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that established practices of surgical instrument identification using unkempt tape labels and plastic tags may expose patients to "never events" from retained disintegrating labels. TESTING OF THE HYPOTHESIS: We demonstrate the near miss of a "never event" during a surgical case in which the breakage of an instrument label remained initially unwitnessed. A fragment of the plastic label was accidentally found in the wound upon closing. Further clinical testing of the occurrence of this "never event" appears not feasible. As the name implies a patient should never be exposed to the risk of fragmenting labels. IMPLICATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS: Current practice does not mandate verifying intact instrument markers as part of the instrument count. The clinical confirmation of our hypothesis mandates a change in perioperative practice: Mechanical labels need to undergo routine inspection and maintenance. The perioperative count must not only verify the quantity of surgical instruments but also the intactness of labels to ensure that no part of an instrument is left behind. Proactive maintenance of taped and dipped labels should be performed routinely. The implementation of newer labeling technologies - such as laser engraved codes - appears to eliminate risks seen in traditional mechanical labels. This article reviews current instrument marking technologies, highlights shortcomings and recommends safe instrument handling and marking practices implementing newer available technologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3849939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38499392013-12-05 Current surgical instrument labeling techniques may increase the risk of unintentionally retained foreign objects: a hypothesis Ipaktchi, Kyros Kolnik, Adam Messina, Michael Banegas, Rodrigo Livermore, Meryl Price, Connie Patient Saf Surg Hypothesis BACKGROUND: Marking of surgical instruments is essential to ensure their proper identification after sterile processing. The National Quality Forum defines unintentionally retained foreign objects in a surgical patient as a serious reportable event also called "never event." PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that established practices of surgical instrument identification using unkempt tape labels and plastic tags may expose patients to "never events" from retained disintegrating labels. TESTING OF THE HYPOTHESIS: We demonstrate the near miss of a "never event" during a surgical case in which the breakage of an instrument label remained initially unwitnessed. A fragment of the plastic label was accidentally found in the wound upon closing. Further clinical testing of the occurrence of this "never event" appears not feasible. As the name implies a patient should never be exposed to the risk of fragmenting labels. IMPLICATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS: Current practice does not mandate verifying intact instrument markers as part of the instrument count. The clinical confirmation of our hypothesis mandates a change in perioperative practice: Mechanical labels need to undergo routine inspection and maintenance. The perioperative count must not only verify the quantity of surgical instruments but also the intactness of labels to ensure that no part of an instrument is left behind. Proactive maintenance of taped and dipped labels should be performed routinely. The implementation of newer labeling technologies - such as laser engraved codes - appears to eliminate risks seen in traditional mechanical labels. This article reviews current instrument marking technologies, highlights shortcomings and recommends safe instrument handling and marking practices implementing newer available technologies. BioMed Central 2013-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3849939/ /pubmed/24079615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-7-31 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ipaktchi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Ipaktchi, Kyros
Kolnik, Adam
Messina, Michael
Banegas, Rodrigo
Livermore, Meryl
Price, Connie
Current surgical instrument labeling techniques may increase the risk of unintentionally retained foreign objects: a hypothesis
title Current surgical instrument labeling techniques may increase the risk of unintentionally retained foreign objects: a hypothesis
title_full Current surgical instrument labeling techniques may increase the risk of unintentionally retained foreign objects: a hypothesis
title_fullStr Current surgical instrument labeling techniques may increase the risk of unintentionally retained foreign objects: a hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed Current surgical instrument labeling techniques may increase the risk of unintentionally retained foreign objects: a hypothesis
title_short Current surgical instrument labeling techniques may increase the risk of unintentionally retained foreign objects: a hypothesis
title_sort current surgical instrument labeling techniques may increase the risk of unintentionally retained foreign objects: a hypothesis
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24079615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-7-31
work_keys_str_mv AT ipaktchikyros currentsurgicalinstrumentlabelingtechniquesmayincreasetheriskofunintentionallyretainedforeignobjectsahypothesis
AT kolnikadam currentsurgicalinstrumentlabelingtechniquesmayincreasetheriskofunintentionallyretainedforeignobjectsahypothesis
AT messinamichael currentsurgicalinstrumentlabelingtechniquesmayincreasetheriskofunintentionallyretainedforeignobjectsahypothesis
AT banegasrodrigo currentsurgicalinstrumentlabelingtechniquesmayincreasetheriskofunintentionallyretainedforeignobjectsahypothesis
AT livermoremeryl currentsurgicalinstrumentlabelingtechniquesmayincreasetheriskofunintentionallyretainedforeignobjectsahypothesis
AT priceconnie currentsurgicalinstrumentlabelingtechniquesmayincreasetheriskofunintentionallyretainedforeignobjectsahypothesis