Cargando…

Metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Stable and well-aligned placement of tibial components during primary total knee arthroplasty is challenging in patients with bone defects. Although rectangular block-shaped augmentations are widely used to reduce the shearing force between the tibial tray and bone compared with wedge-sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsukada, Sachiyuki, Wakui, Motohiro, Matsueda, Munenori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-36
_version_ 1782294817123860480
author Tsukada, Sachiyuki
Wakui, Motohiro
Matsueda, Munenori
author_facet Tsukada, Sachiyuki
Wakui, Motohiro
Matsueda, Munenori
author_sort Tsukada, Sachiyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stable and well-aligned placement of tibial components during primary total knee arthroplasty is challenging in patients with bone defects. Although rectangular block-shaped augmentations are widely used to reduce the shearing force between the tibial tray and bone compared with wedge-shaped augmentations, the clinical result remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of primary total knee arthroplasty with metal block augmentation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the 3- to 6-year follow-up results of 33 knees that underwent total knee arthroplasty with metal block augmentation (metal-augmented group) for bone defects of the medial tibia and 132 varus knees without bone defects as the control group. All surgeries were performed using posterior-stabilized cemented prostheses in both groups. Cemented stems were routinely augmented when the metal block was used. RESULTS: There were no differences in implant survival rates (100% in metal-augmented and 99.2% in control) or knee function scores (82 points in metal-augmented and 84 points in control) between the two groups at the final follow-up examination (P = 0.60 and P = 0.09, respectively). No subsidence or loosening of the tibial tray was observed. Of 33 metal-augmented total knee arthroplasties, a nonprogressive radiolucent line beneath the metal was detected in 10 knees (30.3%), and rounding of the medial edge of the tibia was observed in 17 knees (51.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results of total knee arthroplasty with metal augmentation were not inferior to those in patients without bone defects. However, radiolucent lines were observed in 30.3%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3854506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38545062013-12-07 Metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty Tsukada, Sachiyuki Wakui, Motohiro Matsueda, Munenori J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Stable and well-aligned placement of tibial components during primary total knee arthroplasty is challenging in patients with bone defects. Although rectangular block-shaped augmentations are widely used to reduce the shearing force between the tibial tray and bone compared with wedge-shaped augmentations, the clinical result remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of primary total knee arthroplasty with metal block augmentation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the 3- to 6-year follow-up results of 33 knees that underwent total knee arthroplasty with metal block augmentation (metal-augmented group) for bone defects of the medial tibia and 132 varus knees without bone defects as the control group. All surgeries were performed using posterior-stabilized cemented prostheses in both groups. Cemented stems were routinely augmented when the metal block was used. RESULTS: There were no differences in implant survival rates (100% in metal-augmented and 99.2% in control) or knee function scores (82 points in metal-augmented and 84 points in control) between the two groups at the final follow-up examination (P = 0.60 and P = 0.09, respectively). No subsidence or loosening of the tibial tray was observed. Of 33 metal-augmented total knee arthroplasties, a nonprogressive radiolucent line beneath the metal was detected in 10 knees (30.3%), and rounding of the medial edge of the tibia was observed in 17 knees (51.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results of total knee arthroplasty with metal augmentation were not inferior to those in patients without bone defects. However, radiolucent lines were observed in 30.3%. BioMed Central 2013-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3854506/ /pubmed/24139483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-36 Text en Copyright © 2013 Tsukada et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tsukada, Sachiyuki
Wakui, Motohiro
Matsueda, Munenori
Metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty
title Metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty
title_full Metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr Metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty
title_short Metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty
title_sort metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-36
work_keys_str_mv AT tsukadasachiyuki metalblockaugmentationforbonedefectsofthemedialtibiaduringprimarytotalkneearthroplasty
AT wakuimotohiro metalblockaugmentationforbonedefectsofthemedialtibiaduringprimarytotalkneearthroplasty
AT matsuedamunenori metalblockaugmentationforbonedefectsofthemedialtibiaduringprimarytotalkneearthroplasty