Cargando…
The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales
BACKGROUND: We recently reported (Curr Biol 22:683–688, 2012) that the eyes of giant and colossal squid can grow to three times the diameter of the eyes of any other animal, including large fishes and whales. As an explanation to this extreme absolute eye size, we developed a theory for visual perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-187 |
_version_ | 1782294861882327040 |
---|---|
author | Nilsson, Dan-E Warrant, Eric J Johnsen, Sönke Hanlon, Roger T Shashar, Nadav |
author_facet | Nilsson, Dan-E Warrant, Eric J Johnsen, Sönke Hanlon, Roger T Shashar, Nadav |
author_sort | Nilsson, Dan-E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We recently reported (Curr Biol 22:683–688, 2012) that the eyes of giant and colossal squid can grow to three times the diameter of the eyes of any other animal, including large fishes and whales. As an explanation to this extreme absolute eye size, we developed a theory for visual performance in aquatic habitats, leading to the conclusion that the huge eyes of giant and colossal squid are uniquely suited for detection of sperm whales, which are important squid-predators in the depths where these squid live. A paper in this journal by Schmitz et al. (BMC Evol Biol 13:45, 2013) refutes our conclusions on the basis of two claims: (1) using allometric data they argue that the eyes of giant and colossal squid are not unexpectedly large for the size of the squid, and (2) a revision of the values used for modelling indicates that large eyes are not better for detection of approaching sperm whales than they are for any other task. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We agree with Schmitz et al. that their revised values for intensity and abundance of planktonic bioluminescence may be more realistic, or at least more appropriately conservative, but argue that their conclusions are incorrect because they have not considered some of the main arguments put forward in our paper. We also present new modelling to demonstrate that our conclusions remain robust, even with the revised input values suggested by Schmitz et al. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3854791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38547912013-12-07 The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales Nilsson, Dan-E Warrant, Eric J Johnsen, Sönke Hanlon, Roger T Shashar, Nadav BMC Evol Biol Correspondence BACKGROUND: We recently reported (Curr Biol 22:683–688, 2012) that the eyes of giant and colossal squid can grow to three times the diameter of the eyes of any other animal, including large fishes and whales. As an explanation to this extreme absolute eye size, we developed a theory for visual performance in aquatic habitats, leading to the conclusion that the huge eyes of giant and colossal squid are uniquely suited for detection of sperm whales, which are important squid-predators in the depths where these squid live. A paper in this journal by Schmitz et al. (BMC Evol Biol 13:45, 2013) refutes our conclusions on the basis of two claims: (1) using allometric data they argue that the eyes of giant and colossal squid are not unexpectedly large for the size of the squid, and (2) a revision of the values used for modelling indicates that large eyes are not better for detection of approaching sperm whales than they are for any other task. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We agree with Schmitz et al. that their revised values for intensity and abundance of planktonic bioluminescence may be more realistic, or at least more appropriately conservative, but argue that their conclusions are incorrect because they have not considered some of the main arguments put forward in our paper. We also present new modelling to demonstrate that our conclusions remain robust, even with the revised input values suggested by Schmitz et al. BioMed Central 2013-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3854791/ /pubmed/24010674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-187 Text en Copyright © 2013 Nilsson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Nilsson, Dan-E Warrant, Eric J Johnsen, Sönke Hanlon, Roger T Shashar, Nadav The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales |
title | The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales |
title_full | The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales |
title_fullStr | The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales |
title_full_unstemmed | The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales |
title_short | The giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales |
title_sort | giant eyes of giant squid are indeed unexpectedly large, but not if used for spotting sperm whales |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nilssondane thegianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales AT warrantericj thegianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales AT johnsensonke thegianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales AT hanlonrogert thegianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales AT shasharnadav thegianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales AT nilssondane gianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales AT warrantericj gianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales AT johnsensonke gianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales AT hanlonrogert gianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales AT shasharnadav gianteyesofgiantsquidareindeedunexpectedlylargebutnotifusedforspottingspermwhales |