Cargando…

OWL model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are important for patients, for researchers and for companies. One of the major bottlenecks is patient recruitment. This task requires the matching of a large volume of information about the patient with numerous eligibility criteria, in a logically-complex combination. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dameron, Olivier, Besana, Paolo, Zekri, Oussama, Bourdé, Annabel, Burgun, Anita, Cuggia, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24034867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-4-17
_version_ 1782478642556698624
author Dameron, Olivier
Besana, Paolo
Zekri, Oussama
Bourdé, Annabel
Burgun, Anita
Cuggia, Marc
author_facet Dameron, Olivier
Besana, Paolo
Zekri, Oussama
Bourdé, Annabel
Burgun, Anita
Cuggia, Marc
author_sort Dameron, Olivier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are important for patients, for researchers and for companies. One of the major bottlenecks is patient recruitment. This task requires the matching of a large volume of information about the patient with numerous eligibility criteria, in a logically-complex combination. Moreover, some of the patient’s information necessary to determine the status of the eligibility criteria may not be available at the time of pre-screening. RESULTS: We showed that the classic approach based on negation as failure over-estimates rejection when confronted with partially-known information about the eligibility criteria because it ignores the distinction between a trial for which patient eligibility should be rejected and trials for which patient eligibility cannot be asserted. We have also shown that 58.64% of the values were unknown in the 286 prostate cancer cases examined during the weekly urology multidisciplinary meetings at Rennes’ university hospital between October 2008 and March 2009. We propose an OWL design pattern for modeling eligibility criteria based on the open world assumption to address the missing information problem. We validate our model on a fictitious clinical trial and evaluate it on two real clinical trials. Our approach successfully distinguished clinical trials for which the patient is eligible, clinical trials for which we know that the patient is not eligible and clinical trials for which the patient may be eligible provided that further pieces of information (which we can identify) can be obtained. CONCLUSIONS: OWL-based reasoning based on the open world assumption provides an adequate framework for distinguishing those patients who can confidently be rejected from those whose status cannot be determined. The expected benefits are a reduction of the workload of the physicians and a higher efficiency by allowing them to focus on the patients whose eligibility actually require expertise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3852288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38522882013-12-19 OWL model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information Dameron, Olivier Besana, Paolo Zekri, Oussama Bourdé, Annabel Burgun, Anita Cuggia, Marc J Biomed Semantics Research BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are important for patients, for researchers and for companies. One of the major bottlenecks is patient recruitment. This task requires the matching of a large volume of information about the patient with numerous eligibility criteria, in a logically-complex combination. Moreover, some of the patient’s information necessary to determine the status of the eligibility criteria may not be available at the time of pre-screening. RESULTS: We showed that the classic approach based on negation as failure over-estimates rejection when confronted with partially-known information about the eligibility criteria because it ignores the distinction between a trial for which patient eligibility should be rejected and trials for which patient eligibility cannot be asserted. We have also shown that 58.64% of the values were unknown in the 286 prostate cancer cases examined during the weekly urology multidisciplinary meetings at Rennes’ university hospital between October 2008 and March 2009. We propose an OWL design pattern for modeling eligibility criteria based on the open world assumption to address the missing information problem. We validate our model on a fictitious clinical trial and evaluate it on two real clinical trials. Our approach successfully distinguished clinical trials for which the patient is eligible, clinical trials for which we know that the patient is not eligible and clinical trials for which the patient may be eligible provided that further pieces of information (which we can identify) can be obtained. CONCLUSIONS: OWL-based reasoning based on the open world assumption provides an adequate framework for distinguishing those patients who can confidently be rejected from those whose status cannot be determined. The expected benefits are a reduction of the workload of the physicians and a higher efficiency by allowing them to focus on the patients whose eligibility actually require expertise. BioMed Central 2013-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3852288/ /pubmed/24034867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-4-17 Text en Copyright © 2013 Dameron et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Dameron, Olivier
Besana, Paolo
Zekri, Oussama
Bourdé, Annabel
Burgun, Anita
Cuggia, Marc
OWL model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information
title OWL model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information
title_full OWL model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information
title_fullStr OWL model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information
title_full_unstemmed OWL model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information
title_short OWL model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information
title_sort owl model of clinical trial eligibility criteria compatible with partially-known information
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24034867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-4-17
work_keys_str_mv AT dameronolivier owlmodelofclinicaltrialeligibilitycriteriacompatiblewithpartiallyknowninformation
AT besanapaolo owlmodelofclinicaltrialeligibilitycriteriacompatiblewithpartiallyknowninformation
AT zekrioussama owlmodelofclinicaltrialeligibilitycriteriacompatiblewithpartiallyknowninformation
AT bourdeannabel owlmodelofclinicaltrialeligibilitycriteriacompatiblewithpartiallyknowninformation
AT burgunanita owlmodelofclinicaltrialeligibilitycriteriacompatiblewithpartiallyknowninformation
AT cuggiamarc owlmodelofclinicaltrialeligibilitycriteriacompatiblewithpartiallyknowninformation