Cargando…

Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects of Cortical Microstimulation Parameters

Electrical microstimulation has been widely used to artificially activate neural circuits on fast time scales. Despite the ubiquity of its use, little is known about precisely how it activates neural pathways. Current is typically delivered to neural tissue in a manner that provides a locally balanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bari, Bilal A., Ollerenshaw, Douglas R., Millard, Daniel C., Wang, Qi, Stanley, Garrett B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082170
_version_ 1782294917831196672
author Bari, Bilal A.
Ollerenshaw, Douglas R.
Millard, Daniel C.
Wang, Qi
Stanley, Garrett B.
author_facet Bari, Bilal A.
Ollerenshaw, Douglas R.
Millard, Daniel C.
Wang, Qi
Stanley, Garrett B.
author_sort Bari, Bilal A.
collection PubMed
description Electrical microstimulation has been widely used to artificially activate neural circuits on fast time scales. Despite the ubiquity of its use, little is known about precisely how it activates neural pathways. Current is typically delivered to neural tissue in a manner that provides a locally balanced injection of positive and negative charge, resulting in negligible net charge delivery to avoid the neurotoxic effects of charge accumulation. Modeling studies have suggested that the most common approach, using a temporally symmetric current pulse waveform as the base unit of stimulation, results in preferential activation of axons, causing diffuse activation of neurons relative to the stimulation site. Altering waveform shape and using an asymmetric current pulse waveform theoretically reverses this bias and preferentially activates cell bodies, providing increased specificity. In separate studies, measurements of downstream cortical activation from sub-cortical microstimulation are consistent with this hypothesis, as are recent measurements of behavioral detection threshold currents from cortical microstimulation. Here, we compared the behavioral and electrophysiological effects of symmetric vs. asymmetric current waveform shape in cortical microstimulation. Using a go/no-go behavioral task, we found that microstimulation waveform shape significantly shifts psychometric performance, where a larger current pulse was necessary when applying an asymmetric waveform to elicit the same behavioral response, across a large range of behaviorally relevant current amplitudes. Using voltage-sensitive dye imaging of cortex in anesthetized animals with simultaneous cortical microstimulation, we found that altering microstimulation waveform shape shifted the cortical activation in a manner that mirrored the behavioral results. Taken together, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that asymmetric stimulation preferentially activates cell bodies, albeit at a higher threshold, as compared to symmetric stimulation. These findings demonstrate the sensitivity of the pathway to varying electrical stimulation parameters and underscore the importance of designing electrical stimuli for optimal activation of neural circuits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3855396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38553962013-12-11 Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects of Cortical Microstimulation Parameters Bari, Bilal A. Ollerenshaw, Douglas R. Millard, Daniel C. Wang, Qi Stanley, Garrett B. PLoS One Research Article Electrical microstimulation has been widely used to artificially activate neural circuits on fast time scales. Despite the ubiquity of its use, little is known about precisely how it activates neural pathways. Current is typically delivered to neural tissue in a manner that provides a locally balanced injection of positive and negative charge, resulting in negligible net charge delivery to avoid the neurotoxic effects of charge accumulation. Modeling studies have suggested that the most common approach, using a temporally symmetric current pulse waveform as the base unit of stimulation, results in preferential activation of axons, causing diffuse activation of neurons relative to the stimulation site. Altering waveform shape and using an asymmetric current pulse waveform theoretically reverses this bias and preferentially activates cell bodies, providing increased specificity. In separate studies, measurements of downstream cortical activation from sub-cortical microstimulation are consistent with this hypothesis, as are recent measurements of behavioral detection threshold currents from cortical microstimulation. Here, we compared the behavioral and electrophysiological effects of symmetric vs. asymmetric current waveform shape in cortical microstimulation. Using a go/no-go behavioral task, we found that microstimulation waveform shape significantly shifts psychometric performance, where a larger current pulse was necessary when applying an asymmetric waveform to elicit the same behavioral response, across a large range of behaviorally relevant current amplitudes. Using voltage-sensitive dye imaging of cortex in anesthetized animals with simultaneous cortical microstimulation, we found that altering microstimulation waveform shape shifted the cortical activation in a manner that mirrored the behavioral results. Taken together, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that asymmetric stimulation preferentially activates cell bodies, albeit at a higher threshold, as compared to symmetric stimulation. These findings demonstrate the sensitivity of the pathway to varying electrical stimulation parameters and underscore the importance of designing electrical stimuli for optimal activation of neural circuits. Public Library of Science 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3855396/ /pubmed/24340002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082170 Text en © 2013 Bari et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bari, Bilal A.
Ollerenshaw, Douglas R.
Millard, Daniel C.
Wang, Qi
Stanley, Garrett B.
Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects of Cortical Microstimulation Parameters
title Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects of Cortical Microstimulation Parameters
title_full Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects of Cortical Microstimulation Parameters
title_fullStr Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects of Cortical Microstimulation Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects of Cortical Microstimulation Parameters
title_short Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects of Cortical Microstimulation Parameters
title_sort behavioral and electrophysiological effects of cortical microstimulation parameters
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082170
work_keys_str_mv AT baribilala behavioralandelectrophysiologicaleffectsofcorticalmicrostimulationparameters
AT ollerenshawdouglasr behavioralandelectrophysiologicaleffectsofcorticalmicrostimulationparameters
AT millarddanielc behavioralandelectrophysiologicaleffectsofcorticalmicrostimulationparameters
AT wangqi behavioralandelectrophysiologicaleffectsofcorticalmicrostimulationparameters
AT stanleygarrettb behavioralandelectrophysiologicaleffectsofcorticalmicrostimulationparameters