Cargando…

Smoke-free or not: a pilot evaluation in selected Beijing Hospitals

BACKGROUND: China enacted a policy to ban smoking in hospitals. The Chinese Association for Tobacco Control (CATC) developed a program to help hospitals implement this policy. They conducted a program and an assessment in 3 Chinese cities (Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong). A more in-depth evaluation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stillman, Frances A, Kaufman, Michelle R, Zhen, Anjie, Yang, Jingyan, Wang, Jiangbo, Zhao, Na
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24134057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-964
_version_ 1782478766593802240
author Stillman, Frances A
Kaufman, Michelle R
Zhen, Anjie
Yang, Jingyan
Wang, Jiangbo
Zhao, Na
author_facet Stillman, Frances A
Kaufman, Michelle R
Zhen, Anjie
Yang, Jingyan
Wang, Jiangbo
Zhao, Na
author_sort Stillman, Frances A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: China enacted a policy to ban smoking in hospitals. The Chinese Association for Tobacco Control (CATC) developed a program to help hospitals implement this policy. They conducted a program and an assessment in 3 Chinese cities (Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong). A more in-depth evaluation was implemented with a sub-sample of hospitals in Beijing (N = 7) to provide an independent assessment. This independent assessment focused on evaluating policy development and an assessment of secondhand smoke (SHS) to determine compliance with the smoke-free policy initiative. METHODS: Pre- and post-survey data were collected at each of the selected hospitals with a total sample of 2835 physicians at pre-intervention and 2812 at post-intervention. Smoking rates pre- and post-policy implementation, change in knowledge, attitudes and practices among physicians, and compliance with policy were assessed. Measurements of airborne nicotine concentrations in selected locations in each hospital were taken: main hospital lobby; main outpatient center; emergency waiting room; and stairwell adjacent to a large inpatient ward. Hospital policies were collected, translated and rated for incorporated components necessary to implement a smoke-free policy. RESULTS: Physicians’ smoking rates decreased and attitudes towards tobacco control improved significantly from pre-to post-intervention. Smoking was still reported in certain areas of the hospital with 96% of passive nicotine monitors as well as self-report indicating continued smoking. Nicotine levels ranged from <0.0056 to 3.94 μg/m(3)), with an overall mean of .667 μg/m(3). Hospitals that established stronger policies seemed to have lower levels of nicotine, suggesting a relationship between policy development and compliance. This finding is interesting but just suggestive and requires further investigation to truly demonstrate if stronger policies improve compliance and produce better outcomes. CONCLUSION: As implementation strategies for smoke-free environments are improved and more resources are focused on hospitals, China is making progress toward achieving smoke-free hospitals. Using a model program could increase the prevalence of SHS policies across China. However, relying only on survey data may not provide an accurate assessment of this progress, and more extensive evaluation efforts are useful to understand how change can and does occur.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3853022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38530222013-12-07 Smoke-free or not: a pilot evaluation in selected Beijing Hospitals Stillman, Frances A Kaufman, Michelle R Zhen, Anjie Yang, Jingyan Wang, Jiangbo Zhao, Na BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: China enacted a policy to ban smoking in hospitals. The Chinese Association for Tobacco Control (CATC) developed a program to help hospitals implement this policy. They conducted a program and an assessment in 3 Chinese cities (Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong). A more in-depth evaluation was implemented with a sub-sample of hospitals in Beijing (N = 7) to provide an independent assessment. This independent assessment focused on evaluating policy development and an assessment of secondhand smoke (SHS) to determine compliance with the smoke-free policy initiative. METHODS: Pre- and post-survey data were collected at each of the selected hospitals with a total sample of 2835 physicians at pre-intervention and 2812 at post-intervention. Smoking rates pre- and post-policy implementation, change in knowledge, attitudes and practices among physicians, and compliance with policy were assessed. Measurements of airborne nicotine concentrations in selected locations in each hospital were taken: main hospital lobby; main outpatient center; emergency waiting room; and stairwell adjacent to a large inpatient ward. Hospital policies were collected, translated and rated for incorporated components necessary to implement a smoke-free policy. RESULTS: Physicians’ smoking rates decreased and attitudes towards tobacco control improved significantly from pre-to post-intervention. Smoking was still reported in certain areas of the hospital with 96% of passive nicotine monitors as well as self-report indicating continued smoking. Nicotine levels ranged from <0.0056 to 3.94 μg/m(3)), with an overall mean of .667 μg/m(3). Hospitals that established stronger policies seemed to have lower levels of nicotine, suggesting a relationship between policy development and compliance. This finding is interesting but just suggestive and requires further investigation to truly demonstrate if stronger policies improve compliance and produce better outcomes. CONCLUSION: As implementation strategies for smoke-free environments are improved and more resources are focused on hospitals, China is making progress toward achieving smoke-free hospitals. Using a model program could increase the prevalence of SHS policies across China. However, relying only on survey data may not provide an accurate assessment of this progress, and more extensive evaluation efforts are useful to understand how change can and does occur. BioMed Central 2013-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3853022/ /pubmed/24134057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-964 Text en Copyright © 2013 Stillman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stillman, Frances A
Kaufman, Michelle R
Zhen, Anjie
Yang, Jingyan
Wang, Jiangbo
Zhao, Na
Smoke-free or not: a pilot evaluation in selected Beijing Hospitals
title Smoke-free or not: a pilot evaluation in selected Beijing Hospitals
title_full Smoke-free or not: a pilot evaluation in selected Beijing Hospitals
title_fullStr Smoke-free or not: a pilot evaluation in selected Beijing Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Smoke-free or not: a pilot evaluation in selected Beijing Hospitals
title_short Smoke-free or not: a pilot evaluation in selected Beijing Hospitals
title_sort smoke-free or not: a pilot evaluation in selected beijing hospitals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24134057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-964
work_keys_str_mv AT stillmanfrancesa smokefreeornotapilotevaluationinselectedbeijinghospitals
AT kaufmanmicheller smokefreeornotapilotevaluationinselectedbeijinghospitals
AT zhenanjie smokefreeornotapilotevaluationinselectedbeijinghospitals
AT yangjingyan smokefreeornotapilotevaluationinselectedbeijinghospitals
AT wangjiangbo smokefreeornotapilotevaluationinselectedbeijinghospitals
AT zhaona smokefreeornotapilotevaluationinselectedbeijinghospitals