Cargando…

Use of Simulated Patients to Evaluate Combined Oral Contraceptive Dispensing Practices of Community Pharmacists

BACKGROUND: Combined oral contraceptive (COC) use is the most commonly used reversible method of birth control. The incorrect use of COCs is frequent and one of the most common causes of unintended pregnancies. Community pharmacists (CPs) are in a strategic position to improve COC use because they a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obreli-Neto, Paulo Roque, Pereira, Leonardo Régis Leira, Guidoni, Camilo Molino, Baldoni, André de Oliveira, Marusic, Srecko, de Lyra-Júnior, Divaldo Pereira, de Almeida, Kelsen Luis, Pazete, Ana Claudia Montolezi, do Nascimento, Janaina Dutra, Kos, Mitja, Girotto, Edmarlon, Cuman, Roberto Kenji Nakamura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079875
_version_ 1782294662361382912
author Obreli-Neto, Paulo Roque
Pereira, Leonardo Régis Leira
Guidoni, Camilo Molino
Baldoni, André de Oliveira
Marusic, Srecko
de Lyra-Júnior, Divaldo Pereira
de Almeida, Kelsen Luis
Pazete, Ana Claudia Montolezi
do Nascimento, Janaina Dutra
Kos, Mitja
Girotto, Edmarlon
Cuman, Roberto Kenji Nakamura
author_facet Obreli-Neto, Paulo Roque
Pereira, Leonardo Régis Leira
Guidoni, Camilo Molino
Baldoni, André de Oliveira
Marusic, Srecko
de Lyra-Júnior, Divaldo Pereira
de Almeida, Kelsen Luis
Pazete, Ana Claudia Montolezi
do Nascimento, Janaina Dutra
Kos, Mitja
Girotto, Edmarlon
Cuman, Roberto Kenji Nakamura
author_sort Obreli-Neto, Paulo Roque
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Combined oral contraceptive (COC) use is the most commonly used reversible method of birth control. The incorrect use of COCs is frequent and one of the most common causes of unintended pregnancies. Community pharmacists (CPs) are in a strategic position to improve COC use because they are the last health professional to interact with patients before drug use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the COC dispensing practices of CPs in a developing country. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted in community pharmacies of Assis and Ourinhos microregions, Brazil, between June 1, 2012, and October 30, 2012. Four simulated patients (SPs) (with counseled audio recording) visited community pharmacies with a prescription for Ciclo 21(®) (a COC containing ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg + levonorgestrel 15 mcg). The audio recording of every SP visit was listened to independently by 3 researchers to evaluate the COC dispensing practice. The percentage of CPs who performed a screening for safe use of COCs (i.e., taking of patients’ medical and family history, and measuring of blood pressure) and provided counseling, as well as the quality of the screening and counseling, were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 185 CPs contacted, 41 (22.2%) agreed to participate in the study and finished the study protocol. Only 3 CPs asked the SP a question (1 question asked by each professional), and all of the questions were closed-ended, viz., “do you smoke?” (n = 2) and “what is your age?” (n = 1). None of the CPs measured the patient’s blood pressure. Six CPs provided counseling when dispensing COCs (drug dosing, 5 CPs; possible adverse effects, 2 CPs), and one CP provided counseling regarding both aspects. CONCLUSION: The CPs evaluated did not dispense COC appropriately and could influence in the occurrence of negatives therapeutic outcomes such as adverse effects and treatment failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3853625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38536252013-12-09 Use of Simulated Patients to Evaluate Combined Oral Contraceptive Dispensing Practices of Community Pharmacists Obreli-Neto, Paulo Roque Pereira, Leonardo Régis Leira Guidoni, Camilo Molino Baldoni, André de Oliveira Marusic, Srecko de Lyra-Júnior, Divaldo Pereira de Almeida, Kelsen Luis Pazete, Ana Claudia Montolezi do Nascimento, Janaina Dutra Kos, Mitja Girotto, Edmarlon Cuman, Roberto Kenji Nakamura PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Combined oral contraceptive (COC) use is the most commonly used reversible method of birth control. The incorrect use of COCs is frequent and one of the most common causes of unintended pregnancies. Community pharmacists (CPs) are in a strategic position to improve COC use because they are the last health professional to interact with patients before drug use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the COC dispensing practices of CPs in a developing country. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted in community pharmacies of Assis and Ourinhos microregions, Brazil, between June 1, 2012, and October 30, 2012. Four simulated patients (SPs) (with counseled audio recording) visited community pharmacies with a prescription for Ciclo 21(®) (a COC containing ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg + levonorgestrel 15 mcg). The audio recording of every SP visit was listened to independently by 3 researchers to evaluate the COC dispensing practice. The percentage of CPs who performed a screening for safe use of COCs (i.e., taking of patients’ medical and family history, and measuring of blood pressure) and provided counseling, as well as the quality of the screening and counseling, were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 185 CPs contacted, 41 (22.2%) agreed to participate in the study and finished the study protocol. Only 3 CPs asked the SP a question (1 question asked by each professional), and all of the questions were closed-ended, viz., “do you smoke?” (n = 2) and “what is your age?” (n = 1). None of the CPs measured the patient’s blood pressure. Six CPs provided counseling when dispensing COCs (drug dosing, 5 CPs; possible adverse effects, 2 CPs), and one CP provided counseling regarding both aspects. CONCLUSION: The CPs evaluated did not dispense COC appropriately and could influence in the occurrence of negatives therapeutic outcomes such as adverse effects and treatment failure. Public Library of Science 2013-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3853625/ /pubmed/24324584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079875 Text en © 2013 Obreli-Neto et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Obreli-Neto, Paulo Roque
Pereira, Leonardo Régis Leira
Guidoni, Camilo Molino
Baldoni, André de Oliveira
Marusic, Srecko
de Lyra-Júnior, Divaldo Pereira
de Almeida, Kelsen Luis
Pazete, Ana Claudia Montolezi
do Nascimento, Janaina Dutra
Kos, Mitja
Girotto, Edmarlon
Cuman, Roberto Kenji Nakamura
Use of Simulated Patients to Evaluate Combined Oral Contraceptive Dispensing Practices of Community Pharmacists
title Use of Simulated Patients to Evaluate Combined Oral Contraceptive Dispensing Practices of Community Pharmacists
title_full Use of Simulated Patients to Evaluate Combined Oral Contraceptive Dispensing Practices of Community Pharmacists
title_fullStr Use of Simulated Patients to Evaluate Combined Oral Contraceptive Dispensing Practices of Community Pharmacists
title_full_unstemmed Use of Simulated Patients to Evaluate Combined Oral Contraceptive Dispensing Practices of Community Pharmacists
title_short Use of Simulated Patients to Evaluate Combined Oral Contraceptive Dispensing Practices of Community Pharmacists
title_sort use of simulated patients to evaluate combined oral contraceptive dispensing practices of community pharmacists
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079875
work_keys_str_mv AT obrelinetopauloroque useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT pereiraleonardoregisleira useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT guidonicamilomolino useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT baldoniandredeoliveira useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT marusicsrecko useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT delyrajuniordivaldopereira useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT dealmeidakelsenluis useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT pazeteanaclaudiamontolezi useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT donascimentojanainadutra useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT kosmitja useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT girottoedmarlon useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists
AT cumanrobertokenjinakamura useofsimulatedpatientstoevaluatecombinedoralcontraceptivedispensingpracticesofcommunitypharmacists