Cargando…
Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery
BACKGROUND: In the late '80s the successes of the laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder disease laid the foundations on the modern use of this surgical technique in a variety of diseases. In the last 20 years, laparoscopic colorectal surgery had become a popular treatment option for colorectal c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24267544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S12 |
_version_ | 1782294252853657600 |
---|---|
author | Biondi, Antonio Grosso, Giuseppe Mistretta, Antonio Marventano, Stefano Toscano, Chiara Drago, Filippo Gangi, Santi Basile, Francesco |
author_facet | Biondi, Antonio Grosso, Giuseppe Mistretta, Antonio Marventano, Stefano Toscano, Chiara Drago, Filippo Gangi, Santi Basile, Francesco |
author_sort | Biondi, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the late '80s the successes of the laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder disease laid the foundations on the modern use of this surgical technique in a variety of diseases. In the last 20 years, laparoscopic colorectal surgery had become a popular treatment option for colorectal cancer patients. DISCUSSION: Many studies emphasized on the benefits stating the significant advantages of the laparoscopic approach compared with the open surgery of reduced blood loss, early return of intestinal motility, lower overall morbidity, and shorter duration of hospital stay, leading to a general agreement on laparoscopic surgery as an alternative to conventional open surgery for colon cancer. The reduced hospital stay may also decrease the cost of the laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, despite th higher operative spending compared with open surgery. The average reduction in total direct costs is difficult to define due to the increasing cost over time, making challenging the comparisons between studies conducted during a time range of more than 10 years. However, despite the theoretical advantages of laparoscopic surgery, it is still not considered the standard treatment for colorectal cancer patients due to technical limitations or the characteristics of the patients that may affect short and long term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach to colectomy is slowly gaining acceptance for the management of colorectal pathology. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer demonstrates better short-term outcome, oncologic safety, and equivalent long-term outcome of open surgery. For rectal cancer, laparoscopic technique can be more complex depending on the tumor location. The advantages of minimally invasive surgery may translate better care quality for oncological patients and lead to increased cost saving through the introduction of active enhanced recovery programs which are likely cost-effective from the perspective of the hospital health-care providers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3851244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38512442013-12-13 Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery Biondi, Antonio Grosso, Giuseppe Mistretta, Antonio Marventano, Stefano Toscano, Chiara Drago, Filippo Gangi, Santi Basile, Francesco BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: In the late '80s the successes of the laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder disease laid the foundations on the modern use of this surgical technique in a variety of diseases. In the last 20 years, laparoscopic colorectal surgery had become a popular treatment option for colorectal cancer patients. DISCUSSION: Many studies emphasized on the benefits stating the significant advantages of the laparoscopic approach compared with the open surgery of reduced blood loss, early return of intestinal motility, lower overall morbidity, and shorter duration of hospital stay, leading to a general agreement on laparoscopic surgery as an alternative to conventional open surgery for colon cancer. The reduced hospital stay may also decrease the cost of the laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, despite th higher operative spending compared with open surgery. The average reduction in total direct costs is difficult to define due to the increasing cost over time, making challenging the comparisons between studies conducted during a time range of more than 10 years. However, despite the theoretical advantages of laparoscopic surgery, it is still not considered the standard treatment for colorectal cancer patients due to technical limitations or the characteristics of the patients that may affect short and long term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach to colectomy is slowly gaining acceptance for the management of colorectal pathology. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer demonstrates better short-term outcome, oncologic safety, and equivalent long-term outcome of open surgery. For rectal cancer, laparoscopic technique can be more complex depending on the tumor location. The advantages of minimally invasive surgery may translate better care quality for oncological patients and lead to increased cost saving through the introduction of active enhanced recovery programs which are likely cost-effective from the perspective of the hospital health-care providers. BioMed Central 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3851244/ /pubmed/24267544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S12 Text en Copyright © 2013 Biondi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Biondi, Antonio Grosso, Giuseppe Mistretta, Antonio Marventano, Stefano Toscano, Chiara Drago, Filippo Gangi, Santi Basile, Francesco Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery |
title | Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery |
title_full | Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery |
title_short | Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery |
title_sort | laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24267544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biondiantonio laparoscopicvsopenapproachforcolorectalcancerevolutionovertimeofminimalinvasivesurgery AT grossogiuseppe laparoscopicvsopenapproachforcolorectalcancerevolutionovertimeofminimalinvasivesurgery AT mistrettaantonio laparoscopicvsopenapproachforcolorectalcancerevolutionovertimeofminimalinvasivesurgery AT marventanostefano laparoscopicvsopenapproachforcolorectalcancerevolutionovertimeofminimalinvasivesurgery AT toscanochiara laparoscopicvsopenapproachforcolorectalcancerevolutionovertimeofminimalinvasivesurgery AT dragofilippo laparoscopicvsopenapproachforcolorectalcancerevolutionovertimeofminimalinvasivesurgery AT gangisanti laparoscopicvsopenapproachforcolorectalcancerevolutionovertimeofminimalinvasivesurgery AT basilefrancesco laparoscopicvsopenapproachforcolorectalcancerevolutionovertimeofminimalinvasivesurgery |