Cargando…
The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty
The relative contributions of objects (i.e., object-based) and underlying spatial (i.e., space-based representations) to attentional prioritization and selection remain unclear. In most experimental circumstances, the two representations overlap thus their respective contributions cannot be evaluate...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2013.00088 |
_version_ | 1782294350319845376 |
---|---|
author | Drummond, Leslie Shomstein, Sarah |
author_facet | Drummond, Leslie Shomstein, Sarah |
author_sort | Drummond, Leslie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The relative contributions of objects (i.e., object-based) and underlying spatial (i.e., space-based representations) to attentional prioritization and selection remain unclear. In most experimental circumstances, the two representations overlap thus their respective contributions cannot be evaluated. Here, a dynamic version of the two-rectangle paradigm allowed for a successful de-coupling of spatial and object representations. Space-based (cued spatial location), cued end of the object, and object-based (locations within the cued object) effects were sampled at several timepoints following the cue with high or low certainty as to target location. In the high uncertainty condition spatial benefits prevailed throughout most of the timecourse, as evidenced by facilitatory and inhibitory effects. Additionally, the cued end of the object, rather than a whole object, received the attentional benefit. When target location was predictable (low uncertainty manipulation), only probabilities guided selection (i.e., evidence by a benefit for the statistically biased location). These results suggest that with high spatial uncertainty, all available information present within the stimulus display is used for the purposes of attentional selection (e.g., spatial locations, cued end of the object) albeit to varying degrees and at different time points. However, as certainty increases, only spatial certainty guides selection (i.e., object ends and whole objects are filtered out). Taken together, these results further elucidate the contributing role of space- and object-representations to attentional guidance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3851778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38517782013-12-23 The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty Drummond, Leslie Shomstein, Sarah Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience The relative contributions of objects (i.e., object-based) and underlying spatial (i.e., space-based representations) to attentional prioritization and selection remain unclear. In most experimental circumstances, the two representations overlap thus their respective contributions cannot be evaluated. Here, a dynamic version of the two-rectangle paradigm allowed for a successful de-coupling of spatial and object representations. Space-based (cued spatial location), cued end of the object, and object-based (locations within the cued object) effects were sampled at several timepoints following the cue with high or low certainty as to target location. In the high uncertainty condition spatial benefits prevailed throughout most of the timecourse, as evidenced by facilitatory and inhibitory effects. Additionally, the cued end of the object, rather than a whole object, received the attentional benefit. When target location was predictable (low uncertainty manipulation), only probabilities guided selection (i.e., evidence by a benefit for the statistically biased location). These results suggest that with high spatial uncertainty, all available information present within the stimulus display is used for the purposes of attentional selection (e.g., spatial locations, cued end of the object) albeit to varying degrees and at different time points. However, as certainty increases, only spatial certainty guides selection (i.e., object ends and whole objects are filtered out). Taken together, these results further elucidate the contributing role of space- and object-representations to attentional guidance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3851778/ /pubmed/24367302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2013.00088 Text en Copyright © 2013 Drummond and Shomstein. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Drummond, Leslie Shomstein, Sarah The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty |
title | The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty |
title_full | The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty |
title_fullStr | The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty |
title_full_unstemmed | The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty |
title_short | The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty |
title_sort | timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2013.00088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drummondleslie thetimecourseofspaceandobjectbasedattentionalprioritizationwithvaryingdegreesofcertainty AT shomsteinsarah thetimecourseofspaceandobjectbasedattentionalprioritizationwithvaryingdegreesofcertainty AT drummondleslie timecourseofspaceandobjectbasedattentionalprioritizationwithvaryingdegreesofcertainty AT shomsteinsarah timecourseofspaceandobjectbasedattentionalprioritizationwithvaryingdegreesofcertainty |