Cargando…

Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles

BACKGROUND: This study compares the microdose flare-up protocol to the ultrashort gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) agonist flare combined with the fixed multidose GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eftekhar, Maryam, Mohammadian, Farnaz, Yousefnejad, Fariba, Khani, Parisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royan Institute 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3850311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520450
_version_ 1782294072057135104
author Eftekhar, Maryam
Mohammadian, Farnaz
Yousefnejad, Fariba
Khani, Parisa
author_facet Eftekhar, Maryam
Mohammadian, Farnaz
Yousefnejad, Fariba
Khani, Parisa
author_sort Eftekhar, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compares the microdose flare-up protocol to the ultrashort gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) agonist flare combined with the fixed multidose GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 120 women who were candidates for assisted reproductive techniques (ART) and had histories of one or more failed in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with three or fewer retrieved oocytes were prospectively randomized into two groups. Group I (60 patients) received the microdose flare-up regimen and group II (60 patients) received the ultrashort GnRH agonist combined with fixed GnRH antagonist. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in the number of used gonadotropin ampoules (p=0.591), duration of stimulation (p=0.610), number of retrieved oocytes (p=0.802), fertilization rate (p=0.456), and the number of transferred embryos (p=0.954). The clinical pregnancy rates were statistically similar in group I (10%) compared with group II (13.3%, p=0.389). CONCLUSION: According to our results, there is no significant difference between these protocols for improving the ART outcome in poor responders. Additional prospective, randomized studies with more patients is necessary to determine the best protocol (Registration Number: IRCT201105096420N1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3850311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Royan Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38503112014-02-11 Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles Eftekhar, Maryam Mohammadian, Farnaz Yousefnejad, Fariba Khani, Parisa Int J Fertil Steril Original Article BACKGROUND: This study compares the microdose flare-up protocol to the ultrashort gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) agonist flare combined with the fixed multidose GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 120 women who were candidates for assisted reproductive techniques (ART) and had histories of one or more failed in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with three or fewer retrieved oocytes were prospectively randomized into two groups. Group I (60 patients) received the microdose flare-up regimen and group II (60 patients) received the ultrashort GnRH agonist combined with fixed GnRH antagonist. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in the number of used gonadotropin ampoules (p=0.591), duration of stimulation (p=0.610), number of retrieved oocytes (p=0.802), fertilization rate (p=0.456), and the number of transferred embryos (p=0.954). The clinical pregnancy rates were statistically similar in group I (10%) compared with group II (13.3%, p=0.389). CONCLUSION: According to our results, there is no significant difference between these protocols for improving the ART outcome in poor responders. Additional prospective, randomized studies with more patients is necessary to determine the best protocol (Registration Number: IRCT201105096420N1). Royan Institute 2013 2013-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3850311/ /pubmed/24520450 Text en Any use, distribution, reproduction or abstract of this publication in any medium, with the exception of commercial purposes, is permitted provided the original work is properly cited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Eftekhar, Maryam
Mohammadian, Farnaz
Yousefnejad, Fariba
Khani, Parisa
Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles
title Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles
title_full Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles
title_fullStr Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles
title_full_unstemmed Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles
title_short Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles
title_sort microdose gnrh agonist flare-up versus ultrashort gnrh agonist combined with fixed gnrh antagonist in poor responders of assisted reproductive techniques cycles
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3850311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520450
work_keys_str_mv AT eftekharmaryam microdosegnrhagonistflareupversusultrashortgnrhagonistcombinedwithfixedgnrhantagonistinpoorrespondersofassistedreproductivetechniquescycles
AT mohammadianfarnaz microdosegnrhagonistflareupversusultrashortgnrhagonistcombinedwithfixedgnrhantagonistinpoorrespondersofassistedreproductivetechniquescycles
AT yousefnejadfariba microdosegnrhagonistflareupversusultrashortgnrhagonistcombinedwithfixedgnrhantagonistinpoorrespondersofassistedreproductivetechniquescycles
AT khaniparisa microdosegnrhagonistflareupversusultrashortgnrhagonistcombinedwithfixedgnrhantagonistinpoorrespondersofassistedreproductivetechniquescycles