Cargando…

Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method?

BACKGROUND: The delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost to the intra-prostatic tumour nodule may improve local control. The ability to deliver such treatments with hypofractionated SBRT was attempted using RapidArc (Varian Medical systems, Palo Alto, CA) and Multiplan (Accuray inc, Sunnyvale, CA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tree, Alison, Jones, Caroline, Sohaib, Aslam, Khoo, Vincent, van As, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24088319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-228
_version_ 1782478802788548608
author Tree, Alison
Jones, Caroline
Sohaib, Aslam
Khoo, Vincent
van As, Nicholas
author_facet Tree, Alison
Jones, Caroline
Sohaib, Aslam
Khoo, Vincent
van As, Nicholas
author_sort Tree, Alison
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost to the intra-prostatic tumour nodule may improve local control. The ability to deliver such treatments with hypofractionated SBRT was attempted using RapidArc (Varian Medical systems, Palo Alto, CA) and Multiplan (Accuray inc, Sunnyvale, CA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15 patients with dominant prostate nodules had RapidArc and Multiplan plans created using a 5 mm isotropic margin, except 3 mm posteriorly, aiming to deliver 47.5 Gy in 5 fractions to the boost whilst treating the whole prostate to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. An additional RapidArc plan was created using an 8 mm isotropic margin, except 5 mm posteriorly, to account for lack of intrafraction tracking. RESULTS: Both RapidArc and Multiplan can produce clinically acceptable boost plans to a dose of 47.5 Gy in 5 fractions. The mean rectal doses were lower for RapidArc plans (D50 13.2 Gy vs 15.5 Gy) but the number of missed constraints was the same for both planning methods (11/75). When the margin was increased to 8 mm/5 mm for the RapidArc plans to account for intrafraction motion, 37/75 constraints were missed. CONCLUSIONS: RapidArc and Multiplan can produce clinically acceptable simultaneous integrated boost plans, but the mean rectal D50 and D20 with RapidArc are lower. If the margins are increased to account for intrafraction motion, the RapidArc plans exceed at least one dose constraint in 13/15 cases. Delivering a simultaneous boost with hypofractionation appears feasible, but requires small margins needing intrafraction motion tracking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3853231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38532312013-12-07 Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method? Tree, Alison Jones, Caroline Sohaib, Aslam Khoo, Vincent van As, Nicholas Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost to the intra-prostatic tumour nodule may improve local control. The ability to deliver such treatments with hypofractionated SBRT was attempted using RapidArc (Varian Medical systems, Palo Alto, CA) and Multiplan (Accuray inc, Sunnyvale, CA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15 patients with dominant prostate nodules had RapidArc and Multiplan plans created using a 5 mm isotropic margin, except 3 mm posteriorly, aiming to deliver 47.5 Gy in 5 fractions to the boost whilst treating the whole prostate to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. An additional RapidArc plan was created using an 8 mm isotropic margin, except 5 mm posteriorly, to account for lack of intrafraction tracking. RESULTS: Both RapidArc and Multiplan can produce clinically acceptable boost plans to a dose of 47.5 Gy in 5 fractions. The mean rectal doses were lower for RapidArc plans (D50 13.2 Gy vs 15.5 Gy) but the number of missed constraints was the same for both planning methods (11/75). When the margin was increased to 8 mm/5 mm for the RapidArc plans to account for intrafraction motion, 37/75 constraints were missed. CONCLUSIONS: RapidArc and Multiplan can produce clinically acceptable simultaneous integrated boost plans, but the mean rectal D50 and D20 with RapidArc are lower. If the margins are increased to account for intrafraction motion, the RapidArc plans exceed at least one dose constraint in 13/15 cases. Delivering a simultaneous boost with hypofractionation appears feasible, but requires small margins needing intrafraction motion tracking. BioMed Central 2013-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3853231/ /pubmed/24088319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-228 Text en Copyright © 2013 Tree et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Tree, Alison
Jones, Caroline
Sohaib, Aslam
Khoo, Vincent
van As, Nicholas
Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method?
title Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method?
title_full Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method?
title_fullStr Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method?
title_full_unstemmed Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method?
title_short Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method?
title_sort prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24088319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-228
work_keys_str_mv AT treealison prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboostwhichisthebestplanningmethod
AT jonescaroline prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboostwhichisthebestplanningmethod
AT sohaibaslam prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboostwhichisthebestplanningmethod
AT khoovincent prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboostwhichisthebestplanningmethod
AT vanasnicholas prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboostwhichisthebestplanningmethod