The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations

In this paper, we review and discuss ten common methodological mistakes found in retrospective chart reviews. The retrospective chart review is a widely applicable research methodology that can be used by healthcare disciplines as a means to direct subsequent prospective investigations. In many case...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matt, Vassar, Matthew, Holzmann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board of the Republic of Korea 2013
Materias:
Review Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324853
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2013.10.12
_version_ 1782294703301984256
author Matt, Vassar
Matthew, Holzmann
author_facet Matt, Vassar
Matthew, Holzmann
author_sort Matt, Vassar
collection PubMed
description In this paper, we review and discuss ten common methodological mistakes found in retrospective chart reviews. The retrospective chart review is a widely applicable research methodology that can be used by healthcare disciplines as a means to direct subsequent prospective investigations. In many cases in this review, we have also provided suggestions or accessible resources that researchers can apply as a “best practices” guide when planning, conducting, or reviewing this investigative method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3853868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board of the Republic of Korea
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38538682013-12-09 The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations Matt, Vassar Matthew, Holzmann J Educ Eval Health Prof Review Article In this paper, we review and discuss ten common methodological mistakes found in retrospective chart reviews. The retrospective chart review is a widely applicable research methodology that can be used by healthcare disciplines as a means to direct subsequent prospective investigations. In many cases in this review, we have also provided suggestions or accessible resources that researchers can apply as a “best practices” guide when planning, conducting, or reviewing this investigative method. National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board of the Republic of Korea 2013-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3853868/ /pubmed/24324853 http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2013.10.12 Text en ©2013, National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board of the Republic of Korea This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Matt, Vassar
Matthew, Holzmann
The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations
title The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations
title_full The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations
title_fullStr The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations
title_full_unstemmed The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations
title_short The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations
title_sort retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324853
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2013.10.12
work_keys_str_mv AT mattvassar theretrospectivechartreviewimportantmethodologicalconsiderations
AT matthewholzmann theretrospectivechartreviewimportantmethodologicalconsiderations
AT mattvassar retrospectivechartreviewimportantmethodologicalconsiderations
AT matthewholzmann retrospectivechartreviewimportantmethodologicalconsiderations

Ejemplares similares