Cargando…
Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method?
BACKGROUND: The delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost to the intra-prostatic tumour nodule may improve local control. The ability to deliver such treatments with hypofractionated SBRT was attempted using RapidArc (Varian Medical systems, Palo Alto, CA) and Multiplan (Accuray inc, Sunnyvale, CA...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24088319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-228 |
_version_ | 1782478802788548608 |
---|---|
author | Tree, Alison Jones, Caroline Sohaib, Aslam Khoo, Vincent van As, Nicholas |
author_facet | Tree, Alison Jones, Caroline Sohaib, Aslam Khoo, Vincent van As, Nicholas |
author_sort | Tree, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost to the intra-prostatic tumour nodule may improve local control. The ability to deliver such treatments with hypofractionated SBRT was attempted using RapidArc (Varian Medical systems, Palo Alto, CA) and Multiplan (Accuray inc, Sunnyvale, CA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15 patients with dominant prostate nodules had RapidArc and Multiplan plans created using a 5 mm isotropic margin, except 3 mm posteriorly, aiming to deliver 47.5 Gy in 5 fractions to the boost whilst treating the whole prostate to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. An additional RapidArc plan was created using an 8 mm isotropic margin, except 5 mm posteriorly, to account for lack of intrafraction tracking. RESULTS: Both RapidArc and Multiplan can produce clinically acceptable boost plans to a dose of 47.5 Gy in 5 fractions. The mean rectal doses were lower for RapidArc plans (D50 13.2 Gy vs 15.5 Gy) but the number of missed constraints was the same for both planning methods (11/75). When the margin was increased to 8 mm/5 mm for the RapidArc plans to account for intrafraction motion, 37/75 constraints were missed. CONCLUSIONS: RapidArc and Multiplan can produce clinically acceptable simultaneous integrated boost plans, but the mean rectal D50 and D20 with RapidArc are lower. If the margins are increased to account for intrafraction motion, the RapidArc plans exceed at least one dose constraint in 13/15 cases. Delivering a simultaneous boost with hypofractionation appears feasible, but requires small margins needing intrafraction motion tracking. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3853231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38532312013-12-07 Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method? Tree, Alison Jones, Caroline Sohaib, Aslam Khoo, Vincent van As, Nicholas Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost to the intra-prostatic tumour nodule may improve local control. The ability to deliver such treatments with hypofractionated SBRT was attempted using RapidArc (Varian Medical systems, Palo Alto, CA) and Multiplan (Accuray inc, Sunnyvale, CA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15 patients with dominant prostate nodules had RapidArc and Multiplan plans created using a 5 mm isotropic margin, except 3 mm posteriorly, aiming to deliver 47.5 Gy in 5 fractions to the boost whilst treating the whole prostate to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. An additional RapidArc plan was created using an 8 mm isotropic margin, except 5 mm posteriorly, to account for lack of intrafraction tracking. RESULTS: Both RapidArc and Multiplan can produce clinically acceptable boost plans to a dose of 47.5 Gy in 5 fractions. The mean rectal doses were lower for RapidArc plans (D50 13.2 Gy vs 15.5 Gy) but the number of missed constraints was the same for both planning methods (11/75). When the margin was increased to 8 mm/5 mm for the RapidArc plans to account for intrafraction motion, 37/75 constraints were missed. CONCLUSIONS: RapidArc and Multiplan can produce clinically acceptable simultaneous integrated boost plans, but the mean rectal D50 and D20 with RapidArc are lower. If the margins are increased to account for intrafraction motion, the RapidArc plans exceed at least one dose constraint in 13/15 cases. Delivering a simultaneous boost with hypofractionation appears feasible, but requires small margins needing intrafraction motion tracking. BioMed Central 2013-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3853231/ /pubmed/24088319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-228 Text en Copyright © 2013 Tree et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Tree, Alison Jones, Caroline Sohaib, Aslam Khoo, Vincent van As, Nicholas Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method? |
title | Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method? |
title_full | Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method? |
title_fullStr | Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method? |
title_full_unstemmed | Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method? |
title_short | Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method? |
title_sort | prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24088319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT treealison prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboostwhichisthebestplanningmethod AT jonescaroline prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboostwhichisthebestplanningmethod AT sohaibaslam prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboostwhichisthebestplanningmethod AT khoovincent prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboostwhichisthebestplanningmethod AT vanasnicholas prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboostwhichisthebestplanningmethod |