Cargando…

The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales

BACKGROUND: We recently reported (Curr Biol 22:683–688, 2012) that the eyes of giant and colossal squid can grow to three times the diameter of the eyes of any other animal, including large fishes and whales. As an explanation to this extreme absolute eye size, we developed a theory for visual perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nilsson, Dan-E, Warrant, Eric J, Johnsen, Sönke, Hanlon, Roger T, Shashar, Nadav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-187
_version_ 1782294861882327040
author Nilsson, Dan-E
Warrant, Eric J
Johnsen, Sönke
Hanlon, Roger T
Shashar, Nadav
author_facet Nilsson, Dan-E
Warrant, Eric J
Johnsen, Sönke
Hanlon, Roger T
Shashar, Nadav
author_sort Nilsson, Dan-E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We recently reported (Curr Biol 22:683–688, 2012) that the eyes of giant and colossal squid can grow to three times the diameter of the eyes of any other animal, including large fishes and whales. As an explanation to this extreme absolute eye size, we developed a theory for visual performance in aquatic habitats, leading to the conclusion that the huge eyes of giant and colossal squid are uniquely suited for detection of sperm whales, which are important squid-predators in the depths where these squid live. A paper in this journal by Schmitz et al. (BMC Evol Biol 13:45, 2013) refutes our conclusions on the basis of two claims: (1) using allometric data they argue that the eyes of giant and colossal squid are not unexpectedly large for the size of the squid, and (2) a revision of the values used for modelling indicates that large eyes are not better for detection of approaching sperm whales than they are for any other task. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We agree with Schmitz et al. that their revised values for intensity and abundance of planktonic bioluminescence may be more realistic, or at least more appropriately conservative, but argue that their conclusions are incorrect because they have not considered some of the main arguments put forward in our paper. We also present new modelling to demonstrate that our conclusions remain robust, even with the revised input values suggested by Schmitz et al.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3854791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38547912013-12-07 The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales Nilsson, Dan-E Warrant, Eric J Johnsen, Sönke Hanlon, Roger T Shashar, Nadav BMC Evol Biol Correspondence BACKGROUND: We recently reported (Curr Biol 22:683–688, 2012) that the eyes of giant and colossal squid can grow to three times the diameter of the eyes of any other animal, including large fishes and whales. As an explanation to this extreme absolute eye size, we developed a theory for visual performance in aquatic habitats, leading to the conclusion that the huge eyes of giant and colossal squid are uniquely suited for detection of sperm whales, which are important squid-predators in the depths where these squid live. A paper in this journal by Schmitz et al. (BMC Evol Biol 13:45, 2013) refutes our conclusions on the basis of two claims: (1) using allometric data they argue that the eyes of giant and colossal squid are not unexpectedly large for the size of the squid, and (2) a revision of the values used for modelling indicates that large eyes are not better for detection of approaching sperm whales than they are for any other task. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We agree with Schmitz et al. that their revised values for intensity and abundance of planktonic bioluminescence may be more realistic, or at least more appropriately conservative, but argue that their conclusions are incorrect because they have not considered some of the main arguments put forward in our paper. We also present new modelling to demonstrate that our conclusions remain robust, even with the revised input values suggested by Schmitz et al. BioMed Central 2013-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3854791/ /pubmed/24010674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-187 Text en Copyright © 2013 Nilsson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Nilsson, Dan-E
Warrant, Eric J
Johnsen, Sönke
Hanlon, Roger T
Shashar, Nadav
The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title_full The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title_fullStr The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title_full_unstemmed The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title_short The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
title_sort giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-187
work_keys_str_mv AT nilssondane thegianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales
AT warrantericj thegianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales
AT johnsensonke thegianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales
AT hanlonrogert thegianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales
AT shasharnadav thegianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales
AT nilssondane gianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales
AT warrantericj gianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales
AT johnsensonke gianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales
AT hanlonrogert gianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales
AT shasharnadav gianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales