Cargando…

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Specific CD8(+) T Cells Rapidly Decline with Antituberculosis Treatment

RATIONALE: Biomarkers associated with response to therapy in tuberculosis could have broad clinical utility. We postulated that the frequency of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) specific CD8(+) T cells, by virtue of detecting intracellular infection, could be a surrogate marker of response to therap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nyendak, Melissa R., Park, Byung, Null, Megan D., Baseke, Joy, Swarbrick, Gwendolyn, Mayanja-Kizza, Harriet, Nsereko, Mary, Johnson, Denise F., Gitta, Phineas, Okwera, Alphonse, Goldberg, Stefan, Bozeman, Lorna, Johnson, John L., Boom, W. Henry, Lewinsohn, Deborah A., Lewinsohn, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081564
Descripción
Sumario:RATIONALE: Biomarkers associated with response to therapy in tuberculosis could have broad clinical utility. We postulated that the frequency of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) specific CD8(+) T cells, by virtue of detecting intracellular infection, could be a surrogate marker of response to therapy and would decrease during effective antituberculosis treatment. Objectives: We sought to determine the relationship of Mtb specific CD4(+) T cells and CD8(+) T cells with duration of antituberculosis treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study, enrolling between June 2008 and August 2010, of HIV-uninfected Ugandan adults (n = 50) with acid-fast bacillus smear-positive, culture confirmed pulmonary TB at the onset of antituberculosis treatment and the Mtb specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses to ESAT-6 and CFP-10 were measured by IFN-γ ELISPOT at enrollment, week 8 and 24. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the Mtb specific CD8(+) T response, but not the CD4(+) T cell response, over 24 weeks of antituberculosis treatment (p<0.0001), with an early difference observed at 8 weeks of therapy (p = 0.023). At 24 weeks, the estimated Mtb specific CD8(+) T cell response decreased by 58%. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the Mtb specific CD4(+) T cell during the treatment. The Mtb specific CD4(+) T cell response, but not the CD8(+) response, was negatively impacted by the body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide evidence that the Mtb specific CD8(+) T cell response declines with antituberculosis treatment and could be a surrogate marker of response to therapy. Additional research is needed to determine if the Mtb specific CD8(+) T cell response can detect early treatment failure, relapse, or to predict disease progression.