Cargando…

Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS) to Define Endpoints for Lymphatic Filariasis Mass Drug Administration: A Multicenter Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is targeted for global elimination through treatment of entire at-risk populations with repeated annual mass drug administration (MDA). Essential for program success is defining and confirming the appropriate endpoint for MDA when transmission is presumed to hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chu, Brian K., Deming, Michael, Biritwum, Nana-Kwadwo, Bougma, Windtaré R., Dorkenoo, Améyo M., El-Setouhy, Maged, Fischer, Peter U., Gass, Katherine, Gonzalez de Peña, Manuel, Mercado-Hernandez, Leda, Kyelem, Dominique, Lammie, Patrick J., Flueckiger, Rebecca M., Mwingira, Upendo J., Noordin, Rahmah, Offei Owusu, Irene, Ottesen, Eric A., Pavluck, Alexandre, Pilotte, Nils, Rao, Ramakrishna U., Samarasekera, Dilhani, Schmaedick, Mark A., Settinayake, Sunil, Simonsen, Paul E., Supali, Taniawati, Taleo, Fasihah, Torres, Melissa, Weil, Gary J., Won, Kimberly Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002584
_version_ 1782294887091142656
author Chu, Brian K.
Deming, Michael
Biritwum, Nana-Kwadwo
Bougma, Windtaré R.
Dorkenoo, Améyo M.
El-Setouhy, Maged
Fischer, Peter U.
Gass, Katherine
Gonzalez de Peña, Manuel
Mercado-Hernandez, Leda
Kyelem, Dominique
Lammie, Patrick J.
Flueckiger, Rebecca M.
Mwingira, Upendo J.
Noordin, Rahmah
Offei Owusu, Irene
Ottesen, Eric A.
Pavluck, Alexandre
Pilotte, Nils
Rao, Ramakrishna U.
Samarasekera, Dilhani
Schmaedick, Mark A.
Settinayake, Sunil
Simonsen, Paul E.
Supali, Taniawati
Taleo, Fasihah
Torres, Melissa
Weil, Gary J.
Won, Kimberly Y.
author_facet Chu, Brian K.
Deming, Michael
Biritwum, Nana-Kwadwo
Bougma, Windtaré R.
Dorkenoo, Améyo M.
El-Setouhy, Maged
Fischer, Peter U.
Gass, Katherine
Gonzalez de Peña, Manuel
Mercado-Hernandez, Leda
Kyelem, Dominique
Lammie, Patrick J.
Flueckiger, Rebecca M.
Mwingira, Upendo J.
Noordin, Rahmah
Offei Owusu, Irene
Ottesen, Eric A.
Pavluck, Alexandre
Pilotte, Nils
Rao, Ramakrishna U.
Samarasekera, Dilhani
Schmaedick, Mark A.
Settinayake, Sunil
Simonsen, Paul E.
Supali, Taniawati
Taleo, Fasihah
Torres, Melissa
Weil, Gary J.
Won, Kimberly Y.
author_sort Chu, Brian K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is targeted for global elimination through treatment of entire at-risk populations with repeated annual mass drug administration (MDA). Essential for program success is defining and confirming the appropriate endpoint for MDA when transmission is presumed to have reached a level low enough that it cannot be sustained even in the absence of drug intervention. Guidelines advanced by WHO call for a transmission assessment survey (TAS) to determine if MDA can be stopped within an LF evaluation unit (EU) after at least five effective rounds of annual treatment. To test the value and practicality of these guidelines, a multicenter operational research trial was undertaken in 11 countries covering various geographic and epidemiological settings. METHODOLOGY: The TAS was conducted twice in each EU with TAS-1 and TAS-2 approximately 24 months apart. Lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) formed the basis of the TAS survey design but specific EU characteristics defined the survey site (school or community), eligible population (6–7 year olds or 1(st)–2(nd) graders), survey type (systematic or cluster-sampling), target sample size, and critical cutoff (a statistically powered threshold below which transmission is expected to be no longer sustainable). The primary diagnostic tools were the immunochromatographic (ICT) test for W. bancrofti EUs and the BmR1 test (Brugia Rapid or PanLF) for Brugia spp. EUs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: In 10 of 11 EUs, the number of TAS-1 positive cases was below the critical cutoff, indicating that MDA could be stopped. The same results were found in the follow-up TAS-2, therefore, confirming the previous decision outcome. Sample sizes were highly sex and age-representative and closely matched the target value after factoring in estimates of non-participation. The TAS was determined to be a practical and effective evaluation tool for stopping MDA although its validity for longer-term post-MDA surveillance requires further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3855047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38550472013-12-11 Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS) to Define Endpoints for Lymphatic Filariasis Mass Drug Administration: A Multicenter Evaluation Chu, Brian K. Deming, Michael Biritwum, Nana-Kwadwo Bougma, Windtaré R. Dorkenoo, Améyo M. El-Setouhy, Maged Fischer, Peter U. Gass, Katherine Gonzalez de Peña, Manuel Mercado-Hernandez, Leda Kyelem, Dominique Lammie, Patrick J. Flueckiger, Rebecca M. Mwingira, Upendo J. Noordin, Rahmah Offei Owusu, Irene Ottesen, Eric A. Pavluck, Alexandre Pilotte, Nils Rao, Ramakrishna U. Samarasekera, Dilhani Schmaedick, Mark A. Settinayake, Sunil Simonsen, Paul E. Supali, Taniawati Taleo, Fasihah Torres, Melissa Weil, Gary J. Won, Kimberly Y. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is targeted for global elimination through treatment of entire at-risk populations with repeated annual mass drug administration (MDA). Essential for program success is defining and confirming the appropriate endpoint for MDA when transmission is presumed to have reached a level low enough that it cannot be sustained even in the absence of drug intervention. Guidelines advanced by WHO call for a transmission assessment survey (TAS) to determine if MDA can be stopped within an LF evaluation unit (EU) after at least five effective rounds of annual treatment. To test the value and practicality of these guidelines, a multicenter operational research trial was undertaken in 11 countries covering various geographic and epidemiological settings. METHODOLOGY: The TAS was conducted twice in each EU with TAS-1 and TAS-2 approximately 24 months apart. Lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) formed the basis of the TAS survey design but specific EU characteristics defined the survey site (school or community), eligible population (6–7 year olds or 1(st)–2(nd) graders), survey type (systematic or cluster-sampling), target sample size, and critical cutoff (a statistically powered threshold below which transmission is expected to be no longer sustainable). The primary diagnostic tools were the immunochromatographic (ICT) test for W. bancrofti EUs and the BmR1 test (Brugia Rapid or PanLF) for Brugia spp. EUs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: In 10 of 11 EUs, the number of TAS-1 positive cases was below the critical cutoff, indicating that MDA could be stopped. The same results were found in the follow-up TAS-2, therefore, confirming the previous decision outcome. Sample sizes were highly sex and age-representative and closely matched the target value after factoring in estimates of non-participation. The TAS was determined to be a practical and effective evaluation tool for stopping MDA although its validity for longer-term post-MDA surveillance requires further investigation. Public Library of Science 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3855047/ /pubmed/24340120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002584 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chu, Brian K.
Deming, Michael
Biritwum, Nana-Kwadwo
Bougma, Windtaré R.
Dorkenoo, Améyo M.
El-Setouhy, Maged
Fischer, Peter U.
Gass, Katherine
Gonzalez de Peña, Manuel
Mercado-Hernandez, Leda
Kyelem, Dominique
Lammie, Patrick J.
Flueckiger, Rebecca M.
Mwingira, Upendo J.
Noordin, Rahmah
Offei Owusu, Irene
Ottesen, Eric A.
Pavluck, Alexandre
Pilotte, Nils
Rao, Ramakrishna U.
Samarasekera, Dilhani
Schmaedick, Mark A.
Settinayake, Sunil
Simonsen, Paul E.
Supali, Taniawati
Taleo, Fasihah
Torres, Melissa
Weil, Gary J.
Won, Kimberly Y.
Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS) to Define Endpoints for Lymphatic Filariasis Mass Drug Administration: A Multicenter Evaluation
title Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS) to Define Endpoints for Lymphatic Filariasis Mass Drug Administration: A Multicenter Evaluation
title_full Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS) to Define Endpoints for Lymphatic Filariasis Mass Drug Administration: A Multicenter Evaluation
title_fullStr Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS) to Define Endpoints for Lymphatic Filariasis Mass Drug Administration: A Multicenter Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS) to Define Endpoints for Lymphatic Filariasis Mass Drug Administration: A Multicenter Evaluation
title_short Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS) to Define Endpoints for Lymphatic Filariasis Mass Drug Administration: A Multicenter Evaluation
title_sort transmission assessment surveys (tas) to define endpoints for lymphatic filariasis mass drug administration: a multicenter evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002584
work_keys_str_mv AT chubriank transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT demingmichael transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT biritwumnanakwadwo transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT bougmawindtarer transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT dorkenooameyom transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT elsetouhymaged transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT fischerpeteru transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT gasskatherine transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT gonzalezdepenamanuel transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT mercadohernandezleda transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT kyelemdominique transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT lammiepatrickj transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT flueckigerrebeccam transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT mwingiraupendoj transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT noordinrahmah transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT offeiowusuirene transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT ottesenerica transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT pavluckalexandre transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT pilottenils transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT raoramakrishnau transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT samarasekeradilhani transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT schmaedickmarka transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT settinayakesunil transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT simonsenpaule transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT supalitaniawati transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT taleofasihah transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT torresmelissa transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT weilgaryj transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation
AT wonkimberlyy transmissionassessmentsurveystastodefineendpointsforlymphaticfilariasismassdrugadministrationamulticenterevaluation