Cargando…
A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction
Prediction of genomic breeding values is of major practical relevance in dairy cattle breeding. Deterministic equations have been suggested to predict the accuracy of genomic breeding values in a given design which are based on training set size, reliability of phenotypes, and the number of independ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24339895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081046 |
_version_ | 1782294903556931584 |
---|---|
author | Erbe, Malena Gredler, Birgit Seefried, Franz Reinhold Bapst, Beat Simianer, Henner |
author_facet | Erbe, Malena Gredler, Birgit Seefried, Franz Reinhold Bapst, Beat Simianer, Henner |
author_sort | Erbe, Malena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prediction of genomic breeding values is of major practical relevance in dairy cattle breeding. Deterministic equations have been suggested to predict the accuracy of genomic breeding values in a given design which are based on training set size, reliability of phenotypes, and the number of independent chromosome segments ([Image: see text]). The aim of our study was to find a general deterministic equation for the average accuracy of genomic breeding values that also accounts for marker density and can be fitted empirically. Two data sets of 5′698 Holstein Friesian bulls genotyped with 50 K SNPs and 1′332 Brown Swiss bulls genotyped with 50 K SNPs and imputed to ∼600 K SNPs were available. Different k-fold (k = 2–10, 15, 20) cross-validation scenarios (50 replicates, random assignment) were performed using a genomic BLUP approach. A maximum likelihood approach was used to estimate the parameters of different prediction equations. The highest likelihood was obtained when using a modified form of the deterministic equation of Daetwyler et al. (2010), augmented by a weighting factor (w) based on the assumption that the maximum achievable accuracy is [Image: see text]. The proportion of genetic variance captured by the complete SNP sets ([Image: see text]) was 0.76 to 0.82 for Holstein Friesian and 0.72 to 0.75 for Brown Swiss. When modifying the number of SNPs, w was found to be proportional to the log of the marker density up to a limit which is population and trait specific and was found to be reached with ∼20′000 SNPs in the Brown Swiss population studied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3855218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38552182013-12-11 A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction Erbe, Malena Gredler, Birgit Seefried, Franz Reinhold Bapst, Beat Simianer, Henner PLoS One Research Article Prediction of genomic breeding values is of major practical relevance in dairy cattle breeding. Deterministic equations have been suggested to predict the accuracy of genomic breeding values in a given design which are based on training set size, reliability of phenotypes, and the number of independent chromosome segments ([Image: see text]). The aim of our study was to find a general deterministic equation for the average accuracy of genomic breeding values that also accounts for marker density and can be fitted empirically. Two data sets of 5′698 Holstein Friesian bulls genotyped with 50 K SNPs and 1′332 Brown Swiss bulls genotyped with 50 K SNPs and imputed to ∼600 K SNPs were available. Different k-fold (k = 2–10, 15, 20) cross-validation scenarios (50 replicates, random assignment) were performed using a genomic BLUP approach. A maximum likelihood approach was used to estimate the parameters of different prediction equations. The highest likelihood was obtained when using a modified form of the deterministic equation of Daetwyler et al. (2010), augmented by a weighting factor (w) based on the assumption that the maximum achievable accuracy is [Image: see text]. The proportion of genetic variance captured by the complete SNP sets ([Image: see text]) was 0.76 to 0.82 for Holstein Friesian and 0.72 to 0.75 for Brown Swiss. When modifying the number of SNPs, w was found to be proportional to the log of the marker density up to a limit which is population and trait specific and was found to be reached with ∼20′000 SNPs in the Brown Swiss population studied. Public Library of Science 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3855218/ /pubmed/24339895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081046 Text en © 2013 Erbe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Erbe, Malena Gredler, Birgit Seefried, Franz Reinhold Bapst, Beat Simianer, Henner A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction |
title | A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction |
title_full | A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction |
title_fullStr | A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction |
title_short | A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction |
title_sort | function accounting for training set size and marker density to model the average accuracy of genomic prediction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24339895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erbemalena afunctionaccountingfortrainingsetsizeandmarkerdensitytomodeltheaverageaccuracyofgenomicprediction AT gredlerbirgit afunctionaccountingfortrainingsetsizeandmarkerdensitytomodeltheaverageaccuracyofgenomicprediction AT seefriedfranzreinhold afunctionaccountingfortrainingsetsizeandmarkerdensitytomodeltheaverageaccuracyofgenomicprediction AT bapstbeat afunctionaccountingfortrainingsetsizeandmarkerdensitytomodeltheaverageaccuracyofgenomicprediction AT simianerhenner afunctionaccountingfortrainingsetsizeandmarkerdensitytomodeltheaverageaccuracyofgenomicprediction AT erbemalena functionaccountingfortrainingsetsizeandmarkerdensitytomodeltheaverageaccuracyofgenomicprediction AT gredlerbirgit functionaccountingfortrainingsetsizeandmarkerdensitytomodeltheaverageaccuracyofgenomicprediction AT seefriedfranzreinhold functionaccountingfortrainingsetsizeandmarkerdensitytomodeltheaverageaccuracyofgenomicprediction AT bapstbeat functionaccountingfortrainingsetsizeandmarkerdensitytomodeltheaverageaccuracyofgenomicprediction AT simianerhenner functionaccountingfortrainingsetsizeandmarkerdensitytomodeltheaverageaccuracyofgenomicprediction |