Cargando…
Pain pressure threshold algometry of the abdominal wall in healthy women
The objective of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of pain pressure threshold algometry at various points of the abdominal wall of healthy women. Twenty-one healthy women in menacme with a mean age of 28 ± 5.4 years (range: 19-39 years) were included. All voluntee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22527127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500064 |
_version_ | 1782294768674406400 |
---|---|
author | Montenegro, M.L.L.S. Braz, C.A. Mateus-Vasconcelos, E.L. Rosa-e-Silva, J.C. Candido-dos-Reis, F.J. Nogueira, A.A. Poli-Neto, O.B. |
author_facet | Montenegro, M.L.L.S. Braz, C.A. Mateus-Vasconcelos, E.L. Rosa-e-Silva, J.C. Candido-dos-Reis, F.J. Nogueira, A.A. Poli-Neto, O.B. |
author_sort | Montenegro, M.L.L.S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of pain pressure threshold algometry at various points of the abdominal wall of healthy women. Twenty-one healthy women in menacme with a mean age of 28 ± 5.4 years (range: 19-39 years) were included. All volunteers had regular menstrual cycles (27-33 days) and were right-handed and, to the best of our knowledge, none were taking medications at the time of testing. Women with a diagnosis of depression, anxiety or other mood disturbances were excluded. Women with previous abdominal surgery, any pain condition or any evidence of inflammation, hypertension, smoking, alcoholism, or inflammatory disease were also excluded. Pain perception thresholds were assessed with a pressure algometer with digital traction and compression and a measuring capacity for 5 kg. All points were localized by palpation and marked with a felt-tipped pen and each individual was evaluated over a period of 2 days in two consecutive sessions, each session consisting of a set of 14 point measurements repeated twice by two examiners in random sequence. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean pain threshold obtained by the two examiners on 2 diferent days (examiner A: P = 1.00; examiner B: P = 0.75; Wilcoxon matched pairs test). There was excellent/good agreement between examiners for all days and all points. Our results have established baseline values to which future researchers will be able to refer. They show that pressure algometry is a reliable measure for pain perception in the abdominal wall of healthy women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3854264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38542642013-12-16 Pain pressure threshold algometry of the abdominal wall in healthy women Montenegro, M.L.L.S. Braz, C.A. Mateus-Vasconcelos, E.L. Rosa-e-Silva, J.C. Candido-dos-Reis, F.J. Nogueira, A.A. Poli-Neto, O.B. Braz J Med Biol Res Short Communication The objective of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of pain pressure threshold algometry at various points of the abdominal wall of healthy women. Twenty-one healthy women in menacme with a mean age of 28 ± 5.4 years (range: 19-39 years) were included. All volunteers had regular menstrual cycles (27-33 days) and were right-handed and, to the best of our knowledge, none were taking medications at the time of testing. Women with a diagnosis of depression, anxiety or other mood disturbances were excluded. Women with previous abdominal surgery, any pain condition or any evidence of inflammation, hypertension, smoking, alcoholism, or inflammatory disease were also excluded. Pain perception thresholds were assessed with a pressure algometer with digital traction and compression and a measuring capacity for 5 kg. All points were localized by palpation and marked with a felt-tipped pen and each individual was evaluated over a period of 2 days in two consecutive sessions, each session consisting of a set of 14 point measurements repeated twice by two examiners in random sequence. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean pain threshold obtained by the two examiners on 2 diferent days (examiner A: P = 1.00; examiner B: P = 0.75; Wilcoxon matched pairs test). There was excellent/good agreement between examiners for all days and all points. Our results have established baseline values to which future researchers will be able to refer. They show that pressure algometry is a reliable measure for pain perception in the abdominal wall of healthy women. Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 2012-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3854264/ /pubmed/22527127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500064 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Montenegro, M.L.L.S. Braz, C.A. Mateus-Vasconcelos, E.L. Rosa-e-Silva, J.C. Candido-dos-Reis, F.J. Nogueira, A.A. Poli-Neto, O.B. Pain pressure threshold algometry of the abdominal wall in healthy women |
title | Pain pressure threshold algometry of the abdominal wall in healthy women |
title_full | Pain pressure threshold algometry of the abdominal wall in healthy women |
title_fullStr | Pain pressure threshold algometry of the abdominal wall in healthy women |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain pressure threshold algometry of the abdominal wall in healthy women |
title_short | Pain pressure threshold algometry of the abdominal wall in healthy women |
title_sort | pain pressure threshold algometry of the abdominal wall in healthy women |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22527127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT montenegromlls painpressurethresholdalgometryoftheabdominalwallinhealthywomen AT brazca painpressurethresholdalgometryoftheabdominalwallinhealthywomen AT mateusvasconcelosel painpressurethresholdalgometryoftheabdominalwallinhealthywomen AT rosaesilvajc painpressurethresholdalgometryoftheabdominalwallinhealthywomen AT candidodosreisfj painpressurethresholdalgometryoftheabdominalwallinhealthywomen AT nogueiraaa painpressurethresholdalgometryoftheabdominalwallinhealthywomen AT polinetoob painpressurethresholdalgometryoftheabdominalwallinhealthywomen |