Cargando…
Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres
BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a common and severely disabling disorder. For patients with severe fecal incontinence, surgery may prove to be the only adequate treatment option. METHODS: This study reports on 43 patients that were treated with a prosthetic sphincter system between 2005 and 2009 i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24502440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-45 |
_version_ | 1782294716479438848 |
---|---|
author | Goos, Matthias Baumgartner, Ulrich Löhnert, Mathias Thomusch, Oliver Ruf, Günther |
author_facet | Goos, Matthias Baumgartner, Ulrich Löhnert, Mathias Thomusch, Oliver Ruf, Günther |
author_sort | Goos, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a common and severely disabling disorder. For patients with severe fecal incontinence, surgery may prove to be the only adequate treatment option. METHODS: This study reports on 43 patients that were treated with a prosthetic sphincter system between 2005 and 2009 in three coloproctological centres. Main Outcome Measures: complications, anal pressures before and after surgery, fecal continence score. RESULTS: The new artificial sphincter system significantly improves continence but leads to some complications in clinical practice. After implantation of the device, continence improved significantly (Keller & Jostarndt continence score 2.6 to 14.3 (P < 0.01)). With the band activated, resting pressure improved significantly as compared to baseline (10.7 mmHg vs. 66.1 mm Hg, P < 0.01). The same holds for anal sphincter squeeze pressure (32.2 mmHg versus 85.9 mm Hg, P < 0.01). Complications occurred in 21 patients (48.8%): 10 surgical and 13 technical. Two patients were affected by both technical and surgical problems. The median time of the occurrence was 3 months postop. In five patients difficulties arose within the first postoperative month leading to explantation of the device in three patients. 90% of complications occurred in the first year. CONCLUSIONS: The soft anal band of AMI (AAS), a new artificial anal sphincter, improves severe anal incontinence, but it must be regarded as a last treatment option to avoid a stoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3853926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38539262013-12-07 Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres Goos, Matthias Baumgartner, Ulrich Löhnert, Mathias Thomusch, Oliver Ruf, Günther BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a common and severely disabling disorder. For patients with severe fecal incontinence, surgery may prove to be the only adequate treatment option. METHODS: This study reports on 43 patients that were treated with a prosthetic sphincter system between 2005 and 2009 in three coloproctological centres. Main Outcome Measures: complications, anal pressures before and after surgery, fecal continence score. RESULTS: The new artificial sphincter system significantly improves continence but leads to some complications in clinical practice. After implantation of the device, continence improved significantly (Keller & Jostarndt continence score 2.6 to 14.3 (P < 0.01)). With the band activated, resting pressure improved significantly as compared to baseline (10.7 mmHg vs. 66.1 mm Hg, P < 0.01). The same holds for anal sphincter squeeze pressure (32.2 mmHg versus 85.9 mm Hg, P < 0.01). Complications occurred in 21 patients (48.8%): 10 surgical and 13 technical. Two patients were affected by both technical and surgical problems. The median time of the occurrence was 3 months postop. In five patients difficulties arose within the first postoperative month leading to explantation of the device in three patients. 90% of complications occurred in the first year. CONCLUSIONS: The soft anal band of AMI (AAS), a new artificial anal sphincter, improves severe anal incontinence, but it must be regarded as a last treatment option to avoid a stoma. BioMed Central 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3853926/ /pubmed/24502440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-45 Text en Copyright © 2013 Goos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Goos, Matthias Baumgartner, Ulrich Löhnert, Mathias Thomusch, Oliver Ruf, Günther Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres |
title | Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres |
title_full | Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres |
title_fullStr | Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres |
title_full_unstemmed | Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres |
title_short | Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres |
title_sort | experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24502440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-45 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goosmatthias experiencewithanewprostheticanalsphincterinthreecoloproctologicalcentres AT baumgartnerulrich experiencewithanewprostheticanalsphincterinthreecoloproctologicalcentres AT lohnertmathias experiencewithanewprostheticanalsphincterinthreecoloproctologicalcentres AT thomuscholiver experiencewithanewprostheticanalsphincterinthreecoloproctologicalcentres AT rufgunther experiencewithanewprostheticanalsphincterinthreecoloproctologicalcentres |