Cargando…
Self-collected versus clinician-collected sampling for sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
BACKGROUND: Three meta-analyses and one systematic review have been conducted on the question of whether self-collected specimens are as accurate as clinician-collected specimens for STI screening. However, these reviews predate 2007 and did not analyze rectal or pharyngeal collection sites. Current...
Autores principales: | Taylor, Darlene, Lunny, Carole, Wong, Tom, Gilbert, Mark, Li, Neville, Lester, Richard, Krajden, Mel, Hoang, Linda, Ogilvie, Gina |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3851982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24112441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-93 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Self-Collected versus Clinician-Collected Sampling for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Lunny, Carole, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Short message service (SMS) interventions for the prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review protocol
por: Lunny, Carole, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Effectiveness of text messaging interventions on prevention, detection, treatment, and knowledge outcomes for sexually transmitted infections (STIs)/HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Taylor, Darlene, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
A cohort study comparing rate of repeat testing for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections between clients of an internet-based testing programme and of sexually transmitted infection clinics in Vancouver, Canada
por: Gilbert, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Use of GetCheckedOnline, a Comprehensive Web-based Testing Service for Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections
por: Gilbert, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2017)