Cargando…

FSH in vitro versus LH in vivo: similar genomic effects on the cumulus

The use of gonadotropins to trigger oocyte maturation both in vivo and in vitro has provided precious and powerful knowledge that has significantly increased our understanding of the ovarian function. Moreover, the efficacy of most assisted reproductive technologies (ART) used in both humans and liv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assidi, Mourad, Richard, François J, Sirard, Marc-André
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24066945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-6-68
_version_ 1782478629957009408
author Assidi, Mourad
Richard, François J
Sirard, Marc-André
author_facet Assidi, Mourad
Richard, François J
Sirard, Marc-André
author_sort Assidi, Mourad
collection PubMed
description The use of gonadotropins to trigger oocyte maturation both in vivo and in vitro has provided precious and powerful knowledge that has significantly increased our understanding of the ovarian function. Moreover, the efficacy of most assisted reproductive technologies (ART) used in both humans and livestock species relies on gonadotropin input, mainly FSH and LH. Despite the significant progress achieved and the huge impact of gonadotropins, the exact molecular pathways of the two pituitary hormones, FSH and LH, still remain poorly understood. Moreover, these pathways may not be the same when moving from the in vivo to the in vitro context. This misunderstanding of the intricate synergy between these two hormones leads to a lack of consensus about their use mainly in vitro or in ovulation induction schedules in vivo. In order to optimize their use, additional work is thus required with a special focus on comparing the in vitro versus the in vivo effects. In this context, this overview will briefly summarize the downstream gene expression pathways induced by both FSH in vitro and LH in vivo in the cumulus compartment. Based on recent microarray comparative analysis, we are reporting that in vitro FSH stimulation on cumulus cells appears to achieve at least part of the gene expression activity after in vivo LH stimulation. We are then proposing that the in vitro FSH-response of cumulus cells have similitudes with the in vivo LH-response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3852229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38522292013-12-06 FSH in vitro versus LH in vivo: similar genomic effects on the cumulus Assidi, Mourad Richard, François J Sirard, Marc-André J Ovarian Res Review The use of gonadotropins to trigger oocyte maturation both in vivo and in vitro has provided precious and powerful knowledge that has significantly increased our understanding of the ovarian function. Moreover, the efficacy of most assisted reproductive technologies (ART) used in both humans and livestock species relies on gonadotropin input, mainly FSH and LH. Despite the significant progress achieved and the huge impact of gonadotropins, the exact molecular pathways of the two pituitary hormones, FSH and LH, still remain poorly understood. Moreover, these pathways may not be the same when moving from the in vivo to the in vitro context. This misunderstanding of the intricate synergy between these two hormones leads to a lack of consensus about their use mainly in vitro or in ovulation induction schedules in vivo. In order to optimize their use, additional work is thus required with a special focus on comparing the in vitro versus the in vivo effects. In this context, this overview will briefly summarize the downstream gene expression pathways induced by both FSH in vitro and LH in vivo in the cumulus compartment. Based on recent microarray comparative analysis, we are reporting that in vitro FSH stimulation on cumulus cells appears to achieve at least part of the gene expression activity after in vivo LH stimulation. We are then proposing that the in vitro FSH-response of cumulus cells have similitudes with the in vivo LH-response. BioMed Central 2013-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3852229/ /pubmed/24066945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-6-68 Text en Copyright © 2013 Assidi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Assidi, Mourad
Richard, François J
Sirard, Marc-André
FSH in vitro versus LH in vivo: similar genomic effects on the cumulus
title FSH in vitro versus LH in vivo: similar genomic effects on the cumulus
title_full FSH in vitro versus LH in vivo: similar genomic effects on the cumulus
title_fullStr FSH in vitro versus LH in vivo: similar genomic effects on the cumulus
title_full_unstemmed FSH in vitro versus LH in vivo: similar genomic effects on the cumulus
title_short FSH in vitro versus LH in vivo: similar genomic effects on the cumulus
title_sort fsh in vitro versus lh in vivo: similar genomic effects on the cumulus
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24066945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-6-68
work_keys_str_mv AT assidimourad fshinvitroversuslhinvivosimilargenomiceffectsonthecumulus
AT richardfrancoisj fshinvitroversuslhinvivosimilargenomiceffectsonthecumulus
AT sirardmarcandre fshinvitroversuslhinvivosimilargenomiceffectsonthecumulus