Cargando…

Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer

While overall survival (OS) has historically been the primary endpoint for clinical trials in oncology, progression-free survival (PFS) has gained acceptance as a valuable surrogate endpoint. However, there are no known published reports about the value of PFS from the patient’s perspective. We deve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurvitz, Sara A., Lalla, Deepa, Crosby, Ross D., Mathias, Susan D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24218050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2734-4
_version_ 1782294934389260288
author Hurvitz, Sara A.
Lalla, Deepa
Crosby, Ross D.
Mathias, Susan D.
author_facet Hurvitz, Sara A.
Lalla, Deepa
Crosby, Ross D.
Mathias, Susan D.
author_sort Hurvitz, Sara A.
collection PubMed
description While overall survival (OS) has historically been the primary endpoint for clinical trials in oncology, progression-free survival (PFS) has gained acceptance as a valuable surrogate endpoint. However, there are no known published reports about the value of PFS from the patient’s perspective. We developed a questionnaire that included items regarding quality of life (QoL) and the importance of different treatment outcomes and presented hypothetical scenarios for which respondents were asked to indicate their preferences concerning treatments as they relate to PFS. 282 women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), ranging in age from 21 to 80 years completed an online version of this questionnaire. The majority of women (66 %) had been diagnosed with MBC within the previous 3 years and 56 % had been told their MBC had progressed. When asked to rank five treatment characteristics from most important to least important, respondents ranked “extending PFS” as the second most important treatment outcome after OS. When presented with a hypothetical scenario of two women receiving different treatments, respondents preferred the treatment that resulted in longer PFS (16 vs. 12 months), even when OS and side effects were assumed to be equal. Specifically, when asked to consider which woman within the hypothetical scenario had better QoL, physical functioning, and emotional well-being, respondents more often chose the woman who experienced longer PFS (QoL: 40 vs. 6 %; physical functioning: 32 vs. 8 %; emotional well-being: 58 vs. 6 %) compared to the woman within the hypothetical scenario who had a shorter time of progression. Respondents rated their own QoL highest after being told their MBC was responding to treatment (mean score 76.6) versus after the initial diagnosis of breast cancer and MBC (68.5 and 60.3). These findings suggest that extending PFS is an important treatment outcome and, from a patient perspective, improves overall QoL, physical functioning, and emotional well-being.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3855533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38555332013-12-11 Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer Hurvitz, Sara A. Lalla, Deepa Crosby, Ross D. Mathias, Susan D. Breast Cancer Res Treat Epidemiology While overall survival (OS) has historically been the primary endpoint for clinical trials in oncology, progression-free survival (PFS) has gained acceptance as a valuable surrogate endpoint. However, there are no known published reports about the value of PFS from the patient’s perspective. We developed a questionnaire that included items regarding quality of life (QoL) and the importance of different treatment outcomes and presented hypothetical scenarios for which respondents were asked to indicate their preferences concerning treatments as they relate to PFS. 282 women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), ranging in age from 21 to 80 years completed an online version of this questionnaire. The majority of women (66 %) had been diagnosed with MBC within the previous 3 years and 56 % had been told their MBC had progressed. When asked to rank five treatment characteristics from most important to least important, respondents ranked “extending PFS” as the second most important treatment outcome after OS. When presented with a hypothetical scenario of two women receiving different treatments, respondents preferred the treatment that resulted in longer PFS (16 vs. 12 months), even when OS and side effects were assumed to be equal. Specifically, when asked to consider which woman within the hypothetical scenario had better QoL, physical functioning, and emotional well-being, respondents more often chose the woman who experienced longer PFS (QoL: 40 vs. 6 %; physical functioning: 32 vs. 8 %; emotional well-being: 58 vs. 6 %) compared to the woman within the hypothetical scenario who had a shorter time of progression. Respondents rated their own QoL highest after being told their MBC was responding to treatment (mean score 76.6) versus after the initial diagnosis of breast cancer and MBC (68.5 and 60.3). These findings suggest that extending PFS is an important treatment outcome and, from a patient perspective, improves overall QoL, physical functioning, and emotional well-being. Springer US 2013-11-12 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3855533/ /pubmed/24218050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2734-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Hurvitz, Sara A.
Lalla, Deepa
Crosby, Ross D.
Mathias, Susan D.
Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer
title Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer
title_full Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer
title_fullStr Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer
title_short Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer
title_sort use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (mbc-p) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24218050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2734-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hurvitzsaraa useofthemetastaticbreastcancerprogressionmbcpquestionnairetoassessthevalueofprogressionfreesurvivalforwomenwithmetastaticbreastcancer
AT lalladeepa useofthemetastaticbreastcancerprogressionmbcpquestionnairetoassessthevalueofprogressionfreesurvivalforwomenwithmetastaticbreastcancer
AT crosbyrossd useofthemetastaticbreastcancerprogressionmbcpquestionnairetoassessthevalueofprogressionfreesurvivalforwomenwithmetastaticbreastcancer
AT mathiassusand useofthemetastaticbreastcancerprogressionmbcpquestionnairetoassessthevalueofprogressionfreesurvivalforwomenwithmetastaticbreastcancer