Cargando…
Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy
INTRODUCTION: We describe five patients receiving a re-implantation (RI) after post-operative dosimetry of the primary 125-I permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer revealed an insufficient dose coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five out of 222 consecutive patients treated (from Mar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-194 |
_version_ | 1782294305943060480 |
---|---|
author | Putora, Paul Martin Plasswilm, Ludwig Seelentag, Wolf Schiefer, Johann Markart, Patrick Schmid, Hans-Peter Engeler, Daniel |
author_facet | Putora, Paul Martin Plasswilm, Ludwig Seelentag, Wolf Schiefer, Johann Markart, Patrick Schmid, Hans-Peter Engeler, Daniel |
author_sort | Putora, Paul Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We describe five patients receiving a re-implantation (RI) after post-operative dosimetry of the primary 125-I permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer revealed an insufficient dose coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five out of 222 consecutive patients treated (from March, 2001 to August, 2012) with 125-I BT, received a RI after dosimetric verification by CT and MRI fusion four to eight weeks after implantation displayed an insufficient dose coverage. RIs were performed with 10 to 19 seeds, three to four months after primary intervention. Dosimetry after RI showed an improved and sufficient total dose coverage in all patients. RESULTS: At last follow-up (18 to 99 months, median 57 months), none of the patients had relevant implant associated side-effects. Functional outcome was comparable to patients after one-time implantation. PSA levels post intervention showed a decreasing tendency in 4 patients. One patient had a local recurrence after 12 months. CONCLUSION: In our series, approximately 2% of the patients treated with permanent prostate BT required a RI due to insufficient dose coverage. None of the patients who underwent RI experienced complications. Our series, although only with 5 cases and limited follow-up, along with other published reports, demonstrates good tolerability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3851561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38515612013-12-06 Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy Putora, Paul Martin Plasswilm, Ludwig Seelentag, Wolf Schiefer, Johann Markart, Patrick Schmid, Hans-Peter Engeler, Daniel Radiat Oncol Research INTRODUCTION: We describe five patients receiving a re-implantation (RI) after post-operative dosimetry of the primary 125-I permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer revealed an insufficient dose coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five out of 222 consecutive patients treated (from March, 2001 to August, 2012) with 125-I BT, received a RI after dosimetric verification by CT and MRI fusion four to eight weeks after implantation displayed an insufficient dose coverage. RIs were performed with 10 to 19 seeds, three to four months after primary intervention. Dosimetry after RI showed an improved and sufficient total dose coverage in all patients. RESULTS: At last follow-up (18 to 99 months, median 57 months), none of the patients had relevant implant associated side-effects. Functional outcome was comparable to patients after one-time implantation. PSA levels post intervention showed a decreasing tendency in 4 patients. One patient had a local recurrence after 12 months. CONCLUSION: In our series, approximately 2% of the patients treated with permanent prostate BT required a RI due to insufficient dose coverage. None of the patients who underwent RI experienced complications. Our series, although only with 5 cases and limited follow-up, along with other published reports, demonstrates good tolerability. BioMed Central 2013-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3851561/ /pubmed/23915390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-194 Text en Copyright © 2013 Putora et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Putora, Paul Martin Plasswilm, Ludwig Seelentag, Wolf Schiefer, Johann Markart, Patrick Schmid, Hans-Peter Engeler, Daniel Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title | Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title_full | Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title_fullStr | Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title_short | Re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy |
title_sort | re-implantation after insufficient primary 125-i permanent prostate brachytherapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT putorapaulmartin reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT plasswilmludwig reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT seelentagwolf reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT schieferjohann reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT markartpatrick reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT schmidhanspeter reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy AT engelerdaniel reimplantationafterinsufficientprimary125ipermanentprostatebrachytherapy |