Cargando…

Evaluation of remote monitoring of parturition in dairy cattle as a new tool for calving management

BACKGROUND: Proper calving management of dairy herds is a crucial aspect of the bovine life cycle, as it has profound effects on calf viability and on the post-partum course of the dam. The objectives of this study were to monitor the calving process through the use of a remote alarm system and to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palombi, Claudio, Paolucci, Marco, Stradaioli, Giuseppe, Corubolo, Mario, Pascolo, Paolo B, Monaci, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3850716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24079910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-191
_version_ 1782294150138298368
author Palombi, Claudio
Paolucci, Marco
Stradaioli, Giuseppe
Corubolo, Mario
Pascolo, Paolo B
Monaci, Maurizio
author_facet Palombi, Claudio
Paolucci, Marco
Stradaioli, Giuseppe
Corubolo, Mario
Pascolo, Paolo B
Monaci, Maurizio
author_sort Palombi, Claudio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proper calving management of dairy herds is a crucial aspect of the bovine life cycle, as it has profound effects on calf viability and on the post-partum course of the dam. The objectives of this study were to monitor the calving process through the use of a remote alarm system and to determine the impact of prompt emergency obstetric procedures in case of dystocia for the prevention of stillbirths and post-partum reproductive pathologies, and for improving herd fertility. Six groups of experimental animals were studied: monitored heifers (n = 60) and multiparous cows (n = 60) were compared with non-observed animals (n = 60 heifers and n = 60 multiparous) giving birth during the same time period and housed in the calving barn, and with unmonitored animals placed in a dry zone (n = 240 heifers and n = 112 multiparous cows). RESULTS: The incidence of dystocia ranged from a minimum of 23.4% (monitored multiparous cows) to a maximum of 33.3% (monitored heifers), and there were no differences compared with control groups. However, the rate of stillbirth was higher in control groups than in the monitored groups (P < 0.01). Among both heifers and multiparous cows, the incidence of post-partum uterine infections was higher in the unmonitored animals both in the calving barn (P < 0.01) and in the dry zone (P < 0.05) compared with monitored animals. Among both heifers and multiparous cows, the control groups showed higher rates of foetal membrane retention than did the monitored groups (P < 0.001). The calving-to-conception interval was shorter; in particular, observed heifers showed a significant advantage of approximately 46 days compared with the unmonitored group (P < 0.001) and 32 days compared with the group in the calving barn (P < 0.05). Multiparous cows also had a reduction in the number of days open. CONCLUSIONS: The remote alarm system used to monitor the calving process assured the prompt presence of personnel, improving both the cow’s reproductive efficiency and neonatal viability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3850716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38507162013-12-16 Evaluation of remote monitoring of parturition in dairy cattle as a new tool for calving management Palombi, Claudio Paolucci, Marco Stradaioli, Giuseppe Corubolo, Mario Pascolo, Paolo B Monaci, Maurizio BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Proper calving management of dairy herds is a crucial aspect of the bovine life cycle, as it has profound effects on calf viability and on the post-partum course of the dam. The objectives of this study were to monitor the calving process through the use of a remote alarm system and to determine the impact of prompt emergency obstetric procedures in case of dystocia for the prevention of stillbirths and post-partum reproductive pathologies, and for improving herd fertility. Six groups of experimental animals were studied: monitored heifers (n = 60) and multiparous cows (n = 60) were compared with non-observed animals (n = 60 heifers and n = 60 multiparous) giving birth during the same time period and housed in the calving barn, and with unmonitored animals placed in a dry zone (n = 240 heifers and n = 112 multiparous cows). RESULTS: The incidence of dystocia ranged from a minimum of 23.4% (monitored multiparous cows) to a maximum of 33.3% (monitored heifers), and there were no differences compared with control groups. However, the rate of stillbirth was higher in control groups than in the monitored groups (P < 0.01). Among both heifers and multiparous cows, the incidence of post-partum uterine infections was higher in the unmonitored animals both in the calving barn (P < 0.01) and in the dry zone (P < 0.05) compared with monitored animals. Among both heifers and multiparous cows, the control groups showed higher rates of foetal membrane retention than did the monitored groups (P < 0.001). The calving-to-conception interval was shorter; in particular, observed heifers showed a significant advantage of approximately 46 days compared with the unmonitored group (P < 0.001) and 32 days compared with the group in the calving barn (P < 0.05). Multiparous cows also had a reduction in the number of days open. CONCLUSIONS: The remote alarm system used to monitor the calving process assured the prompt presence of personnel, improving both the cow’s reproductive efficiency and neonatal viability. BioMed Central 2013-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3850716/ /pubmed/24079910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-191 Text en Copyright © 2013 Palombi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Palombi, Claudio
Paolucci, Marco
Stradaioli, Giuseppe
Corubolo, Mario
Pascolo, Paolo B
Monaci, Maurizio
Evaluation of remote monitoring of parturition in dairy cattle as a new tool for calving management
title Evaluation of remote monitoring of parturition in dairy cattle as a new tool for calving management
title_full Evaluation of remote monitoring of parturition in dairy cattle as a new tool for calving management
title_fullStr Evaluation of remote monitoring of parturition in dairy cattle as a new tool for calving management
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of remote monitoring of parturition in dairy cattle as a new tool for calving management
title_short Evaluation of remote monitoring of parturition in dairy cattle as a new tool for calving management
title_sort evaluation of remote monitoring of parturition in dairy cattle as a new tool for calving management
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3850716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24079910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-191
work_keys_str_mv AT palombiclaudio evaluationofremotemonitoringofparturitionindairycattleasanewtoolforcalvingmanagement
AT paoluccimarco evaluationofremotemonitoringofparturitionindairycattleasanewtoolforcalvingmanagement
AT stradaioligiuseppe evaluationofremotemonitoringofparturitionindairycattleasanewtoolforcalvingmanagement
AT corubolomario evaluationofremotemonitoringofparturitionindairycattleasanewtoolforcalvingmanagement
AT pascolopaolob evaluationofremotemonitoringofparturitionindairycattleasanewtoolforcalvingmanagement
AT monacimaurizio evaluationofremotemonitoringofparturitionindairycattleasanewtoolforcalvingmanagement