Cargando…

Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable ’direct to patient’ enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE)

BACKGROUND: Difficulties with recruitment pose a major, increasingly recognised challenge to the viability of research. We sought to explore whether a register of volunteers interested in research participation, with data linkage to electronic health records to identify suitable research participant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grant, Aileen, Ure, Jenny, Nicolson, Donald J, Hanley, Janet, Sheikh, Aziz, McKinstry, Brian, Sullivan, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-422
_version_ 1782294813259857920
author Grant, Aileen
Ure, Jenny
Nicolson, Donald J
Hanley, Janet
Sheikh, Aziz
McKinstry, Brian
Sullivan, Frank
author_facet Grant, Aileen
Ure, Jenny
Nicolson, Donald J
Hanley, Janet
Sheikh, Aziz
McKinstry, Brian
Sullivan, Frank
author_sort Grant, Aileen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Difficulties with recruitment pose a major, increasingly recognised challenge to the viability of research. We sought to explore whether a register of volunteers interested in research participation, with data linkage to electronic health records to identify suitable research participants, would prove acceptable to healthcare staff, patients and researchers. METHODS: We undertook a qualitative study in which a maximum variation sampling approach was adopted. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with patients, general practitioners (GP), practice managers and health service researchers in two Scottish health boards. Analysis was primarily thematic to identify a range of issues and concerns for all stakeholder groups. RESULTS: The concept of a national research register was, in general, acceptable to all stakeholder groups and was widely regarded as beneficial for research and for society. Patients, however, highlighted a number of conditions which should be met in the design of a register to expedite confidence and facilitate recruitment. They also gave their perceptions on how a register should operate and be promoted, favouring a range of media. GPs and practice managers were primarily concerned with the security and confidentiality of patient data and the impact a register may have on their workload. Researchers were supportive of the initiative seeing advantages in more rapid access to a wider pool of patients. They did raise concerns that GPs may be able to block access to personal patient data held in general practice clinical systems and that the register may not be representative of the whole population. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that patients, healthcare staff and researchers have a favourable view of the potential benefits of a national register to identify people who are potentially eligible and willing to participate in health related research. It has highlighted a number of issues for the developers to incorporate in the design of research registers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3854488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38544882013-12-07 Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable ’direct to patient’ enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE) Grant, Aileen Ure, Jenny Nicolson, Donald J Hanley, Janet Sheikh, Aziz McKinstry, Brian Sullivan, Frank BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Difficulties with recruitment pose a major, increasingly recognised challenge to the viability of research. We sought to explore whether a register of volunteers interested in research participation, with data linkage to electronic health records to identify suitable research participants, would prove acceptable to healthcare staff, patients and researchers. METHODS: We undertook a qualitative study in which a maximum variation sampling approach was adopted. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with patients, general practitioners (GP), practice managers and health service researchers in two Scottish health boards. Analysis was primarily thematic to identify a range of issues and concerns for all stakeholder groups. RESULTS: The concept of a national research register was, in general, acceptable to all stakeholder groups and was widely regarded as beneficial for research and for society. Patients, however, highlighted a number of conditions which should be met in the design of a register to expedite confidence and facilitate recruitment. They also gave their perceptions on how a register should operate and be promoted, favouring a range of media. GPs and practice managers were primarily concerned with the security and confidentiality of patient data and the impact a register may have on their workload. Researchers were supportive of the initiative seeing advantages in more rapid access to a wider pool of patients. They did raise concerns that GPs may be able to block access to personal patient data held in general practice clinical systems and that the register may not be representative of the whole population. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that patients, healthcare staff and researchers have a favourable view of the potential benefits of a national register to identify people who are potentially eligible and willing to participate in health related research. It has highlighted a number of issues for the developers to incorporate in the design of research registers. BioMed Central 2013-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3854488/ /pubmed/24139174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-422 Text en Copyright © 2013 Grant et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grant, Aileen
Ure, Jenny
Nicolson, Donald J
Hanley, Janet
Sheikh, Aziz
McKinstry, Brian
Sullivan, Frank
Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable ’direct to patient’ enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE)
title Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable ’direct to patient’ enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE)
title_full Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable ’direct to patient’ enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE)
title_fullStr Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable ’direct to patient’ enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE)
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable ’direct to patient’ enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE)
title_short Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable ’direct to patient’ enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE)
title_sort acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable ’direct to patient’ enrolment into research: the scottish health research register (share)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-422
work_keys_str_mv AT grantaileen acceptabilityandperceivedbarriersandfacilitatorstocreatinganationalresearchregistertoenabledirecttopatientenrolmentintoresearchthescottishhealthresearchregistershare
AT urejenny acceptabilityandperceivedbarriersandfacilitatorstocreatinganationalresearchregistertoenabledirecttopatientenrolmentintoresearchthescottishhealthresearchregistershare
AT nicolsondonaldj acceptabilityandperceivedbarriersandfacilitatorstocreatinganationalresearchregistertoenabledirecttopatientenrolmentintoresearchthescottishhealthresearchregistershare
AT hanleyjanet acceptabilityandperceivedbarriersandfacilitatorstocreatinganationalresearchregistertoenabledirecttopatientenrolmentintoresearchthescottishhealthresearchregistershare
AT sheikhaziz acceptabilityandperceivedbarriersandfacilitatorstocreatinganationalresearchregistertoenabledirecttopatientenrolmentintoresearchthescottishhealthresearchregistershare
AT mckinstrybrian acceptabilityandperceivedbarriersandfacilitatorstocreatinganationalresearchregistertoenabledirecttopatientenrolmentintoresearchthescottishhealthresearchregistershare
AT sullivanfrank acceptabilityandperceivedbarriersandfacilitatorstocreatinganationalresearchregistertoenabledirecttopatientenrolmentintoresearchthescottishhealthresearchregistershare