Cargando…

Formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tDCS and motor training

Neurodegeneration accompanies the process of natural aging, reducing the ability to perform functional daily activities. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alters neuronal excitability and motor performance; however its beneficial effect on the induction of primary motor cortex (M1) plas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodwill, Alicia M., Reynolds, John, Daly, Robin M., Kidgell, Dawson J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00087
_version_ 1782294733912014848
author Goodwill, Alicia M.
Reynolds, John
Daly, Robin M.
Kidgell, Dawson J.
author_facet Goodwill, Alicia M.
Reynolds, John
Daly, Robin M.
Kidgell, Dawson J.
author_sort Goodwill, Alicia M.
collection PubMed
description Neurodegeneration accompanies the process of natural aging, reducing the ability to perform functional daily activities. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alters neuronal excitability and motor performance; however its beneficial effect on the induction of primary motor cortex (M1) plasticity in older adults is unclear. Moreover, little is known as to whether the tDCS electrode arrangement differentially affects M1 plasticity and motor performance in this population. In a double-blinded, cross-over trial, we compared unilateral, bilateral and sham tDCS combined with visuomotor tracking, on M1 plasticity and motor performance of the non-dominant upper limb, immediately post and 30 min following stimulation. We found (a) unilateral and bilateral tDCS decreased tracking error by 12–22% at both time points; with sham decreasing tracking error by 10% at 30 min only, (b) at both time points, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were facilitated (38–54%) and short-interval intracortical inhibition was released (21–36%) for unilateral and bilateral conditions relative to sham, (c) there were no differences between unilateral and bilateral conditions for any measure. These findings suggest that tDCS modulated elements of M1 plasticity, which improved motor performance irrespective of the electrode arrangement. The results provide preliminary evidence indicating that tDCS is a safe non-invasive tool to preserve or improve neurological function and motor control in older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3854104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38541042013-12-23 Formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tDCS and motor training Goodwill, Alicia M. Reynolds, John Daly, Robin M. Kidgell, Dawson J. Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Neurodegeneration accompanies the process of natural aging, reducing the ability to perform functional daily activities. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alters neuronal excitability and motor performance; however its beneficial effect on the induction of primary motor cortex (M1) plasticity in older adults is unclear. Moreover, little is known as to whether the tDCS electrode arrangement differentially affects M1 plasticity and motor performance in this population. In a double-blinded, cross-over trial, we compared unilateral, bilateral and sham tDCS combined with visuomotor tracking, on M1 plasticity and motor performance of the non-dominant upper limb, immediately post and 30 min following stimulation. We found (a) unilateral and bilateral tDCS decreased tracking error by 12–22% at both time points; with sham decreasing tracking error by 10% at 30 min only, (b) at both time points, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were facilitated (38–54%) and short-interval intracortical inhibition was released (21–36%) for unilateral and bilateral conditions relative to sham, (c) there were no differences between unilateral and bilateral conditions for any measure. These findings suggest that tDCS modulated elements of M1 plasticity, which improved motor performance irrespective of the electrode arrangement. The results provide preliminary evidence indicating that tDCS is a safe non-invasive tool to preserve or improve neurological function and motor control in older adults. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3854104/ /pubmed/24367333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00087 Text en Copyright © 2013 Goodwill, Reynolds, Daly, and Kidgell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Goodwill, Alicia M.
Reynolds, John
Daly, Robin M.
Kidgell, Dawson J.
Formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tDCS and motor training
title Formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tDCS and motor training
title_full Formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tDCS and motor training
title_fullStr Formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tDCS and motor training
title_full_unstemmed Formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tDCS and motor training
title_short Formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tDCS and motor training
title_sort formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tdcs and motor training
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00087
work_keys_str_mv AT goodwillaliciam formationofcorticalplasticityinolderadultsfollowingtdcsandmotortraining
AT reynoldsjohn formationofcorticalplasticityinolderadultsfollowingtdcsandmotortraining
AT dalyrobinm formationofcorticalplasticityinolderadultsfollowingtdcsandmotortraining
AT kidgelldawsonj formationofcorticalplasticityinolderadultsfollowingtdcsandmotortraining