Cargando…
Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda
BACKGROUND: Provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) is based on information-giving while voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) includes individualised client-centered counseling. It is not known if the provider-client experiences, perceptions and client satisfaction with the informat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-423 |
_version_ | 1782478798213611520 |
---|---|
author | Wanyenze, Rhoda K Kyaddondo, David Kinsman, John Makumbi, Fredrick Colebunders, Robert Hardon, Anita |
author_facet | Wanyenze, Rhoda K Kyaddondo, David Kinsman, John Makumbi, Fredrick Colebunders, Robert Hardon, Anita |
author_sort | Wanyenze, Rhoda K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) is based on information-giving while voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) includes individualised client-centered counseling. It is not known if the provider-client experiences, perceptions and client satisfaction with the information provided differs in the two approaches. METHODS: In 2008, we conducted structured interviews with 627 individuals in Uganda; 301 tested through PITC and 326 through voluntary counselling and testing (VCT). We compared client experiences and perceptions based on the essential elements of consent, confidentiality, counseling, and referral for follow-up care. We conducted multivariate analysis for predictors of reporting information or counselling as sufficient. RESULTS: In VCT, 96.6% (282) said they were asked for consent compared to 91.3% (198) in PITC (P = 0.01). About the information provided, 92.0% (286) in VCT found it sufficient compared to 78.7% (221) in PITC (P = <0.01). In VCT 79.9% (246) thought their results were kept confidential compared to 71.7% (200) in PITC (P = 0.02). Eighty percent (64) of HIV infected VCT clients said they were referred for follow-up care versus 87.3% (48) in PITC (p = 0.2). Predictors of perceived adequacy of information in PITC included an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.76, CI 1.41, 2.18) and expecting the test results received (adj.RR 1.18, CI 1.06, 1.33). For VCT significant factors included being given an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.62, CI 1.00, 2.60) and 3+ prior times tested, (adj.RR 1.05, CI 1.00, 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates good practices in the essential elements of HIV testing for both VCT and PITC. However, further quality enhancement is required in both testing approaches in relation to referral to HIV care post-test, client confidence in relation to confidentiality, and providing an opportunity to ask questions to address client-specific information needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3853209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38532092013-12-07 Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda Wanyenze, Rhoda K Kyaddondo, David Kinsman, John Makumbi, Fredrick Colebunders, Robert Hardon, Anita BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) is based on information-giving while voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) includes individualised client-centered counseling. It is not known if the provider-client experiences, perceptions and client satisfaction with the information provided differs in the two approaches. METHODS: In 2008, we conducted structured interviews with 627 individuals in Uganda; 301 tested through PITC and 326 through voluntary counselling and testing (VCT). We compared client experiences and perceptions based on the essential elements of consent, confidentiality, counseling, and referral for follow-up care. We conducted multivariate analysis for predictors of reporting information or counselling as sufficient. RESULTS: In VCT, 96.6% (282) said they were asked for consent compared to 91.3% (198) in PITC (P = 0.01). About the information provided, 92.0% (286) in VCT found it sufficient compared to 78.7% (221) in PITC (P = <0.01). In VCT 79.9% (246) thought their results were kept confidential compared to 71.7% (200) in PITC (P = 0.02). Eighty percent (64) of HIV infected VCT clients said they were referred for follow-up care versus 87.3% (48) in PITC (p = 0.2). Predictors of perceived adequacy of information in PITC included an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.76, CI 1.41, 2.18) and expecting the test results received (adj.RR 1.18, CI 1.06, 1.33). For VCT significant factors included being given an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.62, CI 1.00, 2.60) and 3+ prior times tested, (adj.RR 1.05, CI 1.00, 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates good practices in the essential elements of HIV testing for both VCT and PITC. However, further quality enhancement is required in both testing approaches in relation to referral to HIV care post-test, client confidence in relation to confidentiality, and providing an opportunity to ask questions to address client-specific information needs. BioMed Central 2013-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3853209/ /pubmed/24139203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-423 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wanyenze et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wanyenze, Rhoda K Kyaddondo, David Kinsman, John Makumbi, Fredrick Colebunders, Robert Hardon, Anita Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda |
title | Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda |
title_full | Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda |
title_fullStr | Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda |
title_short | Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda |
title_sort | client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary hiv counseling and testing services in uganda |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanyenzerhodak clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda AT kyaddondodavid clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda AT kinsmanjohn clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda AT makumbifredrick clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda AT colebundersrobert clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda AT hardonanita clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda |