Cargando…
Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles
BACKGROUND: This study compares the microdose flare-up protocol to the ultrashort gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) agonist flare combined with the fixed multidose GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royan Institute
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3850311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520450 |
_version_ | 1782294072057135104 |
---|---|
author | Eftekhar, Maryam Mohammadian, Farnaz Yousefnejad, Fariba Khani, Parisa |
author_facet | Eftekhar, Maryam Mohammadian, Farnaz Yousefnejad, Fariba Khani, Parisa |
author_sort | Eftekhar, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study compares the microdose flare-up protocol to the ultrashort gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) agonist flare combined with the fixed multidose GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 120 women who were candidates for assisted reproductive techniques (ART) and had histories of one or more failed in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with three or fewer retrieved oocytes were prospectively randomized into two groups. Group I (60 patients) received the microdose flare-up regimen and group II (60 patients) received the ultrashort GnRH agonist combined with fixed GnRH antagonist. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in the number of used gonadotropin ampoules (p=0.591), duration of stimulation (p=0.610), number of retrieved oocytes (p=0.802), fertilization rate (p=0.456), and the number of transferred embryos (p=0.954). The clinical pregnancy rates were statistically similar in group I (10%) compared with group II (13.3%, p=0.389). CONCLUSION: According to our results, there is no significant difference between these protocols for improving the ART outcome in poor responders. Additional prospective, randomized studies with more patients is necessary to determine the best protocol (Registration Number: IRCT201105096420N1). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3850311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Royan Institute |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38503112014-02-11 Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles Eftekhar, Maryam Mohammadian, Farnaz Yousefnejad, Fariba Khani, Parisa Int J Fertil Steril Original Article BACKGROUND: This study compares the microdose flare-up protocol to the ultrashort gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) agonist flare combined with the fixed multidose GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 120 women who were candidates for assisted reproductive techniques (ART) and had histories of one or more failed in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with three or fewer retrieved oocytes were prospectively randomized into two groups. Group I (60 patients) received the microdose flare-up regimen and group II (60 patients) received the ultrashort GnRH agonist combined with fixed GnRH antagonist. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in the number of used gonadotropin ampoules (p=0.591), duration of stimulation (p=0.610), number of retrieved oocytes (p=0.802), fertilization rate (p=0.456), and the number of transferred embryos (p=0.954). The clinical pregnancy rates were statistically similar in group I (10%) compared with group II (13.3%, p=0.389). CONCLUSION: According to our results, there is no significant difference between these protocols for improving the ART outcome in poor responders. Additional prospective, randomized studies with more patients is necessary to determine the best protocol (Registration Number: IRCT201105096420N1). Royan Institute 2013 2013-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3850311/ /pubmed/24520450 Text en Any use, distribution, reproduction or abstract of this publication in any medium, with the exception of commercial purposes, is permitted provided the original work is properly cited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Eftekhar, Maryam Mohammadian, Farnaz Yousefnejad, Fariba Khani, Parisa Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles |
title | Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist
Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of
Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles |
title_full | Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist
Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of
Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles |
title_fullStr | Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist
Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of
Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles |
title_full_unstemmed | Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist
Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of
Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles |
title_short | Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist
Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of
Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles |
title_sort | microdose gnrh agonist flare-up versus ultrashort gnrh agonist
combined with fixed gnrh antagonist in poor responders of
assisted reproductive techniques cycles |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3850311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520450 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eftekharmaryam microdosegnrhagonistflareupversusultrashortgnrhagonistcombinedwithfixedgnrhantagonistinpoorrespondersofassistedreproductivetechniquescycles AT mohammadianfarnaz microdosegnrhagonistflareupversusultrashortgnrhagonistcombinedwithfixedgnrhantagonistinpoorrespondersofassistedreproductivetechniquescycles AT yousefnejadfariba microdosegnrhagonistflareupversusultrashortgnrhagonistcombinedwithfixedgnrhantagonistinpoorrespondersofassistedreproductivetechniquescycles AT khaniparisa microdosegnrhagonistflareupversusultrashortgnrhagonistcombinedwithfixedgnrhantagonistinpoorrespondersofassistedreproductivetechniquescycles |