Cargando…

Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda

BACKGROUND: Provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) is based on information-giving while voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) includes individualised client-centered counseling. It is not known if the provider-client experiences, perceptions and client satisfaction with the informat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wanyenze, Rhoda K, Kyaddondo, David, Kinsman, John, Makumbi, Fredrick, Colebunders, Robert, Hardon, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-423
_version_ 1782478798213611520
author Wanyenze, Rhoda K
Kyaddondo, David
Kinsman, John
Makumbi, Fredrick
Colebunders, Robert
Hardon, Anita
author_facet Wanyenze, Rhoda K
Kyaddondo, David
Kinsman, John
Makumbi, Fredrick
Colebunders, Robert
Hardon, Anita
author_sort Wanyenze, Rhoda K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) is based on information-giving while voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) includes individualised client-centered counseling. It is not known if the provider-client experiences, perceptions and client satisfaction with the information provided differs in the two approaches. METHODS: In 2008, we conducted structured interviews with 627 individuals in Uganda; 301 tested through PITC and 326 through voluntary counselling and testing (VCT). We compared client experiences and perceptions based on the essential elements of consent, confidentiality, counseling, and referral for follow-up care. We conducted multivariate analysis for predictors of reporting information or counselling as sufficient. RESULTS: In VCT, 96.6% (282) said they were asked for consent compared to 91.3% (198) in PITC (P = 0.01). About the information provided, 92.0% (286) in VCT found it sufficient compared to 78.7% (221) in PITC (P = <0.01). In VCT 79.9% (246) thought their results were kept confidential compared to 71.7% (200) in PITC (P = 0.02). Eighty percent (64) of HIV infected VCT clients said they were referred for follow-up care versus 87.3% (48) in PITC (p = 0.2). Predictors of perceived adequacy of information in PITC included an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.76, CI 1.41, 2.18) and expecting the test results received (adj.RR 1.18, CI 1.06, 1.33). For VCT significant factors included being given an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.62, CI 1.00, 2.60) and 3+ prior times tested, (adj.RR 1.05, CI 1.00, 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates good practices in the essential elements of HIV testing for both VCT and PITC. However, further quality enhancement is required in both testing approaches in relation to referral to HIV care post-test, client confidence in relation to confidentiality, and providing an opportunity to ask questions to address client-specific information needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3853209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38532092013-12-07 Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda Wanyenze, Rhoda K Kyaddondo, David Kinsman, John Makumbi, Fredrick Colebunders, Robert Hardon, Anita BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) is based on information-giving while voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) includes individualised client-centered counseling. It is not known if the provider-client experiences, perceptions and client satisfaction with the information provided differs in the two approaches. METHODS: In 2008, we conducted structured interviews with 627 individuals in Uganda; 301 tested through PITC and 326 through voluntary counselling and testing (VCT). We compared client experiences and perceptions based on the essential elements of consent, confidentiality, counseling, and referral for follow-up care. We conducted multivariate analysis for predictors of reporting information or counselling as sufficient. RESULTS: In VCT, 96.6% (282) said they were asked for consent compared to 91.3% (198) in PITC (P = 0.01). About the information provided, 92.0% (286) in VCT found it sufficient compared to 78.7% (221) in PITC (P = <0.01). In VCT 79.9% (246) thought their results were kept confidential compared to 71.7% (200) in PITC (P = 0.02). Eighty percent (64) of HIV infected VCT clients said they were referred for follow-up care versus 87.3% (48) in PITC (p = 0.2). Predictors of perceived adequacy of information in PITC included an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.76, CI 1.41, 2.18) and expecting the test results received (adj.RR 1.18, CI 1.06, 1.33). For VCT significant factors included being given an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.62, CI 1.00, 2.60) and 3+ prior times tested, (adj.RR 1.05, CI 1.00, 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates good practices in the essential elements of HIV testing for both VCT and PITC. However, further quality enhancement is required in both testing approaches in relation to referral to HIV care post-test, client confidence in relation to confidentiality, and providing an opportunity to ask questions to address client-specific information needs. BioMed Central 2013-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3853209/ /pubmed/24139203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-423 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wanyenze et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wanyenze, Rhoda K
Kyaddondo, David
Kinsman, John
Makumbi, Fredrick
Colebunders, Robert
Hardon, Anita
Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda
title Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda
title_full Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda
title_fullStr Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda
title_short Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda
title_sort client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary hiv counseling and testing services in uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-423
work_keys_str_mv AT wanyenzerhodak clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda
AT kyaddondodavid clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda
AT kinsmanjohn clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda
AT makumbifredrick clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda
AT colebundersrobert clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda
AT hardonanita clientproviderinteractionsinproviderinitiatedandvoluntaryhivcounselingandtestingservicesinuganda