Cargando…

Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres

BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a common and severely disabling disorder. For patients with severe fecal incontinence, surgery may prove to be the only adequate treatment option. METHODS: This study reports on 43 patients that were treated with a prosthetic sphincter system between 2005 and 2009 i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goos, Matthias, Baumgartner, Ulrich, Löhnert, Mathias, Thomusch, Oliver, Ruf, Günther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24502440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-45
_version_ 1782294716479438848
author Goos, Matthias
Baumgartner, Ulrich
Löhnert, Mathias
Thomusch, Oliver
Ruf, Günther
author_facet Goos, Matthias
Baumgartner, Ulrich
Löhnert, Mathias
Thomusch, Oliver
Ruf, Günther
author_sort Goos, Matthias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a common and severely disabling disorder. For patients with severe fecal incontinence, surgery may prove to be the only adequate treatment option. METHODS: This study reports on 43 patients that were treated with a prosthetic sphincter system between 2005 and 2009 in three coloproctological centres. Main Outcome Measures: complications, anal pressures before and after surgery, fecal continence score. RESULTS: The new artificial sphincter system significantly improves continence but leads to some complications in clinical practice. After implantation of the device, continence improved significantly (Keller & Jostarndt continence score 2.6 to 14.3 (P < 0.01)). With the band activated, resting pressure improved significantly as compared to baseline (10.7 mmHg vs. 66.1 mm Hg, P < 0.01). The same holds for anal sphincter squeeze pressure (32.2 mmHg versus 85.9 mm Hg, P < 0.01). Complications occurred in 21 patients (48.8%): 10 surgical and 13 technical. Two patients were affected by both technical and surgical problems. The median time of the occurrence was 3 months postop. In five patients difficulties arose within the first postoperative month leading to explantation of the device in three patients. 90% of complications occurred in the first year. CONCLUSIONS: The soft anal band of AMI (AAS), a new artificial anal sphincter, improves severe anal incontinence, but it must be regarded as a last treatment option to avoid a stoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3853926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38539262013-12-07 Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres Goos, Matthias Baumgartner, Ulrich Löhnert, Mathias Thomusch, Oliver Ruf, Günther BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a common and severely disabling disorder. For patients with severe fecal incontinence, surgery may prove to be the only adequate treatment option. METHODS: This study reports on 43 patients that were treated with a prosthetic sphincter system between 2005 and 2009 in three coloproctological centres. Main Outcome Measures: complications, anal pressures before and after surgery, fecal continence score. RESULTS: The new artificial sphincter system significantly improves continence but leads to some complications in clinical practice. After implantation of the device, continence improved significantly (Keller & Jostarndt continence score 2.6 to 14.3 (P < 0.01)). With the band activated, resting pressure improved significantly as compared to baseline (10.7 mmHg vs. 66.1 mm Hg, P < 0.01). The same holds for anal sphincter squeeze pressure (32.2 mmHg versus 85.9 mm Hg, P < 0.01). Complications occurred in 21 patients (48.8%): 10 surgical and 13 technical. Two patients were affected by both technical and surgical problems. The median time of the occurrence was 3 months postop. In five patients difficulties arose within the first postoperative month leading to explantation of the device in three patients. 90% of complications occurred in the first year. CONCLUSIONS: The soft anal band of AMI (AAS), a new artificial anal sphincter, improves severe anal incontinence, but it must be regarded as a last treatment option to avoid a stoma. BioMed Central 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3853926/ /pubmed/24502440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-45 Text en Copyright © 2013 Goos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goos, Matthias
Baumgartner, Ulrich
Löhnert, Mathias
Thomusch, Oliver
Ruf, Günther
Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres
title Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres
title_full Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres
title_fullStr Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres
title_full_unstemmed Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres
title_short Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres
title_sort experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24502440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-45
work_keys_str_mv AT goosmatthias experiencewithanewprostheticanalsphincterinthreecoloproctologicalcentres
AT baumgartnerulrich experiencewithanewprostheticanalsphincterinthreecoloproctologicalcentres
AT lohnertmathias experiencewithanewprostheticanalsphincterinthreecoloproctologicalcentres
AT thomuscholiver experiencewithanewprostheticanalsphincterinthreecoloproctologicalcentres
AT rufgunther experiencewithanewprostheticanalsphincterinthreecoloproctologicalcentres