Cargando…

Feasibility intervention trial of two types of improved cookstoves in three resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Exposure to biomass fuel smoke is one of the leading risk factors for disease burden worldwide. International campaigns are currently promoting the widespread adoption of improved cookstoves in resource-limited settings, yet little is known about the cultural and social barriers to succe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klasen, Elizabeth, Miranda, J Jaime, Khatry, Subarna, Menya, Diana, Gilman, Robert H, Tielsch, James M, Kennedy, Caitlin, Dreibelbis, Robert, Naithani, Neha, Kimaiyo, Sylvester, Chiang, Marilu, Carter, E Jane, Sherman, Charles B, Breysse, Patrick N, Checkley, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24112419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-327
_version_ 1782478695450017792
author Klasen, Elizabeth
Miranda, J Jaime
Khatry, Subarna
Menya, Diana
Gilman, Robert H
Tielsch, James M
Kennedy, Caitlin
Dreibelbis, Robert
Naithani, Neha
Kimaiyo, Sylvester
Chiang, Marilu
Carter, E Jane
Sherman, Charles B
Breysse, Patrick N
Checkley, William
author_facet Klasen, Elizabeth
Miranda, J Jaime
Khatry, Subarna
Menya, Diana
Gilman, Robert H
Tielsch, James M
Kennedy, Caitlin
Dreibelbis, Robert
Naithani, Neha
Kimaiyo, Sylvester
Chiang, Marilu
Carter, E Jane
Sherman, Charles B
Breysse, Patrick N
Checkley, William
author_sort Klasen, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exposure to biomass fuel smoke is one of the leading risk factors for disease burden worldwide. International campaigns are currently promoting the widespread adoption of improved cookstoves in resource-limited settings, yet little is known about the cultural and social barriers to successful improved cookstove adoption and how these barriers affect environmental exposures and health outcomes. DESIGN: We plan to conduct a one-year crossover, feasibility intervention trial in three resource-limited settings (Kenya, Nepal and Peru). We will enroll 40 to 46 female primary cooks aged 20 to 49 years in each site (total 120 to 138). METHODS: At baseline, we will collect information on sociodemographic characteristics and cooking practices, and measure respiratory health and blood pressure for all participating women. An initial observational period of four months while households use their traditional, open-fire design cookstoves will take place prior to randomization. All participants will then be randomized to receive one of two types of improved, ventilated cookstoves with a chimney: a commercially-constructed cookstove (Envirofit G3300/G3355) or a locally-constructed cookstove. After four months of observation, participants will crossover and receive the other improved cookstove design and be followed for another four months. During each of the three four-month study periods, we will collect monthly information on self-reported respiratory symptoms, cooking practices, compliance with cookstove use (intervention periods only), and measure peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume at 1 second, exhaled carbon monoxide and blood pressure. We will also measure pulmonary function testing in the women participants and 24-hour kitchen particulate matter and carbon monoxide levels at least once per period. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study will help us better understand the behavioral, biological, and environmental changes that occur with a cookstove intervention. If this trial indicates that reducing indoor air pollution is feasible and effective in resource-limited settings like Peru, Kenya and Nepal, trials and programs to modify the open burning of biomass fuels by installation of low-cost ventilated cookstoves could significantly reduce the burden of illness and death worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01686867
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3852602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38526022013-12-06 Feasibility intervention trial of two types of improved cookstoves in three resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Klasen, Elizabeth Miranda, J Jaime Khatry, Subarna Menya, Diana Gilman, Robert H Tielsch, James M Kennedy, Caitlin Dreibelbis, Robert Naithani, Neha Kimaiyo, Sylvester Chiang, Marilu Carter, E Jane Sherman, Charles B Breysse, Patrick N Checkley, William Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Exposure to biomass fuel smoke is one of the leading risk factors for disease burden worldwide. International campaigns are currently promoting the widespread adoption of improved cookstoves in resource-limited settings, yet little is known about the cultural and social barriers to successful improved cookstove adoption and how these barriers affect environmental exposures and health outcomes. DESIGN: We plan to conduct a one-year crossover, feasibility intervention trial in three resource-limited settings (Kenya, Nepal and Peru). We will enroll 40 to 46 female primary cooks aged 20 to 49 years in each site (total 120 to 138). METHODS: At baseline, we will collect information on sociodemographic characteristics and cooking practices, and measure respiratory health and blood pressure for all participating women. An initial observational period of four months while households use their traditional, open-fire design cookstoves will take place prior to randomization. All participants will then be randomized to receive one of two types of improved, ventilated cookstoves with a chimney: a commercially-constructed cookstove (Envirofit G3300/G3355) or a locally-constructed cookstove. After four months of observation, participants will crossover and receive the other improved cookstove design and be followed for another four months. During each of the three four-month study periods, we will collect monthly information on self-reported respiratory symptoms, cooking practices, compliance with cookstove use (intervention periods only), and measure peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume at 1 second, exhaled carbon monoxide and blood pressure. We will also measure pulmonary function testing in the women participants and 24-hour kitchen particulate matter and carbon monoxide levels at least once per period. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study will help us better understand the behavioral, biological, and environmental changes that occur with a cookstove intervention. If this trial indicates that reducing indoor air pollution is feasible and effective in resource-limited settings like Peru, Kenya and Nepal, trials and programs to modify the open burning of biomass fuels by installation of low-cost ventilated cookstoves could significantly reduce the burden of illness and death worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01686867 BioMed Central 2013-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3852602/ /pubmed/24112419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-327 Text en Copyright © 2013 Klasen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Klasen, Elizabeth
Miranda, J Jaime
Khatry, Subarna
Menya, Diana
Gilman, Robert H
Tielsch, James M
Kennedy, Caitlin
Dreibelbis, Robert
Naithani, Neha
Kimaiyo, Sylvester
Chiang, Marilu
Carter, E Jane
Sherman, Charles B
Breysse, Patrick N
Checkley, William
Feasibility intervention trial of two types of improved cookstoves in three resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Feasibility intervention trial of two types of improved cookstoves in three resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Feasibility intervention trial of two types of improved cookstoves in three resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Feasibility intervention trial of two types of improved cookstoves in three resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility intervention trial of two types of improved cookstoves in three resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Feasibility intervention trial of two types of improved cookstoves in three resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort feasibility intervention trial of two types of improved cookstoves in three resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24112419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-327
work_keys_str_mv AT klasenelizabeth feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mirandajjaime feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT khatrysubarna feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT menyadiana feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gilmanroberth feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tielschjamesm feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kennedycaitlin feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dreibelbisrobert feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT naithanineha feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimaiyosylvester feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chiangmarilu feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT carterejane feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shermancharlesb feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT breyssepatrickn feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT checkleywilliam feasibilityinterventiontrialoftwotypesofimprovedcookstovesinthreeresourcelimitedsettingsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial