Cargando…

Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies

Effective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasmas, S.H., Izar, M.C., França, C.N., Ramos, S.C., Moreira, F.T., Helfenstein, T., Moreno, R.A., Borges, N.C., Figueiredo-Neto, A.M., Fonseca, F.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22801416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118
_version_ 1782294742180036608
author Kasmas, S.H.
Izar, M.C.
França, C.N.
Ramos, S.C.
Moreira, F.T.
Helfenstein, T.
Moreno, R.A.
Borges, N.C.
Figueiredo-Neto, A.M.
Fonseca, F.A.
author_facet Kasmas, S.H.
Izar, M.C.
França, C.N.
Ramos, S.C.
Moreira, F.T.
Helfenstein, T.
Moreno, R.A.
Borges, N.C.
Figueiredo-Neto, A.M.
Fonseca, F.A.
author_sort Kasmas, S.H.
collection PubMed
description Effective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies on markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption. A prospective, open label, randomized, parallel design study, with blinded endpoints, included 116 subjects. We compared the effects of a 12-week treatment with 40 mg rosuvastatin or the combination of 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe on markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol and β-sitosterol), synthesis (desmosterol), and their ratios to cholesterol. Both therapies similarly decreased total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, and increased apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.05 vs baseline for all). Simvastatin/ezetimibe increased plasma desmosterol (P = 0.012 vs baseline), and decreased campesterol and β-sitosterol (P < 0.0001 vs baseline for both), with higher desmosterol (P = 0.007) and lower campesterol and β-sitosterol compared to rosuvastatin, (P < 0.0001, for both). In addition, rosuvastatin increased the ratios of these markers to cholesterol (P < 0.002 vs baseline for all), whereas simvastatin/ezetimibe significantly decreased the campesterol/cholesterol ratio (P = 0.008 vs baseline) and tripled the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). The campesterol/cholesterol and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios were lower, whereas the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio was higher in patients receiving simvastatin/ezetimibe (P < 0.0001 vs rosuvastatin, for all). Pronounced differences in markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis were observed between two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3854149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38541492013-12-16 Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies Kasmas, S.H. Izar, M.C. França, C.N. Ramos, S.C. Moreira, F.T. Helfenstein, T. Moreno, R.A. Borges, N.C. Figueiredo-Neto, A.M. Fonseca, F.A. Braz J Med Biol Res Short Communication Effective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies on markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption. A prospective, open label, randomized, parallel design study, with blinded endpoints, included 116 subjects. We compared the effects of a 12-week treatment with 40 mg rosuvastatin or the combination of 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe on markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol and β-sitosterol), synthesis (desmosterol), and their ratios to cholesterol. Both therapies similarly decreased total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, and increased apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.05 vs baseline for all). Simvastatin/ezetimibe increased plasma desmosterol (P = 0.012 vs baseline), and decreased campesterol and β-sitosterol (P < 0.0001 vs baseline for both), with higher desmosterol (P = 0.007) and lower campesterol and β-sitosterol compared to rosuvastatin, (P < 0.0001, for both). In addition, rosuvastatin increased the ratios of these markers to cholesterol (P < 0.002 vs baseline for all), whereas simvastatin/ezetimibe significantly decreased the campesterol/cholesterol ratio (P = 0.008 vs baseline) and tripled the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). The campesterol/cholesterol and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios were lower, whereas the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio was higher in patients receiving simvastatin/ezetimibe (P < 0.0001 vs rosuvastatin, for all). Pronounced differences in markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis were observed between two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies. Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 2012-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3854149/ /pubmed/22801416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Kasmas, S.H.
Izar, M.C.
França, C.N.
Ramos, S.C.
Moreira, F.T.
Helfenstein, T.
Moreno, R.A.
Borges, N.C.
Figueiredo-Neto, A.M.
Fonseca, F.A.
Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title_full Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title_fullStr Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title_full_unstemmed Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title_short Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title_sort differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22801416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118
work_keys_str_mv AT kasmassh differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies
AT izarmc differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies
AT francacn differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies
AT ramossc differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies
AT moreiraft differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies
AT helfensteint differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies
AT morenora differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies
AT borgesnc differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies
AT figueiredonetoam differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies
AT fonsecafa differencesinsynthesisandabsorptionofcholesteroloftwoeffectivelipidloweringtherapies