Cargando…

Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy

INTRODUCTION: We describe five patients receiving a re-implantation (RI) after post-operative dosimetry of the primary 125-I permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer revealed an insufficient dose coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five out of 222 consecutive patients treated (from Mar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putora, Paul Martin, Plasswilm, Ludwig, Seelentag, Wolf, Schiefer, Johann, Markart, Patrick, Schmid, Hans-Peter, Engeler, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-194
_version_ 1782294305943060480
author Putora, Paul Martin
Plasswilm, Ludwig
Seelentag, Wolf
Schiefer, Johann
Markart, Patrick
Schmid, Hans-Peter
Engeler, Daniel
author_facet Putora, Paul Martin
Plasswilm, Ludwig
Seelentag, Wolf
Schiefer, Johann
Markart, Patrick
Schmid, Hans-Peter
Engeler, Daniel
author_sort Putora, Paul Martin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We describe five patients receiving a re-implantation (RI) after post-operative dosimetry of the primary 125-I permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer revealed an insufficient dose coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five out of 222 consecutive patients treated (from March, 2001 to August, 2012) with 125-I BT, received a RI after dosimetric verification by CT and MRI fusion four to eight weeks after implantation displayed an insufficient dose coverage. RIs were performed with 10 to 19 seeds, three to four months after primary intervention. Dosimetry after RI showed an improved and sufficient total dose coverage in all patients. RESULTS: At last follow-up (18 to 99 months, median 57 months), none of the patients had relevant implant associated side-effects. Functional outcome was comparable to patients after one-time implantation. PSA levels post intervention showed a decreasing tendency in 4 patients. One patient had a local recurrence after 12 months. CONCLUSION: In our series, approximately 2% of the patients treated with permanent prostate BT required a RI due to insufficient dose coverage. None of the patients who underwent RI experienced complications. Our series, although only with 5 cases and limited follow-up, along with other published reports, demonstrates good tolerability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3851561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38515612013-12-06 Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy Putora, Paul Martin Plasswilm, Ludwig Seelentag, Wolf Schiefer, Johann Markart, Patrick Schmid, Hans-Peter Engeler, Daniel Radiat Oncol Research INTRODUCTION: We describe five patients receiving a re-implantation (RI) after post-operative dosimetry of the primary 125-I permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer revealed an insufficient dose coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five out of 222 consecutive patients treated (from March, 2001 to August, 2012) with 125-I BT, received a RI after dosimetric verification by CT and MRI fusion four to eight weeks after implantation displayed an insufficient dose coverage. RIs were performed with 10 to 19 seeds, three to four months after primary intervention. Dosimetry after RI showed an improved and sufficient total dose coverage in all patients. RESULTS: At last follow-up (18 to 99 months, median 57 months), none of the patients had relevant implant associated side-effects. Functional outcome was comparable to patients after one-time implantation. PSA levels post intervention showed a decreasing tendency in 4 patients. One patient had a local recurrence after 12 months. CONCLUSION: In our series, approximately 2% of the patients treated with permanent prostate BT required a RI due to insufficient dose coverage. None of the patients who underwent RI experienced complications. Our series, although only with 5 cases and limited follow-up, along with other published reports, demonstrates good tolerability. BioMed Central 2013-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3851561/ /pubmed/23915390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-194 Text en Copyright © 2013 Putora et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Putora, Paul Martin
Plasswilm, Ludwig
Seelentag, Wolf
Schiefer, Johann
Markart, Patrick
Schmid, Hans-Peter
Engeler, Daniel
Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy
title Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy
title_full Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy
title_fullStr Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy
title_short Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy
title_sort re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-194
work_keys_str_mv AT putorapaulmartin reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT plasswilmludwig reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT seelentagwolf reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT schieferjohann reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT markartpatrick reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT schmidhanspeter reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy
AT engelerdaniel reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy