Cargando…
Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
Effective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strateg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22801416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118 |
_version_ | 1782294742180036608 |
---|---|
author | Kasmas, S.H. Izar, M.C. França, C.N. Ramos, S.C. Moreira, F.T. Helfenstein, T. Moreno, R.A. Borges, N.C. Figueiredo-Neto, A.M. Fonseca, F.A. |
author_facet | Kasmas, S.H. Izar, M.C. França, C.N. Ramos, S.C. Moreira, F.T. Helfenstein, T. Moreno, R.A. Borges, N.C. Figueiredo-Neto, A.M. Fonseca, F.A. |
author_sort | Kasmas, S.H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Effective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies on markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption. A prospective, open label, randomized, parallel design study, with blinded endpoints, included 116 subjects. We compared the effects of a 12-week treatment with 40 mg rosuvastatin or the combination of 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe on markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol and β-sitosterol), synthesis (desmosterol), and their ratios to cholesterol. Both therapies similarly decreased total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, and increased apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.05 vs baseline for all). Simvastatin/ezetimibe increased plasma desmosterol (P = 0.012 vs baseline), and decreased campesterol and β-sitosterol (P < 0.0001 vs baseline for both), with higher desmosterol (P = 0.007) and lower campesterol and β-sitosterol compared to rosuvastatin, (P < 0.0001, for both). In addition, rosuvastatin increased the ratios of these markers to cholesterol (P < 0.002 vs baseline for all), whereas simvastatin/ezetimibe significantly decreased the campesterol/cholesterol ratio (P = 0.008 vs baseline) and tripled the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). The campesterol/cholesterol and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios were lower, whereas the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio was higher in patients receiving simvastatin/ezetimibe (P < 0.0001 vs rosuvastatin, for all). Pronounced differences in markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis were observed between two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3854149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38541492013-12-16 Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies Kasmas, S.H. Izar, M.C. França, C.N. Ramos, S.C. Moreira, F.T. Helfenstein, T. Moreno, R.A. Borges, N.C. Figueiredo-Neto, A.M. Fonseca, F.A. Braz J Med Biol Res Short Communication Effective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies on markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption. A prospective, open label, randomized, parallel design study, with blinded endpoints, included 116 subjects. We compared the effects of a 12-week treatment with 40 mg rosuvastatin or the combination of 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe on markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol and β-sitosterol), synthesis (desmosterol), and their ratios to cholesterol. Both therapies similarly decreased total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, and increased apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.05 vs baseline for all). Simvastatin/ezetimibe increased plasma desmosterol (P = 0.012 vs baseline), and decreased campesterol and β-sitosterol (P < 0.0001 vs baseline for both), with higher desmosterol (P = 0.007) and lower campesterol and β-sitosterol compared to rosuvastatin, (P < 0.0001, for both). In addition, rosuvastatin increased the ratios of these markers to cholesterol (P < 0.002 vs baseline for all), whereas simvastatin/ezetimibe significantly decreased the campesterol/cholesterol ratio (P = 0.008 vs baseline) and tripled the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). The campesterol/cholesterol and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios were lower, whereas the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio was higher in patients receiving simvastatin/ezetimibe (P < 0.0001 vs rosuvastatin, for all). Pronounced differences in markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis were observed between two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies. Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 2012-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3854149/ /pubmed/22801416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Kasmas, S.H. Izar, M.C. França, C.N. Ramos, S.C. Moreira, F.T. Helfenstein, T. Moreno, R.A. Borges, N.C. Figueiredo-Neto, A.M. Fonseca, F.A. Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies |
title | Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies |
title_full | Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies |
title_fullStr | Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies |
title_short | Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies |
title_sort | differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22801416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kasmassh differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies AT izarmc differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies AT francacn differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies AT ramossc differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies AT moreiraft differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies AT helfensteint differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies AT morenora differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies AT borgesnc differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies AT figueiredonetoam differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies AT fonsecafa differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies |