Cargando…
Less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection
BACKGROUND: Some manufacturers recommend using 1.1 mL per application of alcohol-based handrubs for effective hand disinfection. However, whether this volume is sufficient to cover both hands, as recommended by the World Health Organization, and fulfills current efficacy standards is unknown. This s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24112994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-472 |
_version_ | 1782294357491056640 |
---|---|
author | Kampf, Günter Ruselack, Sigunde Eggerstedt, Sven Nowak, Nicolas Bashir, Muhammad |
author_facet | Kampf, Günter Ruselack, Sigunde Eggerstedt, Sven Nowak, Nicolas Bashir, Muhammad |
author_sort | Kampf, Günter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Some manufacturers recommend using 1.1 mL per application of alcohol-based handrubs for effective hand disinfection. However, whether this volume is sufficient to cover both hands, as recommended by the World Health Organization, and fulfills current efficacy standards is unknown. This study aimed to determine hand coverage for three handrubs (two gels based on 70% v/v and 85% w/w ethanol and a foam based on 70% v/v ethanol) applied at various volumes. METHODS: Products were tested at product volumes of 1.1 mL, 2 mL, 2.4 mL as well as 1 and 2 pump dispenser pushes; the foam product was tested in addition at foam volumes of 1.1 mL, 2 mL, and 2.4 mL. Products were supplemented with a fluorescent dye and 15 participants applied products using responsible application techniques without any specific steps but the aim of completely covering both hands. Coverage quality was determined under ultraviolet light by two blinded investigators. Efficacy of the three handrubs was determined according to ASTM E 1174-06 and ASTM E 2755-10. For each experiment, the hands of 12 participants were contaminated with Serratia marcescens and the products applied as recommended (1.1 mL for 70% v/v ethanol products; 2 mL for the 85% w/w ethanol product). Log(10)-reduction was calculated. RESULTS: Volumes < 2 mL yielded high rates of incomplete coverage (67%–87%) whereas volumes ≥ 2 mL gave lower rates (13%–53%). Differences in coverage were significant between the five volumes tested for all handrubs (p < 0.001; two-way ANOVA) but not between the three handrubs themselves (p = 0.796). Application of 1.1 mL of 70% v/v ethanol rubs reduced contamination by 1.85 log(10) or 1.60 log(10) (ASTM E 1174-06); this failed the US FDA efficacy requirement of at least 2 log(10). Application of 2 mL of the 85% w/w ethanol rub reduced contamination by 2.06 log(10) (ASTM E 1174-06), fulfilling the US FDA efficacy requirement. Similar results were obtained according to ASTM E 2755-10. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicated that handrubs based on 70% ethanol (v/v) with a recommended volume of 1.1 mL per application do not ensure complete coverage of both hands and do not achieve current ASTM efficacy standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3851816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38518162013-12-06 Less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection Kampf, Günter Ruselack, Sigunde Eggerstedt, Sven Nowak, Nicolas Bashir, Muhammad BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Some manufacturers recommend using 1.1 mL per application of alcohol-based handrubs for effective hand disinfection. However, whether this volume is sufficient to cover both hands, as recommended by the World Health Organization, and fulfills current efficacy standards is unknown. This study aimed to determine hand coverage for three handrubs (two gels based on 70% v/v and 85% w/w ethanol and a foam based on 70% v/v ethanol) applied at various volumes. METHODS: Products were tested at product volumes of 1.1 mL, 2 mL, 2.4 mL as well as 1 and 2 pump dispenser pushes; the foam product was tested in addition at foam volumes of 1.1 mL, 2 mL, and 2.4 mL. Products were supplemented with a fluorescent dye and 15 participants applied products using responsible application techniques without any specific steps but the aim of completely covering both hands. Coverage quality was determined under ultraviolet light by two blinded investigators. Efficacy of the three handrubs was determined according to ASTM E 1174-06 and ASTM E 2755-10. For each experiment, the hands of 12 participants were contaminated with Serratia marcescens and the products applied as recommended (1.1 mL for 70% v/v ethanol products; 2 mL for the 85% w/w ethanol product). Log(10)-reduction was calculated. RESULTS: Volumes < 2 mL yielded high rates of incomplete coverage (67%–87%) whereas volumes ≥ 2 mL gave lower rates (13%–53%). Differences in coverage were significant between the five volumes tested for all handrubs (p < 0.001; two-way ANOVA) but not between the three handrubs themselves (p = 0.796). Application of 1.1 mL of 70% v/v ethanol rubs reduced contamination by 1.85 log(10) or 1.60 log(10) (ASTM E 1174-06); this failed the US FDA efficacy requirement of at least 2 log(10). Application of 2 mL of the 85% w/w ethanol rub reduced contamination by 2.06 log(10) (ASTM E 1174-06), fulfilling the US FDA efficacy requirement. Similar results were obtained according to ASTM E 2755-10. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicated that handrubs based on 70% ethanol (v/v) with a recommended volume of 1.1 mL per application do not ensure complete coverage of both hands and do not achieve current ASTM efficacy standards. BioMed Central 2013-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3851816/ /pubmed/24112994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-472 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kampf et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kampf, Günter Ruselack, Sigunde Eggerstedt, Sven Nowak, Nicolas Bashir, Muhammad Less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection |
title | Less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection |
title_full | Less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection |
title_fullStr | Less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection |
title_full_unstemmed | Less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection |
title_short | Less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection |
title_sort | less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24112994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kampfgunter lessandlessinfluenceofvolumeonhandcoverageandbactericidalefficacyinhanddisinfection AT ruselacksigunde lessandlessinfluenceofvolumeonhandcoverageandbactericidalefficacyinhanddisinfection AT eggerstedtsven lessandlessinfluenceofvolumeonhandcoverageandbactericidalefficacyinhanddisinfection AT nowaknicolas lessandlessinfluenceofvolumeonhandcoverageandbactericidalefficacyinhanddisinfection AT bashirmuhammad lessandlessinfluenceofvolumeonhandcoverageandbactericidalefficacyinhanddisinfection |